The award of the Nobel peace prize to the EU is well deserved. Regardless of its critics it has been a force for good in Europe and the world.

The announcement that the Nobel Committee has awarded this year's Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union took many by surprise.

The EU is more often than not the subject of criticism, and even ridicule, not least from some of the leaders of its own member states.A lot of the criticism is justified. The EU's bureaucracy is far too heavy. It tramples on the world stage like an elephone, at times when the speed of a gazelle is much more appropriate. Despite all promises of a more streamlined decision making process it often gets caught into squabbles between the member states, leaving everybody else utterly frustrated. The crisis in the Euro zone over the last years has also raised questions on the very existance of the so called "European project".

However to see only this side of the EU is not right. The Union has been instrumental to maintain peace on the European continent. It has helped to bring millions of European citizens living in underdeveloped areas of the continent out of proverty through its policy of cohesion and solidarity. It has helped the countries of Eastern Europe make the transition from Communism after 1989. It has also been generally a force for good in the world. The EU has championed human rights, including freedom of speech, the abolishment of the death penalty, the fight against torture, the rights of women and gay people and other basic freedoms, first by leading with example within its borders, but also by promoting human rights world wide.

The EU has also been more ready to use soft power in its dealings with the rest of thew world than military force.

It is not a perfect record by any means, but overall it is a record of impressive achievements.

The award of the Nobel Peace prize to the EU must now do two things. It must strengthen the voice of those who want the EU to be more active in promoting human rights and the peaceful resolution of conflicts. They must use the prize as a means of holding the EU member states and institutions to account on their performance on these issues. And on their part the member states and the EU institutions must now rise to the occasion. On the eve of another round of budget negotiations funds for this work need to be ringfenced against cuts.

This is the time to celebrate Europe's success in the important areas of human rights and peaceful resolution of conflicts. It is also the time to build on these successes and map out the way forward.

source: commonspace.eu editorial team.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)