President of Armenia: The so called "diplomatic correctness" in this case is simply detrimental for the security of this region

I am glad to welcome you to the Presidential Palace, welcome you to Armenia.  OSCE is a very important organization for Armenia not only because this Organization has in its framework several institutions - the Minsk Group, the High-level Planning Group, the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Personal Representative - all of them dealing with the Nagorno Karabakh problem, but also because the OSCE principles and the
comprehensive concept of security is fully shared by our country. It is very important that in the framework of this Organization, we agreed that security of one country cannot be ensured at the expense of security of another country. We fully implement our commitments.  However, recently an event has taken place, which makes us to seriously reconsider some of our approaches. As you know, in Azerbaijan pardon was immediately granted to a creature which committed a horrendous crime; unfortunately, in our view this event was not the last one.  Everything started when in 2007 the OSCE Minsk Group presented its proposal for the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Many would remember how Azerbaijan rejected the document; then it made a declarative statement that the document in general was acceptable, but afterwards it was trying to give its own interpretations to the principles enshrined in the document. You remember how they were trying to interpret the right of self-determination. You remember how they were trying to interpret the term "referendum." And then a spectacle started which was meant to gain time, to accumulate huge amount of weaponry so that at the opportune moment the Nagorno Karabakh conflict could be solved through the military means.

In our view, pardoning a murderer was not a step to raise Aliev's authority at home - it was an attempt to test the response of the international community to Azerbaijan's outrageous moves. Cannot be any other way because in Azerbaijan and among its leadership, there are, I believe, many people who could soberly see the consequences of such a move. And that testing of the international community's patience, as I said, has started long ago: when Azeris started to violate the CFT treaty obligations, nobody responded to those blatant violations; when Azeri president publicly instructed his Academia to write a history for Azerbaijan where Armenians must not
be mentioned at all, nobody paid attention; when Aliev stated publicly that Yerevan and the entire territory of Armenia is the Azeri soil, nobody reacted to that; when Aliev declared publicly that their number one enemy is the Armenian nation world-wide and that the enemy must be destroyed, again there was no retort. In response to all our warnings, all requests we have made to the Co-chairs, to the rest of the world that it was a beginning of a very dangerous process we were receiving improper responses that Aliev's statements were for domestic consumption. Such a differentiation between the domestic and external audiences simply cannot be - a person cannot think one way in the morning, and another in the evening; one way on Monday, and another way on Thursday. Seeing such a lenience toward these statements, Aliev took up actions. The first one took place during the regional visit of the US Secretary of State: subversive actions were instigated not only on the line of contact but also at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. And again the response was a weak one. And unfortunately, this is not the end of it.

You know, I went through the war, that's why I don't want a new war. I personally felt on my own skin what the effects of the war, its
impact. And I am confident that anyone concerned with security in our region, doesn't want a war. However, desiring is not enough -
actions are needed and that actions must start when you call spade a spade. The so called "diplomatic correctness" in this case is simply
detrimental for the security of this region.

Recently, in Armenia a sarcastic joke appeared. It sounds like this: after these events, the international X organization calls upon Armenia and Azerbaijan not to axe each other in sleep. And this is not a joke to cheer you up, this is our people's attitude towards those international organizations which are trying to introduce parity between the victim and the perpetrator; between the guilty and the innocent. It is extremely bad. I ask you, I urge your governments and our Organization to deal with this issue.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Azerbaijan-Armenia Internet Transit Deal Marks New Step in Regional Connectivity

Azerbaijan-Armenia Internet Transit Deal Marks New Step in Regional Connectivity

Azerbaijan and Armenia have signed an agreement allowing the mutual transit of international internet traffic, creating a direct telecommunications link between the two countries for the first time since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The deal, announced on 17 June by AzerTelecom and Telecom Armenia, is intended to improve route diversity and network resilience in the South Caucasus. The development follows a gradual process of normalisation of relations between Baku and Yerevan. Notably, Azerbaijan has repeatedly identified the restoration of transport and communication links as a key component of a future peace settlement. Since the initialling of a peace agreement during a summit in Washington in August 2025, the two sides have taken several important steps, including progress on border delimitation and the easing of certain transit restrictions. The telecommunications agreement is also significant because it was negotiated by private operators rather than government officials. Industry observers note that commercial infrastructure projects can create long-term economic ties and mutual dependencies that are more difficult to reverse than political declarations.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)