ARMENIA-VETERANS-POSITION

A group of Nagorno-Karabakh war veterans (the former commanders of volunteer groups) has urged President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan to behave as a winner during the Nagorno-Karabakh peace talks, to decline the proposed documents and to answer the question "Why is Russia so much interested in their approval?"

Appearing at a press-conference Thursday on behalf of thousands of their comrades, the leader of the Goyamart party Seryozha Ghazaryan, the president of the Union of Glorious Warriors Grisha Sargsyan and the president of the Union of Nagorno-Karabakh Veterans Yura Mikaelyan expressed concern for the current situation over the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process.

"We demand that the Armenian President and the world community should renounce the three basic settlement principles: territorial integrity, a nation's right to self-determination and nonuse of force, and should further negotiate according to relevant legal documents. There are specific documents saying that Highland (Nagorny) Karabakh and Lowland Karabakh were annexed to Azerbaijan. For the moment, we have liberated just part of our territories.

Consequently, it is the Azerbaijanis rather than we who must give territories back as Azerbaijan is the legal successor of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic (1918-1920), a country than never comprised either Karabakh or Nachichevan," Ghazaryan said.

He said that Armenia will start exchanging - rather than ceding - territories only if Azerbaijan recognizes Nagorno-Karabakh's independence. "We, just like the whole Armenian nation, object to unilateral concessions," Ghazaryan said.

He pointed out that the Armenian President must not act contrary to his Constitution and people if he considers himself a president. "We are ready to repel the enemy and to fulfill all the President's orders," Ghazaryan said.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Despite crisis, Lebanon takes the lead to become first country in the Middle East to abolish the death penalty

Lebanon's parliament has voted to abolish the death penalty, a move that would make it the first country in the Middle East to formally end capital punishment. A majority of MPs in the 128-seat parliament backed the measure on Tuesday (11 August), while Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc voted against it. The legislation will now go to the cabinet before being passed to President Joseph Aoun for signing. The government has already expressed its support for the measure. Lebanon has not carried out an execution since January 2004, although courts have continued to hand down death sentences. Rights groups estimate that more than 78 people remain on death row. Under the new legislation, capital punishment will be replaced with life imprisonment with hard labour. However, the legislation does not yet set out in detail how the new sentence would be enforced. Hard labour is already written into Lebanese law but has rarely been implemented in recent years. The country's financial crisis and overcrowded prisons have limited the authorities' resources and capacity. The latest legislation follows years of campaigning by civil society groups and lawyers for the removal of capital punishment from Lebanese law. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)