Baku's decision to close OSCE Office sharply criticised in Vienna.

The Permanent Council of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) met in Vienna on Monday to discuss the decision of the Government of Azerbaijan to close down the office of the organisation in Baku. The Permanent Council consists of representatives of the fifty-seven member states. The extraordinary meeting was called by the Serbian Chairmanship of the OSCE.

Addressing the Permanent Council, the representative of the European Union, speaking on behalf of the twenty-eight EU member states, as well as, Albania, Bosnia-Herzogovina, Iceland, Montenegro and Norway said that the announcement of the Government of Azerbaijan "came as a complete surprise, as there were no reasons given in the Note Verbale from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, nor has there been any advance notice of the intention of the Government of Azerbaijan to that effect. Azerbaijan did not consult with participating States prior to that decision".

The EU statement added that a convincing explanation from the Government of Azerbaijan was needed.

The EU statement said,

"Azerbaijan has made important progress in areas such as relating to economic stability and development. Many challenges, however, remain for the full implementation of its OSCE commitments and the mandate of the Project Cocordinator is designed precisely to support Azerbaijan in achieving the necessary reforms and modernization, including in the development of democratic institutions, the rule of law, and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Therefore, in our view, the mandate is not completed. The decision is irreconcilable with the principles of cooperation and confidence building, principles which are at the heart of the OSCE. Closing the Office of the Project Co-ordinator in Baku is a serious step backwards in the cooperation of Azerbaijan with the OSCE. An OSCE field presence is one of the most effective ways to support participating States with implementing their OSCE commitments. The EU strongly believes that discussion of any OSCE field presence and its mandate should take place within the normal cycle of decision-making and within the established bodies and working methods of the Organisation. The EU therefore deplores the decision of the Government of Azerbaijan to terminate the Memorandum of Understanding and requests Azerbaijan to reconsider it with the goal of enabling the Project Co-ordinator to continue their activities without interruption."

You can read the statement of the European Union in full here.

The decision of the government of Azerbaijan was also criticised by the representatives of the United States and Canada. You can read the statement of the representative of the United States in full here.

The matter remains under the consideration of the OSCE Permanent Council.

source: commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament, during its plenary session in Strasbourg, approved the European Commission's proposal to apply a system of trade measures for "Made in Armenia" products, which means there will be a temporary elimination of customs duties on a wide range of products imported from Armenia to the European Union.   The proposal presented by the European Commission was adopted at the plenary session of the Council of Europe with 583 votes in favor, 49 against and 39 abstentions. According to the proposal, the European Union plans to eliminate customs duties on a number of Armenian goods for a period of two years. At the same time, it is planned to establish duty-free import quotas for eight types of Armenian agricultural products. These include grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches, and cucumbers. The draft also provides for safeguard mechanisms that will allow the European Union to intervene, if necessary, if increased imports from Armenia have a negative impact on European producers. This step is due to the restrictions imposed by Russia on a number of important Armenian export products since May 2026. They relate, in particular, to alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, fruits and vegetables, as well as their transit through Russian territory. According to the European Commission, these restrictions have disrupted Armenia's traditional supply chains and significantly limited the country's access to traditional export markets. The situation has had a particularly severe impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as agricultural producers, while creating challenges for Armenia's economic resilience. The EU sees the initiative as a temporary measure to support the Armenian economy and create additional opportunities for exporters to access the EU market. The next step for the proposal is formal approval by the EU Council. The regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Let us recall that on September 2, the Council of the European Union approved the proposal to establish temporary trade liberalization measures for Armenian products and sent the draft to the European Parliament for approval. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)