The best and the worst. Freedom House paints bleak picture of media in South Caucasus

The stark difference in the performance of countries in Eastern and Central Europe and Eurasia in the field of human rights and freedom of expression was highlighted in a report by the respected American organisatkion Freedom House just released. Of the 33 countries and territories in the region that the report looks at it characterises only 28% as free. This figure is lower than the world average. 

Of the 197 countries and territories assessed during 2011, a total of 66 (33.5 percent) were rated Free, 72 (36.5 percent) were rated Partly Free, and 59 (30 percent) were rated Not Free. This balance marks a shift toward the Partly Free category compared with the edition covering 2010, which featured 68 Free, 65 Partly Free, and 63 Not Free countries and territories.

In its 2012 report Freedom House states:

"Countries in this region range from among the best to among the worst in the world with regard to respect for human rights. Most states in the non-Baltic former Soviet Union rank at or near the bottom of Freedom House’s ratings for political rights and civil liberties, while the democracies of Central Europe have established institutions that generally protect most fundamental rights, despite some recent backsliding."

In the report's Global Freedom Rankings for Media Freedom the three South Caucasus countries are placed way down in the second half of the table. Georgia is ranked in 110 place as partly free together with Bangladesh and Mauritania, Azerbaijan in 172 as not free together with Russia and Zimbabwe.

Armenia is placed in 149 place as not free.

Commenting on the report, Armenian former foreign minister and candidate in next Sunday's Parliamentary elections Vardan Oskanian said:

"It is sad that Armenian media are rated as ‘Not Free’ and rank 149th in a list of 197 countries – between Angola and Pakistan. If Armenia’s media are not even rated as “partly free,” any democracy is out of the question."

According to Tert.am Oscanian said that "The sooner Armenia’s TV channels enjoy as much freedom as news websites the sooner Armenia will become a normal state."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "Whilst the Freedom House report is not a perfect exercise in gauging press freedom around the world it does capture the essence of the situation and broadly reflects the reality on the ground. Media performance in the post Soviet countries are now meticulously recorded by a range of local and international sources, and all agree that there are serious problems that both impact and reflect the political processes in these countries.

In the South Caucasus the Freedom House report reflects the problems that have been highlighted in many previous reports on the same subject. For Armenia and Georgia the ability of the media to operate freely during the election campaigns scheduled for this year and next year will determine their future rankings not only in the Freedom House reports but also in the wider global opinion. Azerbaijan which is ranked the lowest of the three in the Freedom House report has no elections this year. Its treatment of journalists is however coming under increasing criticism, and this is likely to increase.

However if any one of the three countries is able to make a breakthrough and have real media freedom, the position of the two others will be unsustainable. This is what to watch out for in the future."

source: commonspace.eu with Freedom House

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)