Pope’s forthcoming visit to Georgia and Azerbaijan is not only full of symbolism, but is also highly significant

This short briefing note was prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise. There will be a live blog covering the visit of Pope Francis to Georgia and Azerbaijan on commonspace.eu starting on 29 September at 1200 GMT

The Vatican this week released the programme of the visit of Pope Francis to Georgia in Azerbaijan. The Pope will arrive in Tbilisi on 30 September and will stay until 2 October when he flies to Baku before returning to Rome that same evening. This will be the Pope's second trip to the South Caucasus this year. In June he visited Armenia.

Papal visits to Catholic communities throughout the world have become a common occurrence since the days of Pope Paul VI, which saw the head of the Roman church leaving the walls of the Vatican and travelling across continents. Later Popes however turned papal visits into missions with a wider agenda, promoting peace, social issues and values, and importantly inter-Christian and inter-religious dialogues.As the absolute ruler of the Vatican State, the Pope also travels as a head of state, a convenient double hatting in some countries where the Catholic Church is not considered to be so important.

Georgia's Catholic community is small, and in Azerbaijan it is miniscule. Yet both countries in very different ways represent societies and views that the Catholic church and its leader want to interact with.

The visit to Georgia at the invitation of President Giorgi Marghvelashvili is also wholeheartedly supported by the Georgian Orthodox Church. Its leader, the Catholicos Patriarch of all Georgians Ilya II is not only a much respected national symbol in Georgia, but also one of the giants of the world orthodoxy. Although of advanced age Ilya II remains a towering figure among international religious leaders. Pope Francis has taken a very personal interest in the advance of ecumenism and dialogue between the Christian churches. When Ilya II was younger and in better health he travelled extensively and the Georgian Church became more in dialogue with other Christian churches. This process has stopped, and some say may even have reversed in recent years since the Patriarch travels rarely these days. The visit of Pope Francis will therefore be a good opportunity to renew links and also to open up a new dialogue between the Churches.

There have been some isolated incidents of orthodox clergy protesting against the Pope's visit to Georgia. When the visit was announced in Aprila fringe group, the "Orthodox Parents Union"came out against the visit. As reported by Tabula.ge the leader of the group, Father Davit Isakadze,said that the Pope is worse than the devil and the President who invited him is a comedian. However, since then any criticism of the visit has been muted, and reduced to a few whispers on social media, and the wishes of the Patriarch to host the leader of the Catholic Church in Tbilisi seems to be respected.

Georgia is a country that politically wishes to integrate fully in the European and Euro-Atlantic community. For many Georgians however the Church and its Patriarch are a source of great pride. Some anti-western forces, with a little nudging from Moscow, have tried to depict the west as being in some kind of conflict with the Orthodox Church because of some differences on social issues. The visit of Pope Francis, with its emphasis on what is common between the Churches will help dispel these rumours.

The Pope will visit Tbilisi only days before Georgians vote in parliamentary elections. That the visit can take place at all so close to the elections is a good example of how far Georgia has gone to becoming a normal European country. Nonetheless the possibility of some kind of provocation cannot be excluded and the Georgian government will be on taking all precautions to ensure the visit is conducted successfully.

From Georgia the Pope goes to Azerbaijan at the invitation of President Ilham Aliev. Azerbaijan is a secular republic but its population is overwhelmingly Shia Muslim. The visit will provide the Pope an opportunity to interact with Shia Islam in ways not so easily possible elsewhere. Azerbaijan is also a big promoter of the dialogue of civilisations. For the Azerbaijani government the papal visit fits well within this direction of work.

The Pope will only stay in Azerbaijan for around twelve hours. There are some sensitivities related to the Papal visit in Baku too. The Pope has developed a reputation of having particularly close relations with Armenians. This comes from the time that he was Cardinal-Archbishop of Buenos Aires where there is a large Armenian community. The Pope's visit to Armenia in June was hailed a huge success by both the Vatican and the Armenian authorities (see more on the Pope's visit to Armenia in the live blog that followed the papal visit on commonspace.eu in June here). The Pope has also used the term genocide to describe the killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks in the early 20th century - a sensitive point for Azerbaijan, even if not so much as in Turkey.

Baku however will roll out the red carpet anyway, because its tolerance of religious freedom is something that it projects very widely.

Under Pope Francis the Catholic Church is changing fast. The Pope sees himself as a modern person and he wants to engage with global issues as a temporal, as well as a spiritual leader. The Caucasus with its complexities and challenges offer plenty of opportunities for Papal diplomacy and charm to play itself out.

This short briefing note was prepared by the editorial team of Caucasus Concise. There will a live blog covering the visit of Pope Francis to Georgia and Azerbaijan on commonspace.eu starting on 30 September at 0700 GMT

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)