Armenia and Azerbaijan closely watch each other. But are they seeing everything, or seeing what Russia wants them to see?

Armenia and Azerbaijan are engaged in massive efforts to monitor each other's military capacities and movements. The two countries have been locked in an unresovled conflict for the last two decades. Whilst major military hostilities ended with a cease fire in 1994 no peace treaty was ever signed, and the two states remain in a state of war. Every now and then the world gets a glimpse into the extent the two countires monitor each other's military activity.

Yesterday, the President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan, visited the National Security Threat Analysis Centre which is part of the National Security Council of Armenia where Centre officials briefed the Armenian leader of the work done and further programs. Of interest is that on this visit Sargsyan was accompanied by the Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty of Organization (CSTO), Nikolay Bordyuzhha, who has become a frequent visitor to Yerevan and by the President of Rostelecom Company Sergey Kalugin, adding to speculation that the president was reviewing new equipment that had been received, or plans to do so.

On the same day, perhaps by coincidence, perhaps not, the commander of Azerbaijan's Air Defense Forces, Major General Altay Mehdiyev, in a rare briefing to the Press, said that Azerbaijan now had sophisticated equipment that "could detect a plane taking off from Armenia's Zvartnots airport after rising 10 meters". The General said that Azerbaijan has the strongest air defense system, which very few countries in the post-Soviet area have. Azerbaijan's system fully covers the air defense of the country", according to the Azerbaijani News Agency APA.

The agency noted that in recent years, Baku has acquired sophisticated anti-aircraft complexes and radiolocation equipment. S300 PMU-2 Favorit anti-craft complexes purchased from Russia in 2011 are most powerful among them, and that all civil and military airplanes of Azerbaijan have already been equipped with IFF (Identification Friend or Foe). It allows the Air Defense Forces to get information about all aircrafts entering the country's air space, according to the source.

In the meantime, another Azerbaijani media outlet, the 1news.az web portal, yesterday also carried a story about the transfer of Russian equipment from the Military base in Gyumri to the Armenian military. Quoting diplomatic sources in Vienna, the portal says that at a recent inspection in the framework of the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty two unreported military bases and 283 military items including 76 tanks and 60 armoured vehicles were discovered.These items correspond to a similar list of items that earlier had been reported by Russia as having become obsolete from its base in Gyumri, whilst in fact they were transferred to the Armenian army in violation of the Treaty. For good measure the agency tried to hit two birds with one stone by saying that European countries have only just started taking an interest in Russian and Armenian violations of the CFE Treaty, and that this was due to Armenia's recent decision to abandon plans to sign an Association Agreement with the EU and to join the Russian backed Customs Union instead.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment, that "it is well known that the military and security organisations of Armenia and Azerbaijan closely monitor each other's movements. In a situation where confidence between the two countries is non existant such monitoring is necessary and in many ways helpful since it reduces chances of misperception. On the other hand misperception remains the single most dangerous problem. A move by one side can be interpreted wrongly by the other. Seeing is one thing, understanding what you are seeing is very often more difficult. Around all of this are concerns about the role of Russia, which seems to provide the equipment to both sides, leading to the question, are Armenia and Azerbaijan seeing everything, or are they seeing what Russia wants them to see?" 

source: commonspace.eu with APA, 1news.az, and Armenian media sources.

photo: An S300 PMU-2 Favorit anti-craft complexes similar to the ones Azerbaijan purchased from Russia in 2011

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)
Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakhstan declares national day of mourning after tragedy

Kazakh president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, declared September 25 a national day of mourning following the deaths of servicemen during military exercises in the Caspian Sea. Twelve Kazakh servicemen died after being swept into the Caspian Sea during the Khazar Qorgany–2026 naval exercises in the Mangystau region on Thursday (September 24). The incident occurred after weather conditions suddenly deteriorated and winds intensified during a combat training mission. In a Telegram post, the Ministry of Defence reported that 19 servicemen had been swept into the sea. So far, three have been rescued, one of whom was hospitalized, while 12 bodies have been recovered.  Search operations were continuing for the remaining four servicemen. A large-scale rescue and recovery effort has been launched, involving Kazakhstan’s Naval Forces, the Ministry of Emergency Situations, aviation assets and other relevant services.   Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev, who is leading a government commission at the scene, ordered a continuous, round-the-clock search for those still missing. Authorities were also instructed to provide financial and other assistance to the families of the deceased. (click image to read in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)