EU foreign policy chief, MEPs, discuss Karabakh

The status quo in Nagorno-Karabakh is “unsustainable,” Federica Mogherini told the European Parliament on Tuesday in the aftermath of fierce fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The European Union’s foreign policy chief addressed the disputed province in a speech to the parliament in Strasbourg, which was followed by a question and answer session with parliamentarians. 

Clashes last week, described by Mogherini as the worst fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan since a 1994 ceasefire, killed dozens.

“We are increasing our efforts towards a settlement of the conflict. It has already inflicted much suffering,” said Mogherini, who said she has been in phone contact with the foreign ministers of the two countries this week. 

“[The conflict] continues to pose a threat to regional security in our neighbourhood, and it is an obstacle to the development of both countries and our region,” she said.

While Mogherini was careful in choosing her words, some parliamentarians took the opportunity in the question and answer session to apportion blame.

Heidi Hautala, a Finnish Green MEP, said “most of the conflict area belongs to Azerbaijan”, and said Armenia should give the “occupied territories”. She also called for UN peacekeepers to enter the region. 

Several other members of the European Parliament (MEPs) voiced their support for the Armenian cause, singling out Azerbaijan as responsible. These included Jaromír Štětina of the Czech Republic, Angel Dzhambazki of Bulgaria,Frank Engel of Luxembourg and Eleni Theocharous of Cyprus, who called for sanctions on Azerbaijan. 

Charles Tannock, a British MEP, blamed Azerbaijan for starting hostilities by attempting to retake territory on of April 2, and argued that President Aliyev is using the conflict to distract his population from the economic difficulties brought about by low oil prices.

"The use of advanced Russian weaponry by Azeri forces, such as rocket launchers shows us that the politics of Putin are at play in his so called sphere of influence,” Tannock said.

Others MEPs also criticised the involvement of Russia, which sells arms to both sides, is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organisation alongside Armenia, and is a co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, which is trying to find a solution to the dispute.

“How can Russia be a peacebroker and at the same time the biggest arms supplier to both countries?” said Andi Cristea, a Romanian MEP.

Russia has been stirring up ‘frozen conflicts’ across Eastern Europe, in hotspots including South Ossetia, Transnistria, eastern Ukraine and now Nagorno-Karabakh, argued Cristian Dan Preda, another Romanian MEP.

Others criticised Turkey, a close ally of Azerbaijan. Jean-Luc Schaffhauser, a French nationalist MEP, said President Recep Erdogan “finances terrorism” and is “blackmailing Europe”.

Herbert Salber, EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus, will be in the Caucasus this week, and is in constant contact with both parties, said Mogherini.

“A large scale conflict is not in the interests of anyone and can lead nowhere,” she said. “At the end of the day only the political will of the parties themselves can move things towards a peaceful settlement.”

Mogherini reiterated the EU’s support for the Minsk Group, and a settlement to the conflict on the basis of the ‘Madrid principles’. Armenia and Azerbaijan must make “reasonable compromises” to bring about peace, she said.

SOURCE: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/

PHOTO: Federica Mogherini 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)