Is Armenia introducing new ingredients to the Karabakh negotiations?

The Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian is a frequent visitor to foreign countries, as his job demands. This week he was however on an unusual trip - he visited Nagorno-Karabakh for consultations with the leadership of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. Whilst Nalbandian is a key person in the Armenian team negotiating on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict he is not the usual person who deals with relations between the Armenian leadership and the leadership of NKR. His visit was therefore followed with interest by analysts watching the region.

In Stepanakert Nalbandian met with the president of the self declared republic Bako Sahakyan to brief him about the results of the recent meeting in Paris between the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair and the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Nalbandian later told the media, “We exchanged views on the ongoing negotiation process toward settlement of the Karabakh issue. The three Co-Chairs also are holding permanent consultations with Artsakh’s leadership."

The Armenian Foreign Minister also added "I would like to reiterate that the key issue cannot be resolved without Nagorno-Karabakh’s participation. The fundamental principles cannot be considered finally-agreed-upon without Nagorno-Karabakh’s approval. And, after the agreement upon the fundamental principles, the designing of a peace accord is impossible without NK’s participation.” 

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment: "This was a carefully choreographed visit with a a precise message. It is likely to have had several objectives. The first, ahead of the presidential elections in NKR the leadership in Yerevan may have felt the need to be seen consulting with the NKR leadership since in the campaign, Bako Sahakyan is being accused of not being active enough in pushing for direct NKR participation in the peace negotiations. However, there is also a more worrying possibility that Armenia is re-positioning itself ahead of what is likely to be a next push by the international community to bring settlement to the conflict.  By insisting that "the fundamental principles cannot be considered finally agreed upon without Nagorno-Karabakh's approval" the Armenian side may be trying to give itself a chance to revisit the fundamental principles even after they have been agreed by the official Armenian and Azerbaijani sides. This development, if true, would have caused considerable discomfort to the international mediators. But it is too early to say if this is simply election posturing for the benefit of the current NKR leadership, or something more strategic."

source: commonspace.eu with Armenian media

photo: Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian with the president of the self declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Bako Sahakyan

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.