Armenia and Azerbaijan congratulate Margvelashvili. Georgia's neighbours watch carefully the new leadership in Tbilisi

Commentary:

The Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan were amongst the first foreign leaders to send congratulatory messages to the new President of Georgia, Giorgi Margvelashvili after his election on Sunday. Both are likely to move quickly to build a relationship with the new Georgian leadership once the new Prime Minister is named at the end of this week. The new political situation in Georgia takes the region into uncharted waters, and both neighbours want to know how this is going to affect them.

The same unease could be seen ten years ago after Saakashvili's Rose revolution. But swiftly Saakashvili found an understanding with his neighbours. Those who feared he will try to export Georgia's revolution were proved wrong. There are of course tangible reasons for this. Despite all claims to the contrary the three countries are interlinked and inter connected. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan depend to some extent on Georgia for their links to the outside world. Georgians on their part are aware of the large Armenian and Azerbaijani ethnic minorities in their country. For Tbilisi, a good relationship with Baku and Yerevan is a must. It is true that Saakashvili for most of his time as President abandoned the Caucasian vocation and focused on relations with the west. But even he, later in his administration, realised that Georgia's regional standing is also good for its relations with Europe.

Both Ilham Aliev in Azerbaijan and Serzh Sargsyan in Armenia managed to build a good personal relationship with Saakashvili and had got used to him. They are now trying to figure out the new leadership that is emerging in Tbilisi. The set-up of this leadership is in itself unusual. The increased power of the Prime Minister creates a different hierarchy. Both countries have noted the praise heaped on Georgia after last Sunday's presidential election by western leaders and media for the way it conducted the poll. The sight of a President leaving office without much ado may set a pattern. This creates a certain discomfort with the two neighbours who see politics as a managed process. Georgia can be a much more effective model than far away western countries can ever hope to be.

Margvelashvili, and whoever becomes Prime Minister when Ivanishvili resigns shortly, will certainly move swiftly to establish good relations with the neighbours. Yet there will always remain for Georgia the temptation to abandon a regional role and aim instead to play on the grander world stage. This should not be. Georgia needs to offer its neighbours both leadership and friendship and should work harder to try to defuse the problems between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Regional initiatives are difficult to put together, but Georgia needs to promote them. It must also continue to work closely with the two countries bilaterally. In the end  Margvelashvili's election and the smooth political transfer of power in Georgia, which started one year ago and will finish next month, are good news for Armenia and Azerbaijan too. It is time each country sees the success of another as its victory and not its loss. At the moment the time when the three can work together in harmony may seem like a distant fairy tale. In reality it could happen sooner than some may think.

This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu.

photo: Giorgi Margvelashvili on the campaign trail before last Sunday's poll. (picture by Molly Corso (c) commonspace.eu)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)