The Politics of Song: When Baku hosts Eurovision 2012 next May at stake will be more than just a song

Baku will host the next Eurovision Song Festival from 22 – 26 May 2012. This will provide both an opportunity and a risk to both Armenia and Azerbaijan as their difficult relationship plays out on an unusual stage. At stake will be more than a simple song.

The first thought that came to the mind of most Azerbaijanis when it was announced that their country had won the 2011 Eurovision Song Festival was what a good opportunity this would be to showcase the new Baku, with all its gleaming new buildings and fairy lights.

A second thought followed soon after however. Will the Armenians participate?

This sums up the quandary of the Azerbaijan government, and the Azerbaijani society in general.  On the one hand they see the Eurovision as an opportunity to show all the best of their country. On the other hand the possibility of Armenian participation presents a number of risks and challenges their strategy that relation with Armenia can only develop after a resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

There are opportunities and risks for Armenia too. Armenian officials have for some time been trying to depict Azerbaijan as a belligerent nation where anti Armenian hysteria is rampant. A successful Armenian participation in the Baku Eurovision would make this narrative more difficult to sustain.

The first reaction from unofficial Armenian sources was that Armenia will not participate. Official Yerevan was however more cautious and said it would study the situation before taking any decision.

In an interview with Echo Muscovy radio station this week, Azerbaijan Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov stated that Azerbaijan will offer all necessary security guarantees to assure Armenian participation in the festival.  In a reaction to this statement the head of the Armenian delegation at the “Eurovision” song contest Gohar Gasparyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.  that Armenia wants to take part in Eurovision Song Contest 2012 in Baku, but Armenia needs serious security guarantees not only from the Azerbaijani side, but also from the European Broadcasting Union.

Many European are bemused by all this interest in Eurovision. The song contest is generally treated as an excuse for a jolly good party. The quality of the songs has for long been criticised as being mediocre, and the voting system as archaic. Nobody takes Eurovision seriously but most enjoy it.

For Armenia and Azerbaijan it is a different story. A successful Armenian participation in Eurovision will go a long way to restoring good people to people contacts between the two countries. The thought that several hundred Armenians will next May arrive in Baku to support their Eurovision entry will be a big setback for the warmongers on both sides, of which there are many. It may be a difficult security operation. Whatever the official positions hotheads and provocateurs may still use the opportunity to create an incident. The Armenian contingent will have to prove itself by an impeccable behaviour, and the host country, and its public, needs to show that the Caucasian tradition that guests are sent by God and should be honoured is respected.

There is a grave responsibility on the European Broadcasting Union. They must understand the importance of this event for the two countries. They must lay down clear and tough ground rules for host and visitor alike. They must ensure that other participants are sensitive to the issues.

The idea of Eurovison Song Contest emerged in the 1950s as a means of bringing Europe together after the slaughter and destruction of World War II.  It is therefore a great opportunity for healing the wounds of the past.

There are risks for both Armenia and Azerbaijan in this matter, but the opportunities are greater. Eurovision can be the start of a new chapter in Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

 

Prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

Photo courtesy of Eurovision TV

(c) commonspace.eu


Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)