David Karabekyan: A view from Stepanakert on the deployment of peacekeepers and returnees

"The failure in the attempt to reach agreement on the Basic Principles of the Karabakh conflict settlement during the meeting of the Armenian, Azerbaijani and Russian presidents in Kazan is conditioned by a number of reasons. David Karabekyan, an analyst from Karabakh, told ArmInfo correspondent in Stepanakert.

 According to him, this failure is conditioned first of all by the ambitions of official Baku, which is afraid of ambiguous response of the Azerbaijani society to adoption of a number of commitments to Armenia, Karabakh and OSCE by the Azeri authorities, as well as by the stalemate situation in the state of interests of the regional and world powers - the authors of the regional and world policy.

The matter concerns the interests of the United States, Iran, Russia, Turkey, which obviously coincide with certain interests of the conflicting countries' elites.

"As a consequence, we have artificial freezing of the status quo in the conflict zone and trigging of the peace process. Like Russia, Iran is seriously concerned over the prospect of deployment of a foreign military contingent in the conflict zone", he said.

According to him, due to a number of mistakes Armenia and Karabakh have found themselves in such a situation that "even in case of recognition of Karabakh people's right to self-determination, the NKR faces the prospect to find itself among the peacekeepers and Azerbaijani refugees."

The first step to ensure the end of the deadlock of the whole negotiation process is to give an unbiased analysis of the mistakes and to condemn the policy that gives birth to these mistakes he concluded.

Source: Arminfo

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

There was violence and mayhem across the Pakistani Indian Ocean province of Baluchistan on Friday and Saturday (30-31 January), as separatist insurgents attacked multiple government targets, in a co-ordinated attack in a number of towns and cities. Security forces conducted a large-scale counter-terrorism operation across Baluchistan following a series of coordinated attacks targeting multiple districts, killing civilians and security personnel, according to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) of the Pakistani government. "The operation, conducted over two days, resulted in the deaths of 133 insurgents, including suicide bombers, while 15 security personnel were killed during intense engagements", according to the government source. The attacks took place in Quetta, Mastung, Nushki, Dalbandin, Kharan, Panjgur, Tump, Gwadar and Pasni. "The assaults were aimed at destabilising peace in the province and undermining development by targeting law enforcement agencies and innocent civilians", the Pakistani government said.  The Pakistani government said the attacks were launched by “Indian sponsored Fitna al Hindustan,” a reference to the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), saying intelligence reports confirmed the violence was orchestrated and directed by militant leaders operating from outside Pakistan, who were in direct communication with attackers during the assaults. The BLA also issued a statement earlier in the day, saying it had launched what it called “Operation Herof 2.0” and claiming responsibility for attacks in multiple locations. Pakistani officials describe BLA militants as Indian proxies, a charge New Delhi denies.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)