Commentary: Central Asia is safer together

Whilst it is often the case that the five Central Asian republics are lumped together and seen by outsiders as one group, in truth there are between them huge differences, a lot of competition, some rivalry, and every now and then, some conflict, writes the commonspace.eu editorial team.

The big two, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, are often perceived to be in competition with each other. The two have different strengths and weaknesses, which means that if they play their cards right they can turn this competition into a healthy collaborative relationship with a win-win situation.

This is what appears to be happening at the moment.

Kazakh President, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, met his Uzbek counterpart Shavkat Mirziyoyev in Shymkent on 3 March to discuss “trade and prospects for strengthening allied relations between the two countries”. The Kazakh presidential administration described the meeting as “informal”.

The two leaders appear to have two priorities. The first is to co-ordinate positions in the face of what appears to be considerable pressure from Moscow for the two countries to tow the line and stay in the fold, at a time when the Kremlin feels embattled due to the ongoing war in Ukraine. 

The second priority of the two presidents seems to be a desire to ensure that the many documents on major areas of co-operation, including the treaty on allied relations and an agreement on border demarcation, which they signed during Tokayev’s state visit to Tashkent in December 2022, are realised and fulfilled.  The 40 agreements signed in December envisioned 40 economic initiatives worth $2.5 billion. 

The official statement at the end of the meeting said that: 

“in Shymkent, the presidents focused on trade and economic cooperation, including opportunities for strengthening mutual trade, attracting investments, and expanding collaboration in the industrial, energy, agricultural, transportation, and logistics sectors. They also exchanged views on regional issues.”

Both countries are very cautiously exploring political reforms, and more boldly, seeking economic reform. The two leaders are firmly entrenched, but are vulnerable to threats, including from their own elites. They appear to be developing strong personal bonds, which can be very useful, especially in times of crisis.

The meeting in Shymkent came immediately after the two leaders received in their respective capitals US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken. Making a point of going to both Astana and Tashkent, Blinken once more emphasised the importance of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan in the region, and no doubt encouraged the two to increase the co-operation between them.

Image
a
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken meets with Central Asian foreign ministers last week. westernslopenow.com

Blinken signals a firm but nuanced US approach to Central Asia

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Central Asia last week, first going to Astana where he met President Tokayev and where he participated in the regular meeting of the C5+1 – a forum bringing together the five Central Asian nations with the United States. He then went on to Tashkent to meet President Mirziyoyev.

In the region Blinken took the opportunity to restate the US position towards the Central Asian republics namely, “enduring support for their sovereignty, for their independence, for their territorial integrity”, and US “determination that each be able to determine their own futures consistent with those principles.”

But Blinken was quick to also add the economic dimension of the US relationship with the region. He stated:

“a big part of the work that we’re doing here is to help the region diversify trade relationships, to build new partnerships and relationships with other countries, including with the United States, so they’re not dependent on any one country or any one source for trade and investment, and at the same time to increase trade and investment within Central Asia itself.  There’s a very strong potential market here, and the more connectivity we have among the countries of Central Asia, the more collaboration we have, the stronger that market’s going to be, the more investment it’s going to attract from outside of Central Asia.”

Blinken however made it clear that the US will move cautiously:

“Central Asia is in a complicated part of the world with longstanding relationships with different countries based on history, based on geography, and that’s something that we well understand. But I think we also see each of these countries looking to multiply and deepen their relationships and partnerships with other countries around the world.  And in that, the United States wants to be a steadfast partner and a partner that works with them to create new opportunities for people in this region and new opportunities for us to work together.”

The visit of the US Secretary of State to Central Asia was as timely as it was important. As the region works to break out of its Russian straightjacket, an intelligent and well calibrated US approach is hugely important.

Image
a
Non-Aligned Movement meeting on COVID-19 recovery on 2 March 2023 in Baku. APA.

 Guests of honour in Baku

On 2 March, Azerbaijan hosted a meeting of the contact group of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) focusing on the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic. Azerbaijan currently holds the Chairmanship of the Movement, which has around 120 member states, mostly in the global south. Whilst most delegations were led by the vice-presidents, prime ministers or foreign ministers, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan were represented by their presidents, and they were clearly the guests of honour at the event.

Baku has been seeking for some time to nurture relations with the Central Asian republics and it appears to be making progress. Azerbaijan is keen to consolidate connectivity links with Central Asia, and to provide the alternative corridor for the export of energy and other goods from the region to European markets. But there is also a political angle. Azerbaijan has generally been supported by Central Asian countries in its dispute with Armenia. It also sees the Central Asian republics as allies in its efforts to manage relations with Moscow. 

So the presence in Baku of the presidents of Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan was very well received by the Azerbaijani leadership, and reflects a broader sense of increased co-operation between Azerbaijan and the Central Asian region.

source: commonspace.eu editorial team
photo: Akorda press service
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)