Aliev forgot to say that Azerbaijan presented 10 amendments in Kazan

The joint statement by the OSCE MG co-chair-countries' leaders in Deauville was very hopeful, President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev said Tuesday when presiding over the meeting of the Cabinet to discuss outcomes of the socio-economic development in the first half of 2011. Azerbaijani media report.

The reason for such optimism of Aliyev was the statement's reference to the Helsinki Final Act where, as he thinks, the principle of territorial integrity does not contradict to the principle of self-determination and highlights resolution of conflicts within the principle of the territorial integrity of countries.

"This statement is based on Helsinki Final Act and underlines the change in status-quo. In this case, occupied Azerbaijani lands must be freed," Aliyev said. "Armenia has not wanted to change the status quo over the past 20 years. According to the Azerbaijani leader, co-chairs stepped up their activity. \"Azerbaijan accepted Madrid principles at a Sochi meeting initiated by the Russian President while Armenia refuses to do so."

For some unknown reasons, Aliyev forgot to say that the Azerbaijani party offered nearly 10 amendments in Kazan.

To note, a trilateral meeting of the Russian, Armenian and Azeri presidents in Kazan on June 24 resulted in no agreement on the Basic Principle of the peace process. The heads of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia have stated the achievement of mutual understanding on a number of issues, the settlement of which contributes to creation of conditions for approval of the Basic Principles. Afterwards Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian blamed Azerbaijan for non-constructive approach and pointed out that no agreement on the basic principles was signed, as the Azerbaijani party presented new proposals.  For his part, Elmar Mammadyarov blamed Armenia for \"making ultimate concessions from Azerbaijan and distorting the essence of the negotiations launched seven years ago".

Source: ARMINFO News Agency, Armenia

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

Unlike earlier drafts, the resolution references a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood. It is language several council members pushed for. Israel strongly opposes the creation of a Palestinian state - a significant hurdle in the path to future statehood. Key Arab states had pressured drafters of the resolution to include Palestinian self-determination in the text. The UN secretary general's spokesperson stressed that the resolution needed to "translate... into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground" and lead to "a political process for the achievement of the two-state solution". The US, the Palestinian Authority, and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have called for the quick adoption of the resolution. The Palestinian Authority (PA) said in a statement that the resolution's terms needed to be implemented "urgently and immediately". Russia and China did not exercise the vetoes they possess, but abstained to allow the resolution to pass, largely because the PA and eight other Arab and Muslim nations backed it.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

UN Security Council approves Gaza Peace Plan

Unlike earlier drafts, the resolution references a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood. It is language several council members pushed for. Israel strongly opposes the creation of a Palestinian state - a significant hurdle in the path to future statehood. Key Arab states had pressured drafters of the resolution to include Palestinian self-determination in the text. The UN secretary general's spokesperson stressed that the resolution needed to "translate... into concrete and urgently needed steps on the ground" and lead to "a political process for the achievement of the two-state solution". The US, the Palestinian Authority, and several Arab and Muslim-majority nations including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have called for the quick adoption of the resolution. The Palestinian Authority (PA) said in a statement that the resolution's terms needed to be implemented "urgently and immediately". Russia and China did not exercise the vetoes they possess, but abstained to allow the resolution to pass, largely because the PA and eight other Arab and Muslim nations backed it.