Leaders prepare for meeting as war of words continues

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials continued to exchange sharp words ahead of a meeting of the Presidents of the two countries. The Foreign Minister of Armenia, Edward Nalbandian confirmed that the meeting will take place when speaking at a Press Conference in Yerevan yesterday (16 January), but refused to say where and when the meeting will be held. Earlier reports had suggested that the meeting will take place next week in Sochi and will be hosted once again by the Russian President Dimitri Medvedev.

Ahead of the meeting the two sides have continued exchanging sharp words and the situation is also tense on the line of contact separating the two sides.

Armenian sources claimed that Azerbaijan violated the cease fire ninety times on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, firing more than 1200 shots, and that in the last week guns and snipers had been used. Earlier Azerbaijan had stated that five of its soldiers were killed by the Armenian side in October and November of last year.

The OSCE Special Representative of the Chairman in Office and his staff were today expected to conduct monitoring of the line of contact. However many consider that this monitoring, involving only three individuals is far from enough. The Armenian side has accused Azerbaijan of blocking the allocation of further financial resources that would enable more monitors to be engaged. According to a statement by the Armenian self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Foreign Ministry "on December 22, 2011, the OSCE Permanent Council approved the unified Budget of the organization for 2012. Along with this, the Permanent Council discussed a request to increase the funding for the Office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office to ensure sufficient resources to investigate potential incidents on the Line of Contact..." The statement claims that  "the OSCE member-states supported the idea of increasing the funds for the Office of the Chairman in Office Personal Representative. It was the Azerbaijani delegation that opposed the idea explaining its position by the fact that it could not approve additional funding for the Office until a final agreement on the details of the mechanism of the incidents' investigation was achieved".

The statement said that "This once again shows that Azerbaijan is not interested in the investigation of incidents on the line of contact, since it will prove that it is the Azerbaijani party that regularly provokes incidents, aggravating hostility and distrust of the parties towards each other and driving the negotiation process to a deadlock".

Similar accusations were also made by the Armenian Foreign Minister in his press conference in Yerevan.

This prompted a response from the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry, whose spokesperson Elman Abdullayev dismissed accusations by Armenia that it is hampering creation of a mechanism to investigate violations of the cease-fire. "The biggest problem is the occupation of Azerbaijani territory by Armenia. It is Armenia that occupies our lands and kills Azerbaijani civilians, even children. There is a need to investigate the murders committed by snipers. We would also like to know whether Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian is planning to hold a fair and honest investigation into the numerous murders of Azerbaijani civilians by Armenian snipers," Abdullayev said. The spokesman expressed regret that "Yerevan is not constructive on resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict".

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "It has become a common feature that ahead of meetings  of the Presidents the sides engage in a war of words to show that they are entering the negotiations from a position of strength. This often contributes towards creating a bad atmosphere in the negotiations. On this occasion there are even less expectations then usual that the meeting between the two Presidents will lead to a breakthrough in the negotiations. The sides should however at least consider a "propaganda cease fire" ahead of the meeting to give themselves and their citizens an opportunity to reflect more calmly on the issues at hand."

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: The town of Agdam in Nagorno-Karabakh in ruins for the last two decades (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Aden under curfew, as problem in Yemen's south deepens

Aden under curfew, as problem in Yemen's south deepens

The port city of Aden, in Yemen's south, has been put under curfew, as the rift in the country between  the Saudi led coalition which  backs Yemen's presidential governing council, and the southern forces led by the Southern Transitional Council (STC), deepens. Abdul Rahman al-Mahrami, a member of the Yemeni Presidential Governing Council and commander of the al-Amalik brigades, has ordered a curfew in the temporary capital, Aden, "to maintain security". "A curfew has been imposed throughout Aden Governorate from 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., in accordance with the instructions of Commander Abdul Rahman al-Mahrami, a member of the Presidential Management Council," the statement said. It states that only security and military personnel, as well as medical and technical teams with approved permits, will be allowed to move in the area during these hours. Yemen's presidential council, which is backed by Saudi Arabia and which already is in a struggle with the Houthi Movement in the north of the country who also occupy the capital Sanaa, two days ago issued an order for the arrest of the head of the Southern Transitional Council (STC),, Aidarous al Zubaidi. The STC have wide support among people in the South, and advocate that South Yemen restores its independence. The coalition warned of further escalation in Aden, long regarded as an STC stronghold, as the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) chief accused STC leader Aidarous Al Zubaidi of “high treason” and announced the revocation of his membership in the governing body. The moves mark a sharp escalation in tensions within the anti-Houthi camp, despite National Shield Forces, rivals of the STC and former allies, having recently retaken control of Hadhramaut and Mahra from southern fighters. The STC’s takeover of the two regions last month angered Saudi Arabia and contributed to igniting the current internal conflict. (click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Analysis
Analysis: Why what happens in Greenland matters

Analysis: Why what happens in Greenland matters

The snap elections for the parliament of Greenland last Tuesday (6 April 2021) attracted unusual interest from major powers who have been watching the political and economic impact of the election results on their interests in the Arctic region. Among them, the Chinese, who have invested in the Kvanefjeld mine on the island. Maximiliaan van Lange analyses the background to the recent Greenlandic general elections, and the Island's geostrategic position in the Arctic in this article for commonspace.eu.