Georgia's awkward neighbours.

Georgia has summoned the Armenian Ambassador following meeting between Chairman of Armenian Parliament and South Ossetian official. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Dennis Sammut discusses tensions in Georgia's relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan

The relationship between Georgia and its two neighbours in the South Caucasus - Armenia and Azerbaijan - has always been unusual. Even at best of times it is a difficult balancing act, trying to keep the best of relations with the two neighbours that consider each other enemies, whilst getting the best deal for Georgia in the meantime.

Relations between Georgians and Armenians have traditionally been competitive, but reasonably friendly. The two countries share a common Christian background and both boast to have some of the oldest roots of civilisation. There were often tense moments in the history of Georgian-Armenian relations but, with a few exceptions, common sense prevailed. Both sides knew that their nations were too intertwined for anything but good neighbourly relations to be acceptable.

Georgia's relationship with Azerbaijan has in modern times been less competitive, and thus somewhat easier to manage. Recent Azerbaijani assertiveness, fuelled by oil revenues, has not changed this very much because it also came with considerable economic benefit.

This has been the trend for the last two decades and more. At times, for example during the administration of President Shevardnadze, Georgia projected itself as the champion of the South Caucasus and positively promoted regional co-operation. Under President Saakashvili regional co-operation was out of favour, but the Georgian government maintained very good bilateral relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan nonetheless. The current Georgian government has stuck mainly to this format, whilst also supporting a trilateral relationship with Azerbaijan and Turkey.

But under the façade of Presidential hugs and promises of eternal friendship tensions exist. The large Armenian and Azerbaijani communities in Georgia have always been both a bridge for friendship and a source of tension. Some Georgians persist in seeing them as a fifth column, although in truth most of the minority communities have for most of the time been nothing but very compliant.

Over the last few days a number of new irritants have been introduced to this complex relationship. First, former President Saakashvili, who is wanted in Georgia by the Prosecutor's Office, turned up in Baku for a high profile event attended by President Aliev. Such a development could hardly have been possible without the approval of Aliev himself. Georgian calls for Saakashvili to be extradited were as expected, ignored. Azerbaijan has been irritated recently by the dislocation of some of their opposition to Tbilisi, and by the focus on Azerbaijan of some Georgian human rights activists. Many saw the presence of Saakashvili in Baku as a gentle reminder to Tbilisi that people in glass houses should not throw stones.

Now in a second development in a week, the Armenian Ambassador in Tbilisi has been summoned to the Georgian Foreign Ministry and told in no uncertain terms of Georgia's displeasure that the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament had met the Chairman of the Parliament of South Ossetia. That the meeting has taken place has now been confirmed by both South Ossetian and Armenian sources, although a spokesman of the Armenian Parliament was quick to emphasise that the meeting was of a "private" nature. Georgia is very sensitive about contacts with the separatist leadership in South Ossetia, and Armenia would have been aware of these sensitivities. Why they chose to have the meeting now is not clear, but there is speculation that Armenia is upset with the new Georgia-Azerbaijan-Turkey relations.

It is most likely that for the moment all sides will let matters rest. There is neither the mood, nor the need at present to do otherwise. But the Georgian government would have drawn its own conclusions from the two incidents. There is a danger that the current Georgian government will imitate its predecessor and withdraw metaphorically from the Caucasus to the greener fields of Europe. After all Georgia is now the only South Caucasus country with Associate membership of the European Union. But such a policy is neither wise nor realistic. Georgia is the heart of the Caucasus and it has a role to play in the region. Georgia needs to manage its relationship with its two neighbours, even if, at least from Tbilisi's perspective, they are awkward neighbours.  

source: Dennis Sammut contributed this op-ed for commonspace.eu

photo: President Aliev of Azerbaijan with former president Saakashvili of Georgia (archive picture)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

''Coalition of the Willing'' meets in Kyiv to restate its support for Ukraine

The ''Coalition of the  Willing''  of thirty five countries, has renewed its support of Ukriane, at a meeting in Kyiv, held on Ukraine's national day on 24 August, under the chairmanship of British Prime Minister,A ndy Burnham. Burnham has promised to keep up the pressure on Russia despite Moscow's "outrageous threats", on his first official visit to Ukraine as UK prime minister. Burnham met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing", set up by the UK and France under his predecessor Sir Keir Starmer. He said the coalition was "doing everything we can" while urging the US Congress to "ratchet up" economic pressure on Russia. The government has agreed to hand over blueprints for British-made components for the Scalp missile, a French version of the UK's Storm Shadow cruise missile - allowing Ukraine to produce the long-range weapon domestically. During the meeting with France and Ukraine, Burnham said allies were doing "everything we can" to "dig into our own stocks and help others dig into their stocks" of air defences to protect Ukraine. "This is the moment to keep up the pressure on Russia, the moment to squeeze their ability to fund this illegal war," Burnham said, praising the "strength" of the Ukrainian people. "Ukraine has been Europe's protector, not a drain on our security but the front line in keeping Europe safe." It comes after Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov criticised the UK's decision to share the missile blueprints. Peskov said it prevented "even the slightest progress" towards achieving peace. He told reporters on Monday that the Russian military was already gathering data to locate any missile production sites to destroy them. "Britain is involved in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime. Britain methodically and regularly adds fuel to the fire," he added. In response, Burnham said: "Who started the fire? That's the question, isn't it?" He added the issue of missile interceptors would be the main topic at the coalition of the willing meeting. Burnham chaired his first meeting of the "coalition of the willing" in Kyiv Burnham has been reaffirming the UK's backing for Kyiv in the wake of escalating Russian strikes on Ukraine in recent weeks - including one on a shopping centre on Friday that killed at least 16 people. In a joint statement after the meeting, Burnham and co-chairs French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the group would aim to strength Kyiv's air defences "as a matter or urgent priority". They also condemned Moscow's "systemic and escalating strikes against Ukraine's cities, critical infrastructure and civilians" and pledged to "constrain Russia's war chest through sanctions and actions against the "shadow fleet". (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)