The Politics of Song: When Baku hosts Eurovision 2012 next May at stake will be more than just a song

Baku will host the next Eurovision Song Festival from 22 – 26 May 2012. This will provide both an opportunity and a risk to both Armenia and Azerbaijan as their difficult relationship plays out on an unusual stage. At stake will be more than a simple song.

The first thought that came to the mind of most Azerbaijanis when it was announced that their country had won the 2011 Eurovision Song Festival was what a good opportunity this would be to showcase the new Baku, with all its gleaming new buildings and fairy lights.

A second thought followed soon after however. Will the Armenians participate?

This sums up the quandary of the Azerbaijan government, and the Azerbaijani society in general.  On the one hand they see the Eurovision as an opportunity to show all the best of their country. On the other hand the possibility of Armenian participation presents a number of risks and challenges their strategy that relation with Armenia can only develop after a resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

There are opportunities and risks for Armenia too. Armenian officials have for some time been trying to depict Azerbaijan as a belligerent nation where anti Armenian hysteria is rampant. A successful Armenian participation in the Baku Eurovision would make this narrative more difficult to sustain.

The first reaction from unofficial Armenian sources was that Armenia will not participate. Official Yerevan was however more cautious and said it would study the situation before taking any decision.

In an interview with Echo Muscovy radio station this week, Azerbaijan Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov stated that Azerbaijan will offer all necessary security guarantees to assure Armenian participation in the festival.  In a reaction to this statement the head of the Armenian delegation at the “Eurovision” song contest Gohar Gasparyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.  that Armenia wants to take part in Eurovision Song Contest 2012 in Baku, but Armenia needs serious security guarantees not only from the Azerbaijani side, but also from the European Broadcasting Union.

Many European are bemused by all this interest in Eurovision. The song contest is generally treated as an excuse for a jolly good party. The quality of the songs has for long been criticised as being mediocre, and the voting system as archaic. Nobody takes Eurovision seriously but most enjoy it.

For Armenia and Azerbaijan it is a different story. A successful Armenian participation in Eurovision will go a long way to restoring good people to people contacts between the two countries. The thought that several hundred Armenians will next May arrive in Baku to support their Eurovision entry will be a big setback for the warmongers on both sides, of which there are many. It may be a difficult security operation. Whatever the official positions hotheads and provocateurs may still use the opportunity to create an incident. The Armenian contingent will have to prove itself by an impeccable behaviour, and the host country, and its public, needs to show that the Caucasian tradition that guests are sent by God and should be honoured is respected.

There is a grave responsibility on the European Broadcasting Union. They must understand the importance of this event for the two countries. They must lay down clear and tough ground rules for host and visitor alike. They must ensure that other participants are sensitive to the issues.

The idea of Eurovison Song Contest emerged in the 1950s as a means of bringing Europe together after the slaughter and destruction of World War II.  It is therefore a great opportunity for healing the wounds of the past.

There are risks for both Armenia and Azerbaijan in this matter, but the opportunities are greater. Eurovision can be the start of a new chapter in Armenian-Azerbaijani relations.

 

Prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

Photo courtesy of Eurovision TV

(c) commonspace.eu


Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular