Can Georgia provide the region with the economic stimulus it desperately requires?

Georgia's Prime Minister, Giorgi Kvirikashvili is a man with a plan. Kvirikashvili has emerged from the recent parliamentary elections, held on 8 October, energised and empowered, as he pushes forward an ambitious development agenda for Georgia which boldly claims will turn it into a prosperous and successful country.

Once the last part of the election process is out of the way on Sunday (30th October), Kvirikashvili will put together his new government. Kvirikashvili's Georgian Dream party is expected to have a comfortable majority in the new parliament, enabling the prime minister to push ahead with his plans without delay.

Throughout the campaign, whilst others squabbled on issues of dubious importance and relevance to the current Georgian reality, Kvirikashvili kept the focus on the economy, and the plan to give Georgia the necessary breakthrough needed to ensure its future prosperity.

Kvirikashvili's plan, which he speaks about often, entails four elements which includes new tax incentives and reforms, infrastructure plans, governance reforms and an overhaul of the education system.

The plan is hugely ambitious. On infrastructure for example it envisages that the Government will spend $3.5 billion to build and reconstruct roads and highways. What the Georgian government is calling the Spatial Arrangement Plan also includes rehabilitating railway stations, ports and tourist infrastructure. It also envisions new airports - all part of a strategy to turn Georgia into an international transit and business hub.

One of the most ambitious projects within the Spatial Arrangement Plan is the Anaklia Deep Sea Port project, which will create a new, faster maritime corridor between China and Europe, and help restore the historic Silk Road. The Anaklia Development Consortium, which has been entrusted with the project, will invest $2.5 billion USD and develop the Port on a build, operate and transfer basis, allowing larger ships to enter Georgian waters for the first time, thus expanding the country's export potential and ability to act as a trade corridor.

Observers of the Georgian political scene say that this is the first time in modern Georgian history that a government is making the economy the most important aspect of its policy, approaching it with a holistic plan. Georgia needs this. In many respects the Georgian economy has been underperforming - lacking investment and good management, as well as the sound legal framework necessary for both. All this is now being redressed. The extensive and speedy reforms that Georgia has been implementing as part of the process of becoming an EU Associate state provide a very good basis on which the new economic plans can be founded. Results may not be immediate, but already positive signs can be seen. Georgia's economic growth is estimated by the IMF to reach 3.4 percent in 2016, and 5.2 percent in 2017.

Trade between Georgia and EU countries between January and September 2016 reached $2.5 billion. The latest figures from the National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat) showed external trade turnover between Georgia and EU countries grew 10 percent year-on-year. Increasing exports, especially in areas such as agriculture, is going to be crucial if Georgia's ambitions plans are to succeed.

All this is not only good news for Georgia, but also for the whole region. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan are facing tough decisions as they deal with economic challenges. In Azerbaijan the sudden and sharp fall in the price of oil has forced the government to do some hard thinking on the country's future economic model. The cushion that the oil revenues had provided over the last decade is no longer there. The Azerbaijani economy needs to grow fast if a slump is to be avoided. At the moment it is shrinking due to a sharp decline in the construction industry

In Armenia the economy faces serious structural problems, and the new prime minister has a big task in front of him as he tries to implement reforms which will require destroying the monopoly on sectors of the economy enjoyed by people close to the government.

Georgia in many ways offers a vision for the two countries - one that cannot be copied into the completely different governance and economic models that exist in Armenia and Azerbaijan, but one which still can inspire.

But Georgia may also, in the foreseeable future, be able to provide the region with the economic stimulus that it desperately requires. Investors like project clusters, and those investing in Georgia are likely to look at options in neighbouring countries too. An improved infrastructural framework in Georgia will also greatly help both Armenia and Azerbaijan to send their exports to international markets. The current regional situation, resulting from the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Nagorno-Karabakh, does not allow a normal regional co-operation arrangement, which the South Caucasus needs and deserves, to emerge yet. Georgia however should set its sights on ambitious bilateral economic co-operation agreements with the two countries, introducing as much as possible common elements in both agreements that in due course can form the basis on which a regional framework can be based. This will require, time , patience and some resources, but the Georgian government may find that this is one investment that it cannot do without.

 

source: Caucasus Concise Analytical Team

photo: Georgian Prime Minister Giorgi Kvirikashvili, addressing an investment forum in London in May 2016 (picture courtesy of the press service of the Prime Minister of Georgia).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)