Opinion: Why today, 14 April, we mark Georgian Language Day

Today is Georgian Language Day – an important day for the Georgian people. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu, Erekle Koplatadze gives a brief history of the Georgian language and explains why this day carries such significance in Georgia.

Today (14 April) Georgia celebrates Georgian Language Day (Mother Language Day). Whilst this day was first celebrated in 1990, its history goes back to the Soviet Union’s plans to scrap the official status of the language in the Soviet Republic of Georgia in 1978. 

Under the Soviet Union, Georgia was one of the few Republics where the native language was also the official language of the republic. However, in 1978 the status of the language came under threat due to the newly adopted 1977 Soviet constitution, which would have removed Georgian as an official language.

This issue, unsurprisingly, turned out to be very sensitive issue for Georgian students, who marched in their thousands in the streets of Tbilisi in April of 1978. This all culminated in protests in front of the governmental buildings, and in what was then known as Tbilisi park – now known as the Dedaena or the Mother Language Park – on 14 April, the day that legislation was to be ratified on. 

The then-First Secretary of the Georgian Communist Party Central Committee, Eduard Shevardnadze, first called for demonstrations to end. However, aware of the dead-end and how very sensitive the issue was for Georgians, Shevardnadze negotiated with the Kremlin to omit the clause that would strip Georgian language of its official status. 

This was an unprecedented occurrence: mass demonstrations defied Soviet rule and reversed a decision. In 1990, Georgia first celebrated Georgian Language Day (Dedaena Day). 

The Georgian Language

The Georgian language is one of the most unique languages still alive today. It belongs to the Kartvelian language group of South Caucasus languages, mostly spoken in Georgia. Although, throughout its history, the language adopted many foreign words, it remains distinct from other languages and language groups. 

The Georgian language has a rich history, with the first tangible inscription of Georgian script dating back to the 5th century. However, considering the intricacies of the manuscript, it is argued that the Georgian written language dates even further back. 

Throughout its history, the Georgian script evolved into three distinct alphabets and even though only one of them – Mkhedruli – became the state language, the other two scripts are still widely used either by scholars or the Georgian clergy. The script is unique to the Georgian language and does not resemble other scripts, it has 33 letters, and is read and pronounced as written from left to right.

Georgian is currently spoken by slightly more than 5 million people and while it is primarily spoken in Georgia, Georgian remains mother tongue for many ethnic Georgian in Northeastern Turkey and for a small ethnic minority in a village in Fereydan in Iran. However, the number of native Georgian speakers outside Georgia is rapidly decreasing. 

Due to its uniqueness and rich history, Georgian alphabets were added to UNESCO's Representative List of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity in 2016.

 

Source: Written for commonspace.eu by Erekle Koplatadze, the Young Ambassador of Georgia to the Netherlands in 2018-2019. He holds an MA Politics and Security from UCL and an MA International Relations from University of Groningen.
Photo: The Dedaena (Mother Language) statue in Dedaena park ('Travel Plugged')
 
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)