Is Armenia introducing new ingredients to the Karabakh negotiations?

The Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian is a frequent visitor to foreign countries, as his job demands. This week he was however on an unusual trip - he visited Nagorno-Karabakh for consultations with the leadership of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. Whilst Nalbandian is a key person in the Armenian team negotiating on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict he is not the usual person who deals with relations between the Armenian leadership and the leadership of NKR. His visit was therefore followed with interest by analysts watching the region.

In Stepanakert Nalbandian met with the president of the self declared republic Bako Sahakyan to brief him about the results of the recent meeting in Paris between the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair and the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Nalbandian later told the media, “We exchanged views on the ongoing negotiation process toward settlement of the Karabakh issue. The three Co-Chairs also are holding permanent consultations with Artsakh’s leadership."

The Armenian Foreign Minister also added "I would like to reiterate that the key issue cannot be resolved without Nagorno-Karabakh’s participation. The fundamental principles cannot be considered finally-agreed-upon without Nagorno-Karabakh’s approval. And, after the agreement upon the fundamental principles, the designing of a peace accord is impossible without NK’s participation.” 

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "This was a carefully choreographed visit with a a precise message. It is likely to have had several objectives. The first, ahead of the presidential elections in NKR the leadership in Yerevan may have felt the need to be seen consulting with the NKR leadership since in the campaign, Bako Sahakyan is being accused of not being active enough in pushing for direct NKR participation in the peace negotiations. However, there is also a more worrying possibility that Armenia is re-positioning itself ahead of what is likely to be a next push by the international community to bring settlement to the conflict.  By insisting that "the fundamental principles cannot be considered finally agreed upon without Nagorno-Karabakh's approval" the Armenian side may be trying to give itself a chance to revisit the fundamental principles even after they have been agreed by the official Armenian and Azerbaijani sides. This development, if true, would have caused considerable discomfort to the international mediators. But it is too early to say if this is simply election posturing for the benefit of the current NKR leadership, or something more strategic."

source: commonspace.eu with Armenian media

photo: Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian with the president of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Bako Sahakyan

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)