IS BAKU THE NEW SPY CAPITAL OF THE WORLD? London Times compares it to Oslo in World War 1 and Casablanca in the World War 2

There has always been a cosmopolitan feel to Baku, Azerbaijan's capital city by the Caspian City. An important stop on the old silk road, a centre for oil magnates at the start of the 20th century and a contemporary hub of buisness and cultural activity Baku is a bustling and tolerant city and the city has for a long time attracted a large number of foreigners. Azerbaijan's recent oil wealth has helped transform the city beyond recognition over a very short period.

It seems however that there is more going on in Baku than meets the eye. The London Times yesterday carried a report that compares modern day Baku to Oslo during World War 1 and Casablanca in World War 2 and suggests that it is now the spy capital of the world. The report speaks of dozens of Mossad agents and hundreds of Iranian agents operating openly in the country and watching each other. The report suggests that various intelligence gathering facilities have been established in Azerbaijan in recent years, including two by the Americans targeted primarily at Iran. The report says that whilst it is unlikely that Azerbaijan will ever be used as a staging post for a large military attack on Iran it is serving the purpose of gathering information on Iran, and it describes the region of Azerbaijan bordering Iran as a "grey zone" full of spies and spies watching spies.

The Azerbaijani government has yet to comment on the report but the Times story comes amidst incresing speculation about relations between Iran and its Caucasus neighbours.

source: commonspace.eu with The Times (London)

photo: The Maiden Tower, a historical landmark of Baku the Capital of Azerbaijan

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)