The OSCE Monitoring Mission in Ukraine remains focused, despite criticism.

by Joseph d'Urso, reporting from Kiev for commonspace.eu.

The chief spokesman of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine today spoke of “more calm” in the east of the country, two weeks after a ceasefire agreement was agreed in Minsk. He also denied the organisation has lost public trust.

The OSCE’s Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in Ukraine is mandated to gather information and report facts on the ground. There has been a lull in fighting over the past 24 hours, with no combat fatalities reported on Wednesday. Speaking to journalists in Kiev, spokesman Michael Bociurkiw defended his organisation’s work against accusations it does not sufficiently attribute blame for ceasefire violations, saying the OSCE is “not in the business of naming names and pointing fingers”.

MORE THAN A MILLION DISPLACED

Bociurkiw spoke of the devastation which OSCE monitors observed yesterday in Debaltseve, the town from which Ukrainian troops withdrew on February 18th . “None of the buildings that we saw were untouched by shelling,” he said. “Many villages have been almost totally emptied of the civilian population.” Bociurkiw also referenced a UN report which states “more than a million people have been displaced within Ukraine”.

The OSCE reported seeing a range of ceasefire violations yesterday, including some artillery fire sporadic small arms fire near the city of Mariupol, which is seen as the next potential flashpoint in eastern Ukraine. The OSCE also observed the movement of military equipment. The next challenge is to oversee the withdrawal of heavy weaponry, as specified by the agreement reached in Minsk on 12 February. The places to where heavy weaponry is withdrawn “may need to be visited again and again by the mission for obvious reasons – for credible verification,” Bociurkiw said. “It is not enough to be invited to follow a removal process, it has to be complete. Like the Minsk agreements it is not a shopping list, you can’t pick and choose.”

A MANDATE TO MONITOR

Many in the Ukrainian capital are distrustful of the OSCE. A sticking point is that Russian monitors take part in OSCE patrols, because the Russian Federation is not an official party to the conflict, whereas Ukrainians do not A prime time broadcast of political programme ‘the X­Files’ on Ukrainian cable channel 1+1, which accused the OSCE of Russian bias, has compounded this problem, according to Iryna Ivashko of the International Centre for Policy Studies in Kiev. An incident in September in which two separatist fighters got into an SMM vehicle has been used as evidence of supposed pro­Russian bias.

The OSCE admitted to and apologised for this incident. Bociurkiw said “I don’t know I’d agree there is widespread cynicism and distrust,” describing ‘dialogue facilitation’ as one of the Mission’s most important background roles. “We’ll soon have been almost a year in Ukraine, and the contribution of the mission is widely known and appreciated,” he said, adding that the OSCE has an active presence active in Kharkiv and Lviv as well as the capital and war­torn eastern regions.

SWIFT AND DECISIVE

Within the international community there has been increased scepticism of the durability of the Minsk agreements. Ilkka Kanerva, president of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, said in Copenhagen yesterday "I am profoundly disturbed by the illegal separatists' continuing refusal to grant unlimited, safe access to OSCE monitors on the ground in Ukraine and their violations of the Minsk Package of Measures.  “By extension, I am also disturbed by Russia's apparent unwillingness to publicly insist that the rebels immediately allow the monitors access, stop all ceasefire violations and withdraw all heavy weapons. Any attempts by the rebels to threaten the city of Mariupol must be met with a swift and decisive response by the international community.”

It remains to be seen whether the current lull in fighting is temporary, or a lasting ceasefire under the Minsk protocols can be reached. General Philip Breedlove, NATO's top commander, said on February 20. "it is a ceasefire in name only".

source: Joseph d'Urso filed this report from Kiev for commonspace.eu

photo: The Spokesperson of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine,  Michael Bociurkiw at a brieifng in Kiev on Thursday, 26 February 2015.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.
Editor's choice
News
Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus

Medical Students in Tbilisi have participated in the campaign LANDMINE FREE SOUTH CAUCASUS 2026. The regional’ Landmine Free South Caucasus’ (LFSC) campaign was initiated by LINKS Europe Foundation in 2018 to address the critical issue of landmine and unexploded ordnance contamination in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. With significant landmine contamination in the region posing an ongoing threat to life and eliciting high economic costs, LFSC advocated for a regional, holistic approach to complete clearance.  Future Doctors Join the Conversation on Friday, 16 October in Tbilisi. "As part of the Landmine Free South Caucasus 2026 campaign, an informative and interactive meeting was held in Tbilisi with medical students. The session was conducted by George Simonishvili, South Caucasus Co-ordinator for LINKS Europe.  The meeting focused on the humanitarian consequences of landmines and other explosive remnants of war in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, with particular attention to the Red Bridge minefield near the borders of the three countries, and emphasised that these dangers remain a current humanitarian challenge. It also underlined that future medical professionals will encounter the long-term effects of explosion injuries and can play a role in awareness and prevention.  Students actively engaged throughout the discussion, showing strong interest in the humanitarian impact and the need for cooperation. Under the slogan "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," the event encouraged students to support public awareness, solidarity with survivors, and a safer South Caucasus free from landmine threats.  The event was organised by LINKS Europe as part of LFSC26.  "Medical Students Stand for a Landmine Free South Caucasus," "Future Doctors, Safer Futures: Together Against Landmines." "Future Doctors for a Landmine Free South Caucasus".

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)