THEY MUST GET THIS RIGHT. After something of a false start, the relations between the government of Bidhzina Ivanishvili in Georgia and Armenia get a boost with the first official visit by the Prime Minister to Yerevan.

Georgia's Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili is in Yerevan, on his first official visit to Armenia since taking office in October. He was received by Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the two premiers already had one round of discussions. Ivanishvili will also meet with the President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan and with the Catholicos of the Armenian Apostolic Church Karekin I.

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

"Relations between Armenians and Georgians go back centuries, and the two nations share many common heritages, including a Christian faith, many common customs and a shared Soviet past. Yet the relationship has always been complex. Competition between Armenians and Georgians sometimes goes beyond being healthy.

Three factors have determined the relations between the newly independent states of Armenia and Georgia in the last twenty years: (1) The presence in Georgia of a large Armenian community, some in Tbilisi itself, and others compactly settled in the region of Samskhe Javakheti; (2) the very different relationship that the two countries have had with Russia, with Armenia being a close ally of Moscow, whilst Tbilisi fought a war with Russia in 2008; and (3) Armenia's continued dependance on Georgia for land communication with the rest of the world, given the blockade imposed on it by Turkey, and the continued state of war with Azerbaijan.

Different administrations in both countries have over the years taken a pragmatic approach to their bilateral relations, based on need and expedience. Both sides have closed one eye to the other's actions on more than one occasion in order to keep relations on track. At times relations plummeted but not for long. Until last year relations between Georgia's president Saakashvili and Armenia's President Serzh Sargsyan were hailed by the two sides as excellent.

This may have clouded perception as Georgia went through a difficult election campaign in 2012, leading up to a change of government in October. Saakashvili remains President, but power has moved to his opponents. The Armenians, like the Georgians, are not used to political co-habitation, and for a moment they blinked.

On the Georgian side there was also a moment of hesitation until the relationship could be once more calibrated.

It is hoped that the visit of Ivanishvili to Yerevan will consolidate the process. Georgia needs to maintain good relations with Armenia whilst not upsetting its other neighbour Azerbaijan. Both are important for Georgia, but in very different ways.

Armenia on its part needs Georgia more than ever if it is to avoid isolation.

There are many issues that the two sides need to discuss, and many problems to solve. The visit provides a good opportunity to do so. They must get this right, as a lot depends on keeping this relationship healthy -  for both countries and for the region."

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The delegation led by the Georgian Prime Minister Bidhzina Ivanishvili in meetings with Armenian Ministers in Yerevan on 17 January 2013. (picture courtesy of the Bidhzina Ivanishvili facebook page.)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular