President of Armenia: The so called "diplomatic correctness" in this case is simply detrimental for the security of this region

I am glad to welcome you to the Presidential Palace, welcome you to Armenia.  OSCE is a very important organization for Armenia not only because this Organization has in its framework several institutions - the Minsk Group, the High-level Planning Group, the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Personal Representative - all of them dealing with the Nagorno Karabakh problem, but also because the OSCE principles and the
comprehensive concept of security is fully shared by our country. It is very important that in the framework of this Organization, we agreed that security of one country cannot be ensured at the expense of security of another country. We fully implement our commitments.  However, recently an event has taken place, which makes us to seriously reconsider some of our approaches. As you know, in Azerbaijan pardon was immediately granted to a creature which committed a horrendous crime; unfortunately, in our view this event was not the last one.  Everything started when in 2007 the OSCE Minsk Group presented its proposal for the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Many would remember how Azerbaijan rejected the document; then it made a declarative statement that the document in general was acceptable, but afterwards it was trying to give its own interpretations to the principles enshrined in the document. You remember how they were trying to interpret the right of self-determination. You remember how they were trying to interpret the term "referendum." And then a spectacle started which was meant to gain time, to accumulate huge amount of weaponry so that at the opportune moment the Nagorno Karabakh conflict could be solved through the military means.

In our view, pardoning a murderer was not a step to raise Aliev's authority at home - it was an attempt to test the response of the international community to Azerbaijan's outrageous moves. Cannot be any other way because in Azerbaijan and among its leadership, there are, I believe, many people who could soberly see the consequences of such a move. And that testing of the international community's patience, as I said, has started long ago: when Azeris started to violate the CFT treaty obligations, nobody responded to those blatant violations; when Azeri president publicly instructed his Academia to write a history for Azerbaijan where Armenians must not
be mentioned at all, nobody paid attention; when Aliev stated publicly that Yerevan and the entire territory of Armenia is the Azeri soil, nobody reacted to that; when Aliev declared publicly that their number one enemy is the Armenian nation world-wide and that the enemy must be destroyed, again there was no retort. In response to all our warnings, all requests we have made to the Co-chairs, to the rest of the world that it was a beginning of a very dangerous process we were receiving improper responses that Aliev's statements were for domestic consumption. Such a differentiation between the domestic and external audiences simply cannot be - a person cannot think one way in the morning, and another in the evening; one way on Monday, and another way on Thursday. Seeing such a lenience toward these statements, Aliev took up actions. The first one took place during the regional visit of the US Secretary of State: subversive actions were instigated not only on the line of contact but also at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. And again the response was a weak one. And unfortunately, this is not the end of it.

You know, I went through the war, that's why I don't want a new war. I personally felt on my own skin what the effects of the war, its
impact. And I am confident that anyone concerned with security in our region, doesn't want a war. However, desiring is not enough -
actions are needed and that actions must start when you call spade a spade. The so called "diplomatic correctness" in this case is simply
detrimental for the security of this region.

Recently, in Armenia a sarcastic joke appeared. It sounds like this: after these events, the international X organization calls upon Armenia and Azerbaijan not to axe each other in sleep. And this is not a joke to cheer you up, this is our people's attitude towards those international organizations which are trying to introduce parity between the victim and the perpetrator; between the guilty and the innocent. It is extremely bad. I ask you, I urge your governments and our Organization to deal with this issue.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament approved the temporary elimination of customs duties on goods exported from Armenia to the EU in a plenary session.

The European Parliament, during its plenary session in Strasbourg, approved the European Commission's proposal to apply a system of trade measures for "Made in Armenia" products, which means there will be a temporary elimination of customs duties on a wide range of products imported from Armenia to the European Union.   The proposal presented by the European Commission was adopted at the plenary session of the Council of Europe with 583 votes in favor, 49 against and 39 abstentions. According to the proposal, the European Union plans to eliminate customs duties on a number of Armenian goods for a period of two years. At the same time, it is planned to establish duty-free import quotas for eight types of Armenian agricultural products. These include grapes, apricots, cherries, peaches, and cucumbers. The draft also provides for safeguard mechanisms that will allow the European Union to intervene, if necessary, if increased imports from Armenia have a negative impact on European producers. This step is due to the restrictions imposed by Russia on a number of important Armenian export products since May 2026. They relate, in particular, to alcoholic beverages, mineral waters, fruits and vegetables, as well as their transit through Russian territory. According to the European Commission, these restrictions have disrupted Armenia's traditional supply chains and significantly limited the country's access to traditional export markets. The situation has had a particularly severe impact on small and medium-sized enterprises, as well as agricultural producers, while creating challenges for Armenia's economic resilience. The EU sees the initiative as a temporary measure to support the Armenian economy and create additional opportunities for exporters to access the EU market. The next step for the proposal is formal approval by the EU Council. The regulation will enter into force the day after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. Let us recall that on September 2, the Council of the European Union approved the proposal to establish temporary trade liberalization measures for Armenian products and sent the draft to the European Parliament for approval. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)