The Politics of Song: When Baku hosts Eurovision 2012 next May at stake will be more than just a song

Baku will host the next Eurovision Song Festival from 22 – 26 May 2012. This will provide both an opportunity and a risk to both Armenia and Azerbaijan as their difficult relationship plays out on an unusual stage. At stake will be more than a simple song.

The first thought that came to the mind of most Azerbaijanis when it was announced that their country had won the 2011 Eurovision Song Festival was what a good opportunity this would be to showcase the new Baku, with all its gleaming new buildings and fairy lights.

A second thought followed soon after however. Will the Armenians participate?

This sums up the quandary of the Azerbaijan government, and the Azerbaijani society in general.  On the one hand they see the Eurovision as an opportunity to show all the best of their country. On the other hand the possibility of Armenian participation presents a number of risks and challenges their strategy that relation with Armenia can only develop after a resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

There are opportunities and risks for Armenia too. Armenian officials have for some time been trying to depict Azerbaijan as a belligerent nation where anti Armenian hysteria is rampant. A successful Armenian participation in the Baku Eurovision would make this narrative more difficult to sustain.

The first reaction from unofficial Armenian sources was that Armenia will not participate. Official Yerevan was however more cautious and said it would study the situation before taking any decision.

In an interview with Echo Muscovy radio station this week, Azerbaijan Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov stated that Azerbaijan will offer all necessary security guarantees to assure Armenian participation in the festival.  In a reaction to this statement the head of the Armenian delegation at the “Eurovision” song contest Gohar Gasparyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.  that Armenia wants to take part in Eurovision Song Contest 2012 in Baku, but Armenia needs serious security guarantees not only from the Azerbaijani side, but also from the European Broadcasting Union.

Many European are bemused by all this interest in Eurovision. The song contest is generally treated as an excuse for a jolly good party. The quality of the songs has for long been criticised as being mediocre, and the voting system as archaic. Nobody takes Eurovision seriously but most enjoy it.

For Armenia and Azerbaijan it is a different story. A successful Armenian participation in Eurovision will go a long way to restoring good people to people contacts between the two countries. The thought that several hundred Armenians will next May arrive in Baku to support their Eurovision entry will be a big setback for the warmongers on both sides, of which there are many. It may be a difficult security operation. Whatever the official positions hotheads and provocateurs may still use the opportunity to create an incident. The Armenian contingent will have to prove itself by an impeccable behaviour, and the host country, and its public, needs to show that the Caucasian tradition that guests are sent by God and should be honoured is respected.

There is a grave responsibility on the European Broadcasting Union. They must understand the importance of this event for the two countries. They must lay down clear and tough ground rules for host and visitor alike. They must ensure that other participants are sensitive to the issues.

The idea of Eurovison Song Contest emerged in the 1950s as a means of bringing Europe together after the slaughter and destruction of World War II.  It is therefore a great opportunity for healing the wounds of the past.

There are risks for both Armenia and Azerbaijan in this matter, but the opportunities are greater. Eurovision can be the start of a new chapter in Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

 

Prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

Photo courtesy of Eurovision TV

(c) commonspace.eu


Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Sanction Israel: More than one hundred former British and French diplomats make public call for safeguarding the rule of law

Sanction Israel: More than one hundred former British and French diplomats make public call for safeguarding the rule of law

In response to Israel's policy of occupation and destruction, around one hundred former representatives of France and the United Kingdom urge their governments to act through a series of sanctions aimed at safeguarding the rule of law. A coalition of 102 former French and British diplomats is calling on their countries to jointly sanction Israel, warning in an open letter that Israeli policy in occupied Palestinian territory threatens to permanently erase the possibility of a Palestinian state. France and the United Kingdom “must act together to uphold international law in Palestine”, said the letter published on Saturday by French outlet Le Monde. It urged the two governments to push for “equal rights for Israelis and Palestinians”. The signatories include former British ambassadors to the United Nations, Jeremy Greenstock and Emyr Jones Parry, and former French Middle East directors, Yves Aubin de la Messuziere and Denis Bauchard, drawing on decades of diplomatic postings across the region. “Palestinian house demolitions and rampant settler violence – with the connivance of the Israeli army and police – amount to ethnic cleansing,” said the letter. “The world no longer sees Israel as a genuine democracy,” it added. Such language, said Nicholas Hopton, a former UK ambassador to Iran, Qatar and Yemen and one of the signatories, was not invented by the diplomats themselves. “The words are not our own,” he told Al Jazeera. “They are taken from the international legal bodies, the UN, those who have been observing from a neutral position and with expertise.” (click image to read in full)
Editor's choice
News
Russian attacks against Ukrainian civilians continue

Russian attacks against Ukrainian civilians continue

Rescuers in Ukraine are continuing their search for survivors in the wreckage of a big shopping centre hit by Russia on Friday. Sixteen people were killed and 130 injured when two drones hit the busy centre in Kryvyi Rih in quick succession in what is known as a double-tap strike. Four people are still missing. The search and rescue operation could last for another two days. President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the "cynical and despicable" attack in which the second drone targeted emergency workers. The sides exchanged more fire overnight, with Ukrainian attacks said to have killed at least four people in Russia, including two children, and three people reported dead by Kyiv as a result of Russian strikes. The death toll from Friday's attack reached 16 after another body was retrieved from the rubble overnight, said Dnipropetrovsk regional head Oleksandr Hanzha. "We're doing everything possible to speed up... the search and rescue operation," he told Ukrainian TV on Saturday morning. (click image tio read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)