THEY MUST GET THIS RIGHT. After something of a false start, the relations between the government of Bidhzina Ivanishvili in Georgia and Armenia get a boost with the first official visit by the Prime Minister to Yerevan.

Georgia's Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili is in Yerevan, on his first official visit to Armenia since taking office in October. He was received by Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the two premiers already had one round of discussions. Ivanishvili will also meet with the President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan and with the Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church Karekin I.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"Relations between Armenians and Georgians go back centuries, and the two nations share many common heritages, including a Christian faith, many common customs and a shared Soviet past. Yet the relationship has always been complex. Competition between Armenians and Georgians sometimes goes beyond being healthy.

Three factors have determined the relations between the newly independent states of Armenia and Georgia in the last twenty years: (1) The presence in Georgia of a large Armenian community, some in Tbilisi itself, and others compactly settled in the region of Samskhe Javakheti; (2) the very different relationship that the two countries have had with Russia, with Armenia being a close ally of Moscow, whilst Tbilisi fought a war with Russia in 2008; and (3) Armenia's continued dependance on Georgia for land communication with the rest of the world, given the blockade imposed on it by Turkey, and the continued state of war with Azerbaijan.

Different administrations in both countries have over the years taken a pragmatic approach to their bilateral relations, based on need and expedience. Both sides have closed one eye to the other's actions on more than one occasion in order to keep relations on track. At times relations plummeted but not for long. Until last year relations between Georgia's president Saakashvili and Armenia's President Serzh Sargsyan were hailed by the two sides as excellent.

This may have clouded perception as Georgia went through a difficult election campaign in 2012, leading up to a change of government in October. Saakashvili remains President, but power has moved to his opponents. The Armenians, like the Georgians, are not used to political co-habitation, and for a moment they blinked.

On the Georgian side there was also a moment of hesitation until the relationship could be once more calibrated.

It is hoped that the visit of Ivanishvili to Yerevan will consolidate the process. Georgia needs to maintain good relations with Armenia whilst not upsetting its other neighbour Azerbaijan. Both are important for Georgia, but in very different ways.

Armenia on its part needs Georgia more than ever if it is to avoid isolation.

There are many issues that the two sides need to discuss, and many problems to solve. The visit provides a good opportunity to do so. They must get this right, as a lot depends on keeping this relationship healthy -  for both countries and for the region."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The delegation led by the Georgian Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili in meetings with Armenian Ministers in Yerevan on 17 January 2013. (picture courtesy of the Bidhzina Ivanishvili facebook page.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)