Opinion: A resumption of the Iran nuclear deal is also good for Armenia

Reports from Vienna suggest that Iran and the world powers are close to agreeing on restoring the Iran Nuclear Deal. For a moment it appeared that the negotiations were going to get entangled in the current Ukraine crisis, but it appears that Iran has dissuaded Russia from doing so. In this op-ed for commonspace.eu Benyamin Poghosyan says a deal would be good for neighbouring countries like Armenia who are keen to exploit trade opportunities with Iran.

When President Trump pulled the US out of the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, and launched his “maximum pressure campaign” against Tehran, the other signatories of the nuclear deal did not join the US and took steps to save the deal. The EU even launched a special trade mechanism – INSTEX - to facilitate non-USD and non-SWIFT transactions with Iran, while China continued to buy Iranian oil. The re-imposed US sanctions have significantly worsened the economic situation in Iran but have failed to reach the main goal – to force Tehran to change its regional policy and give up on its ballistic missile program.

During the 2020 Presidential campaign, the future of the Iran nuclear deal was one of the points of contention. Trump argued for the continuation of its maximum pressure campaign, while Biden promised to take steps to restore the deal. After taking office in January 2021, the US started negotiations in Vienna to restore the nuclear deal. Many experts hoped that negotiations would finish by the Summer 2021 Presidential elections in Iran. However, this did not happen, and the newly elected President Raisi asked for a pause. Negotiations were resumed in November 2021, and sides were close to striking the deal.

The launch of the Russian “special military operation” in Ukraine on February 24, 2022, and the heavy sanctions imposed by the US, UK, EU, and their partners on Russia have negatively impacted the negotiation process. The almost complete rupture of relations between Russia and the West complicated the possibility of a combined effort by Russia and Western countries to reach a deal on Iran. Immediately after the start of the war, Iranian officials blamed NATO for the crisis, simultaneously calling for an immediate ceasefire and a “political and democratic solution." However, despite Iran’s positive attitude towards Russia, in early March 2022, Russia demanded "written guarantees" from the United States that wide-ranging Western sanctions targeting Moscow would not affect its economic and military cooperation with Iran. The US has promptly rejected Russia's demand, with Secretary of State Antony Blinken saying that such demands are irrelevant and that sanctions on Russia have nothing to do with the Iran nuclear deal. Iranian reaction was more cautious, as Iran said it was seeking clarification from the Russian side on their demands. However, Tehran was concerned that the nuclear deal might become a hostage to the Russia – West confrontation. Meanwhile, Western powers warned Moscow against wrecking the almost completed deal on bringing the United States and Iran back into compliance with the accord.

"The window of opportunity is closing. We call on all sides to make the decisions necessary to close this deal now and on Russia not to add extraneous conditions to its conclusion," Britain, France, and Germany said in a joint statement to the UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation board of governors.

Later, Russia provided more details on its position, arguing that while speaking about a waiver to Western sanctions in its relations with Iran, it meant only a narrow circle of nuclear-related activities, such as the transportation to Russia of a volume of enriched uranium. However, there is a lack of clarity as to what Russia wants, and whether Russia is seeking to use a nuclear deal as a bargaining chip in its overall relations with the West. Russian foreign minister Lavrov met with his Iranian counterpart in Moscow on March 15, 2022. He stated that Russia valued Iran’s constructive approach to the situation in Ukraine and emphasized that Russia fully supported the restoration of the Iran nuclear deal. Meanwhile, he added that from the Russian perspective, the OPEC+ is the best mechanism to prevent fluctuations in the oil prices as Iranian oil would enter the world market after the restoration of the deal. Russian and Iranian foreign ministers met again on March 30, 2022, in China while attending the summit of Afghanistan's neighboring countries. Both ministers emphasized their readiness to expand economic cooperation despite the “illegal sanctions” imposed by “unfriendly nations” and discussed the situation in Ukraine and Afghanistan in-depth. Moscow wants to alleviate Iran’s concerns and send a clear message that it will not “sabotage” the deal to reach its narrow interests. Meanwhile, some experts argue that the nuclear deal may be restored even without Russia, which will be a tough diplomatic blow to Moscow.

Meanwhile, it should be emphasized that the new Russian demands are not the only obstacles to restoring the Iran nuclear deal. Another significant point of contention is Iran’s demand to remove IRGC from the US State Department foreign terrorist organization list and cancel sanctions imposed on some individuals.

The ups and downs in the negotiations to restore the Iran nuclear deal are closely watched by Iran’s neighboring countries, including Armenia. Yerevan welcomed the deal in 2015, hoping that it would allow Armenia to attract foreign companies, which will produce in Armenia and export to Iran. Armenia opened a free economic zone in Meghri close to the Armenia – Iran border in December 2017, hoping to foster its economic cooperation with Iran. The US withdrawal from the deal dashed Armenia’s hopes. However, the signature of the interim free trade deal between Iran and the Eurasian Economic Union, and negotiations towards establishing the permanent free trade deal, reignited Yerevan's hopes that after the nuclear deal's restoration, the Meghri free economic zone may finally start to function. As the war in Ukraine wrought havoc on Russia – West relations and Armenia braced itself for the challenging economic consequences, the restoration of Iran’s nuclear deal might present Armenia with some new opportunities.

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and Chairman of the Centre for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
photo: A session of the Iran nuclear talks in Vienna (archive picture)
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Azerbaijan and UK sign Joint Declaration on Strategic Partnership

Azerbaijan and UK sign Joint Declaration on Strategic Partnership

On November 12, President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev met with Prime Minister of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Andy Burnham in Dublin. They first exchanged the “Joint Declaration on Strategic Partnership between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.” During the conversation, it was emphasized that the adoption of the Declaration would formally elevate relations between the two countries to a qualitatively new level. They noted that even before the adoption of the document, relations between Azerbaijan and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland had already been characterized by a strategic partnership. Touching upon more than 30 years of successful energy cooperation between the two countries, the head of state said that the United Kingdom is the largest European investor in Azerbaijan. The sides noted that broad opportunities also exist for cooperation in renewable energy, high technologies and artificial intelligence. In this regard, the two leaders highlighted the importance of high-level official visits from the United Kingdom to Azerbaijan and discussions held in recent months. The meeting also included an exchange of views on issues on the international agenda.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)