Was Armenia's absence in Chicago an auto goal? Every time the Armenian chair is empty it looses political and diplomatic ground.

The absence of Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan from NATO's 25th Summit in Chicago is causing a debate in domestic and international circles. Whilst Armenia is not a member of NATO, it co-operates with the Alliance through the Partnership for Peace programme, and has a small contingent in the Afghanistan operation - ISAF. Sargsyan was apparently already on his way to the summit but decided not to attend in protest at the Summit declaration.

According to RIA Novosti, at a meeting with the Armenian community in Chicago, the Armenian Foreign Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian explained that Sargsyan was not attending because of an apparent contradiction between the draft wording of the Summit Declaration and the position of the OSCE Minsk Group responsible for mediation in the Karabakh conflict: "This formulation [of the Declaration] is not in line with the statements and decisions on the settlement of the issue adopted in recent years. It can not only impede the process of the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, but also endanger the fragile situation in the region, in particular against the background of unprecedented increase of Azerbaijan’s military expenses and bellicose rhetoric of its leadership".

Some Armenian analysts are questioning this excuse. In an interview with Tert.am, political scientist Edgar Vadanyan said that Sargsyan wanted to send a message to president Putin who also decided not to attend the summit, that he supported his position.

As expected, the focus of the Summit was largely on Afghanistan, but matters concerning the Caucasus region were also brought up, and have been incorporated into the Summit Declaration,

Released on the 20th of May, the Declaration states in paragraph 47:

"With our vision of a Euro-Atlantic area at peace, the persistence of protracted regional conflicts in South Caucasus and the Republic of Moldova continues to be a matter of great concern for the Alliance ... With respect to all these conflicts, we urge all parties to engage constructively and with reinforced political will in peaceful conflict resolution, and to respect the current negotiation formats. We call on them all to avoid steps that undermine regional security and stability. We remain committed in our support of the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and the Republic of Moldova, and will also continue to support efforts towards a peaceful settlement of these regional conflicts, based upon these principles and the norms of international law, the United Nations Charter, and the Helsinki Final Act".

It is this formulation that seems to have upset the Armenian side. However observers thing that the formulation was generic enough for Armenia to be able to attend the meeting. As it is not a member of NATO it was not expected to endorse the declaration in any case. By positioning itself in this way Armenia may have narrowed further its manoevrability in international diplomacy.

Not unexpectedly, Azerbaijan has seized the opportunity to score political points. The spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, Elman Abdullaev said that the Azerbaijani side highly appreciated the declaration, which was adopted in Chicago and noted that this document showed the fair position of Azerbaijan. “Such declaration shows that NATO demonstrates fair position again. Several countries, including OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries France and the US also signed the declaration. These countries showed their approaches again”. Abdullayev noted that Nalbandian’s statement that “the relevant clause of Final Declaration of Chicago Summit is contrary to the negotiations process of settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict and can damage the negotiations” was absurd, because France and the US that are mediating in the conflict’s settlement signed this Declaration.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that some observers think Armenia may have scored an auto-goal by not attending the summit. In the current diplomatic and geo-political context Armenian strategy  is best served by occupying any space that is available. Everytime the Armenian chair is empty - and it is happening often these days - it looses political and diplomatic ground.

source: commonspace.eu with RIA Novosti, Tert.Am, APA and NATO Information Service

Photo: Family photo of the leaders attending the meeting on Afghanistan at the 25th NATO summit in Chicago.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular