Gabala Facility symbol of Russian dilemma.The importance of the facility is now more political than military.

The Russian military radar facility in the Azerbaijani region of Gabala is fast becoming a symbol of the Russian dilemma in how to manage relations with its neighbours. Gabala is the only Russian military facility left in Azerbaijan and the Russians are keen to hold on to it for political more then military reasons. The agreement on the facility expires at the end of this year, and negotiations for its renewal have been going on for more than a year.

The latest reports in the Russian media suggest that differences in the negotiations have arisin over the length of the new agreement. Russia wants a 49 year agreement, similar to the one it signed recently with Armenia for military facilities there.  Agreements for 49 years have also been signed to secure Russian military facilities in the Georgian secessionist territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

Many however have criticised the length of these agreements and the implication that the facilities are permanent rather than temporary. Azerbaijan reportedly, only wants to sign a short term agreement of 5-7 years for Gabala.

It is not clear where the ngeotiations are with regards to two other contentious issue: the cost of the rent and the Azerbaijani demand to make Gabala a dual use facility, enabling Azerbaijan to benefit from the data of the facility. Both issues were mentioned earlier this year when negotiations were ongoing between the Defence Ministries of the two countries.

For different reasons neither the Russian nor the Azerbaijani government want to escalate the problem, and the negotiations are being held outside the public eye. But Gabala has become an increasingly interesting topic to the Russian media. One of the reasons is that parallel to the inter-governmental negotiations another process is ongoing which is likely aimed at cutting costs at the facility.

Yesterday's issue of Nezavisimaya Gazeta carried a front page article by Viktor Litovkin headlined "Gabala's female revolt" in which he says that the wives of Russian officers working at the Gabala radar facility in Azerbaijan have complained to the president about the Defence Ministry's plans to close a local kindergarten and school. The closures are part of a plan to reduce the number of personnel at the facility.

At a time when the Russian military is embarked on an ambitious programme of streamlining and modernisation it finds itself having to deal with similar situations like Gabala throughout the former Soviet space and beyond, where the political significance of the facility now outweigh the military considerations.

In the end the issue of Gabala will be resolved not on military considerations but on political ones. The result will tell us a lot about where relations between Russia and Azerbaijan stand at the moment.

source:commonspace.eu

photo: The Russian Radar facility at Gabala (archive photo)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian leader meets Putin in the Kremlin

Armenian prime minister, Nikol Pashinyan, met at the Kremlin in Moscow, on Wednesday 1, April, with Russian president Vladimir Putin. The current state and prospects of Russian-Armenian strategic partnership and alliance, integration cooperation in the Eurasian region, and current issues on the regional agenda, in particular the development of economic and transport-logistics ties in the South Caucasus, were discussed, according to the Kremlin website. In his remarks before the meeting, Prime Minister Pashinyan said our relations with the Russian Federation are very deep, they are very important to us, and, in my opinion, they are developing dynamically in the context of the new realities in our region, when peace has finally been established between Armenia and Azerbaijan. And I think this has a positive impact on our relations with the Russian Federation, because for the first time since our independence, we have a railway connection with the Russian Federation. We import goods from Russia via Azerbaijan by rail. I hope we will also export in the near future. This, of course, strengthens our traditional economic ties, and it strengthens our ties within the Eurasian Economic Union. Regarding the European Union, of course, we know that, in principle, membership in the two associations is incompatible. But what we're doing and the agenda we have, at least for now, are compatible. That's a fact. And as long as there's an opportunity to combine these agendas, we will. And when processes develop to the point where a decision must be made, I'm confident that we, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia, will make that decision. Of course, in this context, our relations with the Russian Federation have never been and never will be in question, because, as I have already said, these ties and relations are very deep and not subject to discussion. (read the report in full by clicking the image at the top).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)