Deaths, Diplomacy and Dialogue: a long day in Armenia-Azerbaijan relations

The complex relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan played themselves out yesterday in separate, seemingly unconnected events that highlighted many of the facets of this relationship.

Early in the morning reports started coming in of a major military clash in the Northern sector of the international border between the two countries. The Armenian Ministry of Defence then released information that three of its soldiers had been killed and six seriously injured when they tried to repel an Azerbaijani advance into Armenian territory near the villages of Berdavan and Chinari in the Tavush Region. Armenian sources said that they had stoped Azerbaijani forces trying to occupy their positions.

"The sabotage advance was halted and the enemy was repelled, suffering casualties," read an Armenian Defense Ministry statement. "The Armenian Armed Forces control the situation along the line of contact, carrying out actions commensurate with the situation," it said without providing details.

Within hours the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry had issued a counter statement in which they denied that their forces were involved in any clashes with Armenian forces at all, according to Radio Liberty, although some Azerbaijani media, including APA, were saying that Azerbaijan had prevented "a provocation attempt by the Armenian Army on the front line".

An Armenia based foreign diplomat who was travelling in the region wrote on facebook of a grim atmosphere as villagers prepared to bury the dead.

In the early afternoon the plane of US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton who is currently touring the region, landed in Yerevan. By this time Armenian political commentators writing on a number of blogs and news websites, were connecting the incidents in Tavush with her visit, saying that this was Azerbaijan's attempt to frustrate any peace efforts. The same message was repeated by Armenian Foreign Minister Nalbandian in his press conference with Clinton later that evening. "Azerbaijani actions threaten the Karabakh settlement talks as well as regional stability, and official Baku is responsible for consequences of its actions,” Nalbandian said.

Clinton herself mentioned the incident in the press Conference. Refering to her meeting with Armenia President Serzh Sargsyan Clinton said

"Of course, the president and I had a serious discussion of Nagorno-Karabakh, including the most recent incidents along the front lines. While I had only just learned of these incidents, I am very concerned about the danger of escalation of tensions and the senseless deaths of young soldiers and innocent civilians. The use of force will not resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and therefore force must not be used. And we are calling on everyone to renounce force as well as refraining from violence. I assured the president that I would make these points in Baku when I am there the day after tomorrow.

Now, these incidents underscore the necessity to try to keep making progress on the peace process. As a co-chair of the Minsk Group, the United States is committed to working with all the parties to find a way forward. And I am very committed that there has to be a way forward. And it’s not only the actions of leaders; it must be the actions of citizens as well to try to find a way to enable people of the region to live together in peace and dignity."

In the meantime as all this was going on in Moscow another significant event got under way as a Russian sponsored public diplomacy event, involving the heads of Armenian and Azerbaijani media outlets started at the office of “Rossisyskaya Gazeta”. Various reports from the meeting suggest that it went well and in a good atmosphere. 

According to Azerbaijani ambassador in Moscow, Polad Bulbuloglu at the meeting the sides expressed their positions and views. “The common view was that journalism should be patriotic but not with a tendency. State figures, peoples’ representatives should not be humiliated. Discussions should continue within frame of normal journalism. The sides agreed to form a permanent group for conducting meetings. It was noted that the meeting will work in favor of strengthening relations. It was also noted that we live in this region and nobody will leave this region.” 

With deaths, diplomacy and dialogue happening simultaneously it is difficult to conclude if this was a good day or a bad day for Armenian-Azerbaijani relations. It was however one more reflection of the complexity of the conflict between them that continues to play itself out on different fronts and in different contexts.

source: commonspace.eu with reporting from APA, RFE/RL, and the US State Department.

photo: Hilary Clinton and Armenia Foreigfn Minister Nalbandian addressing a joint Press Conference in Yerevan on 4 June 2012. (picture courtesy of the Press Service of the Armenian Foreign Ministry).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)