Diplomacy resumes as Armenia turns the Safarov case to its own advantage.

Diplomatic efforts around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict have restarted after days of tension and sharp exchange of words between Baku and Yerevan following the release of Ramil Safarov, on his return to Azerbaijani jurisdiction at the end of August. Safarov was imprisoned for life in Hungary in 2006 for killing an Armenian colleague in Budapest during a NATO language course.

The Special Envoy of the OSCE on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk yesterday met in Stepanakert with the de facto leadership of the territory, including the President Bako Sahakyan. A spokesman for Sahakyan said that issue of the release of Safarov was raised during the meeting.

In the meantime the Armenian Foreign Minister, Edward Nalbandian, met in Yerevan the visiting Foreign  Minister of Luxembourg, Jean Asselborn. Speaking to journalistrs after the meeting Nalbandian said  that over the last days, he received dozens of phone calls from his counterparts from various states, including his counterparts from the EU countries, who unequivocally expressed their negative attitude towards the Azerbaijani-Hungarian deal. "There is not a single country which would express its support to Azerbaijan", Edward Nalbandian concluded.

Hungary's decision to send Safarov back to Azerbaijan, and the way that he was received there took the international community by surprise, and their has been widespread sympathy with the Armenian position, with statements from a number of key governments and international institutions. Armenia has been trying to turn the situation to its advantage by depicting Azerbaijan as an irrespionsible player in international politics.

On its part Azerbaijan has insisted that the whole procedure of the release of Safarov was conducted strictly within legal frameworks. Azerbaijan has also articulated its decision within the context of its conflict with Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh, the continued occupation of its territory by Armenian forces and the humanitarian suffereing resulting from the conflict all of which condition Azerbaijani public opinion which has to be taken into consideration

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "The debate around this controversy is now entering a new phase, with both sides trying to capitalise on the issue both domestically and internationally. Regardless of this however, the most serious impact of the turn of events is that the lack of trust between the two governments, and even more, between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in general, has reached it lowest point for a very long time. This is already reflecting itself in the ongoing peace process facilitated by the OSCE Minsk Group, and in a range of public diplomacy activities that have been constructed with much patience and effort over a long time. Both will need to recalibrate to get back on track. On the other hand neither Armenia nor Azerbaijan can afford the luxury of disengaging completely from either the formal negotiations or the public diplomacy efforts. This allows a small space for facilitators to consider futrure steps. It is dissappointing however that some of those leading these processes seem to think that their only option at the moment is to do less, when in fact their best option is to do more."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The Fioreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian meeting the Foreign Minister of Luxembourg Jean Asselborn in Yerevan on 11 September 2012 (picture copurtesy of the Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Ramadan begins

Ramadan begins

The Muslim Holy month of Ramadan started on Wednesday, 18 February. For Muslims across the world, the holy month of Ramadan is a time for religious reflection, increased worship, charity and community. Observant Muslims abstain from all forms of food and drink between the hours of dawn and sunset whilst trying to reconnect with their faith. Islam adheres to the lunar calendar. This means that the month of Ramadan begins when the first crescent of a new moon is sighted  The lunar calendar is 10 to 11 days shorter than the modern 365-day Gregorian calendar, which is based on the Earth's rotation around the sun. This difference means Ramadan begins on a different day each year.  In Muslim-majority countries, dedicated state committees check for the crescent moon and officially announce the start of Ramadan. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and several other Gulf countries claimed to have sighted the crescent moon on 17 February and declared 18 February as the first day of Ramadan. However, Egypt, Turkey Jordan and some other countries said the crescent moon was not sighted and therefore announced that Ramadan would begin on Thursday 19 February. This means that the month of fasting will likely end on either Wednesday 18 March or Thursday 19 March, as there are either 29 or 30 days in a lunar month. As a result, Eid al-Fitr, the festival of breaking the fast, is likely to fall on either Thursday 19 March or Friday 20 March. Eid al-Fitr marks the end of Ramadan. Muslims tend to celebrate Eid with a small breakfast and give to charity before Eid prayers in congregation.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)