In the seventh part of its series of briefings on the 2012 elections in Armenia, LINKS Analysis looks at the results of two opinion polls just released.

In the seventh part of its series of briefings on the 2012 Parliamentary elections in Armenia, LINKS Analysis looks at the results of two opinion polls released a few days before the elections, and their credibility.

If Opinion Polls are to be believed then the outgoing government in Armenia is one of the most popular in the world. According to the two main Opinion Poll organisers the three parties of the Coalition that kept the government in power over the last five years have between them over 75% of support amongst the decided voters, ahead of next Sunday’s Parliamentary elections. But not everybody agrees.

Adopting in post Soviet countries western style opinion polling, as well as exit polls on election day, has always been problematic. The political environment in most of these countries is considerably less free and tolerant. People are suspicious of pollsters thinking, not always wrongly, that they are acting on behalf of governments. Governments are not often kind to their adversaries so polls take place in an atmosphere of fear. Many opposition supporters therefore do not give their voting intention.

Analysts have mixed views on the accuracy of the polls. On the one hand some are saying that the big issue in this election is that between the two main parties of the former coalition: the Republican party headed by President Serzh Sargsyan and the Prosperous Armenia Party which carries the favour of former President Robert Kocharian, and is emboldened with having in the second place on its candidate list the former Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanyan. Respected analyst Richard Giragosian, writing on commonspace.eu in January summed up the situation as ”a new political confrontation, representing a first ever conflict within the country’s political elite”. If that is the case then the opinion polls released last week may give an indication of where this confrontation is going.

Other analysts however dismiss the polls as part of an overall government strategy to create an aura of victory before the elections with a view to discouraging people from openly supporting opposition parties, and creating conditions that would make election manipulation easier.

Regardless of which version one wants to accept the polls offer some interesting reading. They should however not be taken too seriously since the chances of accuracy of opinion polls in the current Armenian political climate are limited. The poll that matters will take place on the 6th May and it is the result of that poll that must be accurate, and will determine Armenia’s future.

You can read this brieifing in full and previous briefings on the Armenian elections on the LINKS Analysis website

source: LINKS Analysis

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.