Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Georgians to vote in "pluralist" local elections on June 15. Joseph Alexander Smith examines the political landscape ahead of the poll.

Georgians to vote in "pluralist" local elections on June 15. Joseph Alexander Smith examines the political landscape ahead of the poll.

29 May 2014

In the first in a series of reports for commonspace.eu Tbilisi based freelance journalist Joseph Alexander Smith examines the political landscape ahead of local elections in Georgia due on 15 June..

Georgians will go to the polls on June 15 to elect local officials after reforms to the country's system of local government were adopted in February this year. Georgia's new Law on Local Self-Government allows for the direct election of mayors in 12 cities across Georgia and for the election of all heads of municipalities in the country. Previously only the mayor of Tbilisi was chosen by citizens.

The ruling Georgian Dream coalition is widely expected to consolidate gains made at the polls over the last year and a half. The coalition, then headed by billionaire businessman Bidzina Ivanishvili, defeated President Mikheil Saakashvili's United National Movement (UNM) in parliamentary elections in October 2012, bringing an end to the UNM's 9-year hold on power.

Last year Saakashvili himself, having completed the maximum two presidential terms allowed by the constitution, was replaced as head of state by Georgian Dream candidate Giorgi Margvelashvili. The election also saw in constitutional changes which transferred many key presidential powers to the prime minister.

Until now, the UNM have maintained control over the office of Tbilisi Mayor, although Mayor Gigi Ugulava, who was elected in 2010, was suspended from office by Tbilisi's City Court after facing charges of misspending public funds. The mayor's suspension raised concerns, both domestically and among Georgia's EU and US partners, of a 'witch hunt' against UNM officials. Georgia's Constitutional Court has since ruled in favor of allowing Ugulava's to appeal against his suspension. To allay any further concerns, Prime Minister Irakli Gharibashvili has also announced a moratorium on prosecutions of public officials in the run-up to the elections.

The US-based National Democratic Institute (NDI) sent a mission to assess the pre-election environment at the end of April, concluding that while the political climate in the country is characterized by "pluralism and activism", "polarization continues to be a problem". 

According to NDI's statement, delivered on May 2, "voters felt confidence in the results of the 2012 parliamentary and 2013 presidential elections, which led to peaceful transfers of power... As the June 15, 2014, local elections approach, the electoral administration appears equipped to support a credible process, and the legal framework, while still open to improvement, provides a solid foundation."

The NDI mission also pointed out some areas of concern, saying that "efforts to delegitimize and criminalize political adversaries are still commonplace. The line between state and party remains blurred. Allegations of politically-motivated harassment tarnish an otherwise vibrant political landscape."

Civil society groups in Georgia have also voiced concern over a provision in the new local self-government law that allows local councils to vote out the elected mayor or head of the municipality (gamgebeli in Georgian). A joint statement by three leading NGOs warned that the provision "weakens the importance of the institution of directly elected mayors and gamgebelis" and makes them dependent on local councils for political support.

The new legislation also faced opposition from the Church last December, when the leader of the Georgian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Ilia II labelled the law a "threat" that could bring about the "disintegration" of the Georgian state. A politician from the Christian-Democratic Movement also suggested that the new legal framework could lead to "regional separatism". In response to these criticisms, a group of 23 NGOs urged the government not "suspend the reform process" or "back away" from a key pre-election promise to deliver "citizen-oriented self-government".

A total of 87 mayoral candidates have been registered by Georgia's Central Election Commission, representing 20 political parties and 4 electoral blocs. The Georgian Dream coalition, which is leading in opinion polls, unites six parties, including the Republican Party and Defence Minister Irakli Alasania's Free Democrats. The UNM, still headed by Saakashvili, is the largest opposition party, holding 65 out of 150 seats in parliament. A coalition headed by Nino Burjanadze, a former ally of Saakashvili and key figure in the 2003 Rose Revolution, is in third place.

The most closely-watched mayoral contest will be in Tbilisi, where Georgian Dream's candidate, former Infrastructure Minister Davit Narmania, will face the UNM's Nika Melia, head of the city's Mtatsminda District. Despite having the backing of the ruling party, Narmania's campaign has met with a fairly cool response from the electorate, with some asking whether a native of West Georgia's Samegrelo region is the best candidate for Mayor of the capital city.

In a pre-election poll commissioned by the NDI in April, Narmania was endorsed as first choice by 39% of respondents in the capital, followed by Nika Melia with 10%.  20% remained undecided and 13% said they wouldn't vote for any candidate. If Narmania fails to reach the threshold of 50% of the vote, a run-off election will be required to select a mayor for Tbilisi.

In other cities which will elect a mayor, Georgian dream is sitting on a fairly comfortable lead in the polls, with 42% of respondents saying it is the party they most closely identify with. Still, a win across the board is not guaranteed, with as much as 35% of those polled in the Black Sea port of Batumi unsure who they'll vote for.  

Joseph Alexander Smith is a freelance journalist based in Tbilisi. He writes regularly for the national newspaper Georgia Today. He contributed this report for commonspace.eu

photo: Tbilisi City Hall

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit
Trending

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

31 October 2026
António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut