Menu

Was Armenia's absence in Chicago an auto goal? Every time the Armenian chair is empty it looses political and diplomatic ground.

The absence of Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan from NATO's 25th Summit in Chicago is causing a debate in domestic and international circles. Whilst Armenia is not a member of NATO, it co-operates with the Alliance through the Partnership for Peace programme, and has a small contingent in the Afghanistan operation - ISAF. Sargsyan was apparently already on his way to the summit but decided not to attend in protest at the Summit declaration.

According to RIA Novosti, at a meeting with the Armenian community in Chicago, the Armenian Foreign Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian explained that Sargsyan was not attending because of an apparent contradiction between the draft wording of the Summit Declaration and the position of the OSCE Minsk Group responsible for mediation in the Karabakh conflict: "This formulation [of the Declaration] is not in line with the statements and decisions on the settlement of the issue adopted in recent years. It can not only impede the process of the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, but also endanger the fragile situation in the region, in particular against the background of unprecedented increase of Azerbaijan’s military expenses and bellicose rhetoric of its leadership".

Some Armenian analysts are questioning this excuse. In an interview with Tert.am, political scientist Edgar Vadanyan said that Sargsyan wanted to send a message to president Putin who also decided not to attend the summit, that he supported his position.

As expected, the focus of the Summit was largely on Afghanistan, but matters concerning the Caucasus region were also brought up, and have been incorporated into the Summit Declaration,

Released on the 20th of May, the Declaration states in paragraph 47:

"With our vision of a Euro-Atlantic area at peace, the persistence of protracted regional conflicts in South Caucasus and the Republic of Moldova continues to be a matter of great concern for the Alliance ... With respect to all these conflicts, we urge all parties to engage constructively and with reinforced political will in peaceful conflict resolution, and to respect the current negotiation formats. We call on them all to avoid steps that undermine regional security and stability. We remain committed in our support of the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and the Republic of Moldova, and will also continue to support efforts towards a peaceful settlement of these regional conflicts, based upon these principles and the norms of international law, the United Nations Charter, and the Helsinki Final Act".

It is this formulation that seems to have upset the Armenian side. However observers thing that the formulation was generic enough for Armenia to be able to attend the meeting. As it is not a member of NATO it was not expected to endorse the declaration in any case. By positioning itself in this way Armenia may have narrowed further its manoevrability in international diplomacy.

Not unexpectedly, Azerbaijan has seized the opportunity to score political points. The spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, Elman Abdullaev said that the Azerbaijani side highly appreciated the declaration, which was adopted in Chicago and noted that this document showed the fair position of Azerbaijan. “Such declaration shows that NATO demonstrates fair position again. Several countries, including OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries France and the US also signed the declaration. These countries showed their approaches again”. Abdullayev noted that Nalbandian’s statement that “the relevant clause of Final Declaration of Chicago Summit is contrary to the negotiations process of settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict and can damage the negotiations” was absurd, because France and the US that are mediating in the conflict’s settlement signed this Declaration.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that some observers think Armenia may have scored an auto-goal by not attending the summit. In the current diplomatic and geo-political context Armenian strategy  is best served by occupying any space that is available. Everytime the Armenian chair is empty - and it is happening often these days - it looses political and diplomatic ground.

source: commonspace.eu with RIA Novosti, Tert.Am, APA and NATO Information Service

Photo: Family photo of the leaders attending the meeting on Afghanistan at the 25th NATO summit in Chicago.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan votes in referendum on important constitutional changes

Kazakhstan votes in referendum on important constitutional changes

Voting is taking place on Sunday (15 March)  in Kazakhstan in a nationwide referendum on a new draft Constitution. According to the Central Referendum Commission of Kazakhstan, 12,046,617 citizens are eligible to participate in the referendum. 359 international observers and 206 foreign journalists were accredited to monitor the referendum in order to ensure the transparency of the voting process. International organizations monitoring the referendum include the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the CIS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Organization of Turkic States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. The Central Referendum Commission must announce the final results of the vote within seven days after the referendum. A total of 10,401 polling stations are operating inside and outside the country to organize voting. 71 of them were opened at diplomatic missions in 54 countries. If citizens support the proposed changes, the new Constitution will enter into force on July 1, 2026. After that, elections for a new parliament are planned in the country, and these elections are expected to be organized by the end of August. The position of vice president will be implemented after the formation of the new parliament. The referendum is the fifth in the history of independent Kazakhstan and may lead to the adoption of a new fundamental law that will determine the direction of the country's political and legal development in the coming years. The Referendum is being held at the initiative of the President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev and envisages the implementation of large-scale constitutional reforms in the country. According to the submitted draft, approximately 84 percent of the text of the Constitution has been updated and new articles and sections have been developed. The question on the ballot paper asks, "Do you accept the new Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan?" Voters express their position by answering "for" or "against" this question. Currently, the Constitution adopted on August 30, 1995, is in force in Kazakhstan. Since its adoption, the document has been repeatedly amended and supplemented. The latest amendments entered into force in September 2022. However, the scale of the proposed reforms necessitated the preparation of a new Constitutional document. Thus, the amendments cover approximately 84 percent of the text of the existing basic law. The draft of the new Constitution was presented to the public in early February 2026. After the document was published, the country's citizens were given more than a month to familiarize themselves with it and discuss the proposed changes. (Click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)