Armenia and Azerbaijan closely watch each other. But are they seeing everything, or seeing what Russia wants them to see?

Armenia and Azerbaijan are engaged in massive efforts to monitor each other's military capacities and movements. The two countries have been locked in an unresovled conflict for the last two decades. Whilst major military hostilities ended with a cease fire in 1994 no peace treaty was ever signed, and the two states remain in a state of war. Every now and then the world gets a glimpse into the extent the two countires monitor each other's military activity.

Yesterday, the President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan, visited the National Security Threat Analysis Centre which is part of the National Security Council of Armenia where Centre officials briefed the Armenian leader of the work done and further programs. Of interest is that on this visit Sargsyan was accompanied by the Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty of Organization (CSTO), Nikolay Bordyuzhha, who has become a frequent visitor to Yerevan and by the President of Rostelecom Company Sergey Kalugin, adding to speculation that the president was reviewing new equipment that had been received, or plans to do so.

On the same day, perhaps by coincidence, perhaps not, the commander of Azerbaijan's Air Defense Forces, Major General Altay Mehdiyev, in a rare briefing to the Press, said that Azerbaijan now had sophisticated equipment that "could detect a plane taking off from Armenia's Zvartnots airport after rising 10 meters". The General said that Azerbaijan has the strongest air defense system, which very few countries in the post-Soviet area have. Azerbaijan's system fully covers the air defense of the country", according to the Azerbaijani News Agency APA.

The agency noted that in recent years, Baku has acquired sophisticated anti-aircraft complexes and radiolocation equipment. S300 PMU-2 Favorit anti-craft complexes purchased from Russia in 2011 are most powerful among them, and that all civil and military airplanes of Azerbaijan have already been equipped with IFF (Identification Friend or Foe). It allows the Air Defense Forces to get information about all aircrafts entering the country's air space, according to the source.

In the meantime, another Azerbaijani media outlet, the 1news.az web portal, yesterday also carried a story about the transfer of Russian equipment from the Military base in Gyumri to the Armenian military. Quoting diplomatic sources in Vienna, the portal says that at a recent inspection in the framework of the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty two unreported military bases and 283 military items including 76 tanks and 60 armoured vehicles were discovered.These items correspond to a similar list of items that earlier had been reported by Russia as having become obsolete from its base in Gyumri, whilst in fact they were transferred to the Armenian army in violation of the Treaty. For good measure the agency tried to hit two birds with one stone by saying that European countries have only just started taking an interest in Russian and Armenian violations of the CFE Treaty, and that this was due to Armenia's recent decision to abandon plans to sign an Association Agreement with the EU and to join the Russian backed Customs Union instead.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment, that "it is well known that the military and security organisations of Armenia and Azerbaijan closely monitor each other's movements. In a situation where confidence between the two countries is non existant such monitoring is necessary and in many ways helpful since it reduces chances of misperception. On the other hand misperception remains the single most dangerous problem. A move by one side can be interpreted wrongly by the other. Seeing is one thing, understanding what you are seeing is very often more difficult. Around all of this are concerns about the role of Russia, which seems to provide the equipment to both sides, leading to the question, are Armenia and Azerbaijan seeing everything, or are they seeing what Russia wants them to see?" 

source: commonspace.eu with APA, 1news.az, and Armenian media sources.

photo: An S300 PMU-2 Favorit anti-craft complexes similar to the ones Azerbaijan purchased from Russia in 2011

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.