Azerbaijan considers adopting law "on occupied territories"

A proposal to adopt a seperate law on Karabakh has been submitted to the Parliament of Azerbaijan, following a discussion in the Parliament a few days ago during which some MPs criticised comments by the Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, whilst he was visiting Yerevan.

"If Azerbaijan has a single law on occupied territories, Armenian separatists in Nagorno-Karabakh won't be able to participate in any economic programs", a member of the Parliamentary Committee on Security and Defence, Zahid Oruj, told Trend News Agency on Tuesday. He stressed that it will also stop international organisations from allocating  funds to Nagorno-Karabakh.

"The Armenian separatists of Karabakh establish relations with various foreign organizations. Through the embassies abroad Azerbaijan sends notes, requests. But after the adoption of a specific law on Karabakh as a territory of Azerbaijan its sovereign rights will be taken into account implicitly, and any foreign, economic and political ties of Karabakh will not be recognized," he said.

Under the provisions of the law, it will not be allowed to sign any contracts with any of the structures with prejudice to Karabakh, any international or national documents relating to the Karabakh will be declared invalid, the MP said.

Often citizens of various foreign countries, culture and art workers, and sometimes MPs go to Karabakh, Oruj said. Their names are entered only in the "black list" prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic.

"I have prepared a similar bill on Karabakh," a member of the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy and State Building, MP Gudrat Hasanguliyev told Trend on Tuesday.

He said he has repeatedly raised this issue at previous sessions of Parliament, and stressed the importance of adopting a law on the occupied territories. He said the prepared bill will be submitted to the committee.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "Georgia adopted a similar law, following the 2008 war with Russia, and it was the subject of a lot of controversy and tensions with the international community. The law was eventually watered down, but many still feel that it is neither helpful for Georgia, nor for the efforts to resolve the problems in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. What it does is it makes both territories even more dependant on Russia, it isolates them from broader international processes and it undermines efforts at building confidence between the communities across the conflict divide. A similar law in Azerbaijan will have the same effect and worse. Azerbaijan already has strict policies with regards to engagement with the de facto authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh. These policies are not always implemented evenly and there is a need for more transparency on the matter.

Commonspace.eu political editor added "Many of the concerns of the Governments of Georgia and Azerbaijan can already be addressed through international law and do not need a specific domestic legislation. If the Parliament of Azerbaijan decides to take forward the idea of a seperate law on this issue it should consult extensively with the international community in order to ensure that the legislation will not create harmful and unexpected side effects."

source: commonspace.eu with Trend News Agency

picture: The Parliament of Azerbaijan (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular