Armenia and Azerbaijan congratulate Margvelashvili. Georgia's neighbours watch carefully the new leadership in Tbilisi

Commentary:

The Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan were amongst the first foreign leaders to send congratulatory messages to the new President of Georgia, Giorgi Margvelashvili after his election on Sunday. Both are likely to move quickly to build a relationship with the new Georgian leadership once the new Prime Minister is named at the end of this week. The new political situation in Georgia takes the region into uncharted waters, and both neighbours want to know how this is going to affect them.

The same unease could be seen ten years ago after Saakashvili's Rose revolution. But swiftly Saakashvili found an understanding with his neighbours. Those who feared he will try to export Georgia's revolution were proved wrong. There are of course tangible reasons for this. Despite all claims to the contrary the three countries are interlinked and inter connected. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan depend to some extent on Georgia for their links to the outside world. Georgians on their part are aware of the large Armenian and Azerbaijani ethnic minorities in their country. For Tbilisi, a good relationship with Baku and Yerevan is a must. It is true that Saakashvili for most of his time as President abandoned the Caucasian vocation and focused on relations with the west. But even he, later in his administration, realised that Georgia's regional standing is also good for its relations with Europe.

Both Ilham Aliev in Azerbaijan and Serzh Sargsyan in Armenia managed to build a good personal relationship with Saakashvili and had got used to him. They are now trying to figure out the new leadership that is emerging in Tbilisi. The set-up of this leadership is in itself unusual. The increased power of the Prime Minister creates a different hierarchy. Both countries have noted the praise heaped on Georgia after last Sunday's presidential election by western leaders and media for the way it conducted the poll. The sight of a President leaving office without much ado may set a pattern. This creates a certain discomfort with the two neighbours who see politics as a managed process. Georgia can be a much more effective model than far away western countries can ever hope to be.

Margvelashvili, and whoever becomes Prime Minister when Ivanishvili resigns shortly, will certainly move swiftly to establish good relations with the neighbours. Yet there will always remain for Georgia the temptation to abandon a regional role and aim instead to play on the grander world stage. This should not be. Georgia needs to offer its neighbours both leadership and friendship and should work harder to try to defuse the problems between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Regional initiatives are difficult to put together, but Georgia needs to promote them. It must also continue to work closely with the two countries bilaterally. In the end  Margvelashvili's election and the smooth political transfer of power in Georgia, which started one year ago and will finish next month, are good news for Armenia and Azerbaijan too. It is time each country sees the success of another as its victory and not its loss. At the moment the time when the three can work together in harmony may seem like a distant fairy tale. In reality it could happen sooner than some may think.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu.

photo: Giorgi Margvelashvili on the campaign trail before last Sunday's poll. (picture by Molly Corso (c) commonspace.eu)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)