The OSCE Monitoring Mission in Ukraine remains focused, despite criticism.

by Joseph d'Urso, reporting from Kiev for commonspace.eu.

The chief spokesman of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine today spoke of “more calm” in the east of the country, two weeks after a ceasefire agreement was agreed in Minsk. He also denied the organisation has lost public trust.

The OSCE’s Special Monitoring Mission (SMM) in Ukraine is mandated to gather information and report facts on the ground. There has been a lull in fighting over the past 24 hours, with no combat fatalities reported on Wednesday. Speaking to journalists in Kiev, spokesman Michael Bociurkiw defended his organisation’s work against accusations it does not sufficiently attribute blame for ceasefire violations, saying the OSCE is “not in the business of naming names and pointing fingers”.

MORE THAN A MILLION DISPLACED

Bociurkiw spoke of the devastation which OSCE monitors observed yesterday in Debaltseve, the town from which Ukrainian troops withdrew on February 18th . “None of the buildings that we saw were untouched by shelling,” he said. “Many villages have been almost totally emptied of the civilian population.” Bociurkiw also referenced a UN report which states “more than a million people have been displaced within Ukraine”.

The OSCE reported seeing a range of ceasefire violations yesterday, including some artillery fire sporadic small arms fire near the city of Mariupol, which is seen as the next potential flashpoint in eastern Ukraine. The OSCE also observed the movement of military equipment. The next challenge is to oversee the withdrawal of heavy weaponry, as specified by the agreement reached in Minsk on 12 February. The places to where heavy weaponry is withdrawn “may need to be visited again and again by the mission for obvious reasons – for credible verification,” Bociurkiw said. “It is not enough to be invited to follow a removal process, it has to be complete. Like the Minsk agreements it is not a shopping list, you can’t pick and choose.”

A MANDATE TO MONITOR

Many in the Ukrainian capital are distrustful of the OSCE. A sticking point is that Russian monitors take part in OSCE patrols, because the Russian Federation is not an official party to the conflict, whereas Ukrainians do not A prime time broadcast of political programme ‘the X­Files’ on Ukrainian cable channel 1+1, which accused the OSCE of Russian bias, has compounded this problem, according to Iryna Ivashko of the International Centre for Policy Studies in Kiev. An incident in September in which two separatist fighters got into an SMM vehicle has been used as evidence of supposed pro­Russian bias.

The OSCE admitted to and apologised for this incident. Bociurkiw said “I don’t know I’d agree there is widespread cynicism and distrust,” describing ‘dialogue facilitation’ as one of the Mission’s most important background roles. “We’ll soon have been almost a year in Ukraine, and the contribution of the mission is widely known and appreciated,” he said, adding that the OSCE has an active presence active in Kharkiv and Lviv as well as the capital and war­torn eastern regions.

SWIFT AND DECISIVE

Within the international community there has been increased scepticism of the durability of the Minsk agreements. Ilkka Kanerva, president of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, said in Copenhagen yesterday "I am profoundly disturbed by the illegal separatists' continuing refusal to grant unlimited, safe access to OSCE monitors on the ground in Ukraine and their violations of the Minsk Package of Measures.  “By extension, I am also disturbed by Russia's apparent unwillingness to publicly insist that the rebels immediately allow the monitors access, stop all ceasefire violations and withdraw all heavy weapons. Any attempts by the rebels to threaten the city of Mariupol must be met with a swift and decisive response by the international community.”

It remains to be seen whether the current lull in fighting is temporary, or a lasting ceasefire under the Minsk protocols can be reached. General Philip Breedlove, NATO's top commander, said on February 20. "it is a ceasefire in name only".

source: Joseph d'Urso filed this report from Kiev for commonspace.eu

photo: The Spokesperson of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine,  Michael Bociurkiw at a brieifng in Kiev on Thursday, 26 February 2015.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)