Azerbaijani official articulates position on key foreign policy issues.

A senior Azerbaijani Government official has articulated the country's position on a number of key foreign policy issues when speaking to journalists on Friday (20 November). Novruz Mammedov, Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration and a key person in President Aliev's foreign policy team, said that a meeting between the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan on the resolution of the Karabakh conflict may still happen before the end of the year, but this was not yet confirmed. He reiterated Azerbaijan's demand for Armenia to withdraw from all Azerbaijani territory, and said this was long overdue. On relations with the European Union Mammedov said that Azerbaijan had refused to sign an Association Agreement with the EU since the document did not refer to the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, but that discussions with the EU on co-operation within a strategic framework were ongoing, and Azerbaijan was willing to move its relations with the EU forward, as long as these were based on the principles of equality and mutual respect.

Novruz Mammedov started by highlighting the importance of Azerbaijan's participation in the G20 Summit in Antalya earlier in the week, where it attended as a special guest of the Turkish presidency of the G20. Mammedov noted that the terrorist attacks in Paris on the eve of the G20 summit, put a spotlight on the event and that the summit had discussed issues that will have global implications for many years to come.

Turning to the Karabakh conflict, Novruz Mammedov said that the time to return Azerbaijani lands occupied by Armenia is long due. Answering a question about the talks heldby the  Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Yerevan and Armenian media speculation that Russia is trying to persuade Armenia to liberate the occupied Azerbaijani districts in exchange for Azerbaijan's consent to join the Eurasian Union Mammadov said that the Armenian side has not realized yet that the more it delays the  in resolving the conflict, the worse it is for it.

"The Armenian leadership, namely, the foreign minister and president, often first agree on one issue and then suddenly change their position during the negotiations," Mammadov was quoted as saying. "The situation changes and previous words and statements then appear to have no significance."

Mammadov said that the essence of all negotiations on Karabakh conflict is that at least 3-5 occupied districts of Azerbaijan must be liberated at first. "According to the Madrid principles, at first, five districts must be released," he said. "These districts must be cleared from mines. Refugees must return there."

The second stage is for determining the format of the Lachin corridor and the issue of liberating two more Azerbaijani districts, Mammadov said.

At the same time, in parallel, earlier or later, a question of placing peacekeeping troops in Nagorno-Karabakh [will be decided], he said. "That is what they want - ensuring safety", Mammadov said.

"The third stage includes the return of refugees to Nagorno-Karabakh, and after a certain time - holding of a referendum as part of the Azerbaijani legislation," he added.

Mammadov also said that Azerbaijan has not seen a fair position on the part of Western countries concerning the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement - in accordance with UN resolutions norms and principles of international law - for a long time. "This complicates the situation," Mammadov said.

Referring to reports that the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet to negotiate on a Karabakh conflict settlement before the end of the year, Mammedov said that a decision has not been made yet. "President Ilham Aliyev's position is that Baku does not avoid such meetings, and is ready for them," he said.

Mammadov said however, that it was necessary to be confident beforehand that conditions  to advance the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict exist. "The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen are trying to organize such a meeting in 2015," he said. "If such a meeting is to take place, we will try to provide information on that a few days in advance. Today, I can't comment on anything."

 The deputy head of the Azerbaijani presidential Administration also addressed issues related to relations with the European Union. Azerbaijan expects these relations to be conducted on the basis of equality and mutual respect, he said. He pointed out that Azerbaijan is one of the countries closely cooperating with the EU.

"Azerbaijan didn't accept the text of the Association Agreement that was proposed to us earlier", he said. "They propose us such an agreement, but unlike similar agreements, for example with Moldova, they do not mention recognition of [Azerbaijan's] territorial integrity."

Novruz Mammedov said that Azerbaijan wants to sign a document on strategic partnership with the European Union. "Azerbaijan has already signed a document on strategic partnership with eight important European countries," he added. If the European Union shows that it is ready for a relationship based on equality and mutual respect, and if the proposed document reflects Azerbaijan's territorial integrity, the country will sign this document.

Taking a swipe at recent controversies in Azerbaijan's relations with western countries Mammedov said that Europe can learn from Azerbaijan's experience in resolving the problems of refugees
"Some 700,000-800,000 refugees who have arrived in Europe with a 400 million population, caused great problems," he said. "The US is now considering not to accept refugees from Syria and Iraq."

Mammadov reminded that in 1990 when Azerbaijan gained independence, it was able to cope with the refugee problem. "During this period, at a time of political instability and weak economy in the country, more than one million refugees and internally displaced people arrived in Azerbaijan. The country's population was just 5-6 million people. However, Azerbaijan coped with this problem," he said.

"Azerbaijan cooperates  with the European Union in the framework of the European Neighborhood Policy, Eastern Partnership," he said. "But they do not stress the work done by Azerbaijan to solve the problems of refugees and internally displaced people. Some organizations of these countries can make statements on various issues related to Azerbaijan several times a year. But they do not talk about the violation of the rights of refugees and internally displaced people."

He said that when such an attitude is shown, and such statements are made, good relations are difficult. "This is the result of the West's errors, and its unfair attitude to these issues," Mammadov said.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that "Novruz Mammedov is a key person in Azerbaijan's Foreign Policy establishment, and although he often speaks to the media, his comments on Friday were more comprehensive and far reaching than usual, and were meant to address criticism that Azerbaijan had become intransigent both in the negotiations on the Karabakh issue in the context of the Minsk Process, and in its negotiations on future relations with the European Union. "The message from Novruz Mammedov was clear: Azerbaijan is willing to engage on both issues, but that its engagement was not unconditional and the framework had to be acceptable.  

Over the last year we have seen a serious deterioration in relations between Azerbaijan and  the European Union and the United States. In his comments Novruz Mammedov could not resist criticising western countries for their attitude, including on Karabakh and on the issue of the displaced persons from the conflict. He did not explain how this western attitude differs from that of Russia, which he hardly mentioned at all.  This notwithstanding Azerbaijan's willingness to remain constructively engaged in both the Karabakh peace negotiations, as well as in negotiations on its contractual arrangements with the European Union, is welcomed. The welfare of Azerbaijan, and of its people, is of significant importance for peace and stability in the Caucasus and in wider Europe and Eurasia. All concerned must now engage with good will and in haste so that progress can be achieved, both on securing lasting peace in Karabakh, as well as on properly institutionalising Azerbaijan's place within the European family of nations."

 

source: Commonspace.eu with TREND News Agency (Baku) and APA News Agency (Baku)

Photo: Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration, and Head of the Foreign Relations Department of the Presidential Administration of Azerbaijan, Novruz Mammedov.

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)