Opinion: Current international situation creates new opportunities for relations between Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan

The recent visit of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to Uzbekistan marks a new stage in relations between Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. The two countries signed a declaration on deepening the strategic partnership between them in many fields. The documents cover cooperation in the industrial, transport and military sectors. Despite the ongoing Russian-Ukrainian war and its negative effects on the post-Soviet countries, cooperation between the two countries in various fields creates opportunities in both economic and security fields.

In terms of economic opportunities, new agreements can promote trade, investment and cooperation in the logistics sector. First, the trade turnover between Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan was $111.9 million in 2021. Trade turnover reached $65 million in the last five months. During the President's visit, documents worth more than $500 million were signed among business circles. In addition, 19 agreements worth more than $54 million were signed between Azerbaijani and Uzbek businesswomen.

The two countries also decided to establish joint ventures to promote their products to foreign markets. Both agreements can maximize trade relations between the two countries and contribute to their economies. In addition, strengthening trade relations helps both countries diversify their economies.

Furthermore, there is huge potential for mutual investment. In comparison with other Central Asian countries, the Uzbekistan industry is relatively diversified and in recent years both economic and political reforms helped to improve the country’s business environment.  Through  investment  in the manufacturing sector in Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan can improve its economic footprint , improve its industrial experience and develop and diversify its non-oil economic sector, all of which also fit into Azerbaijan 2030  Strategy.

Uzbekistan can invest in Azerbaijan's energy sector and newly liberated regions. In terms of the energy sector, new investments may lead Uzbekistan to participate in projects in the oil and gas fields, and to cooperate in oil refining and the production of petrochemicals. In addition, Uzbekistan can exchange knowledge and experience and promote the development of human capital in the energy sector. The newly  signed "Roadmap" on expanding cooperation between SOCAR and Uzbekneftegaz shows that both countries are interested in developing cooperation and exchanging experiences in the energy sector.

In addition, Uzbekistan can invest in the Karabakh region. It can benefit to the beneficial use of the natural resources of the liberated areas through investment.  

Finally, the two countries are establishing a joint fund to finance  projects in the field of construction, oil, gas, petrochemical and agro-based industries that can accelerate their industrialization and help them diversify their economies.

In logistics and transport sector has also huge potential for cooperation. Due to the Ukraine war, most companies do not prefer to Russian route and appreciate alternative route which goes through Central Asia and South Caucasus, such as Middle Corridor. In the era of the unstable situation of the Russian route, both Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan play a key role between China and the EU for railway trade. The recent decision to construct the China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan (CKU) railway may increase both Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan's strategic importance to China and the EU.  The new route will be one of the shortest routes to send cargo to both Europe and China, as it will shorten the freight journey by 900 km and save seven or eight days in shipping time. By   cooperation in the transport sector, and by simplifying regional trade procedures, both countries can strengthen their position as transit countries and enjoy transit fees. Uzbekistan’s Orient Logistics' intention to use Azerbaijan's ports for transmodal transportation shows that companies have the motivation to develop cooperation in the transport sector.

Developing relations alongside the economy also create a host of opportunities for the security of the two countries. First, although both countries have alliance agreements with Russia, they follow a balanced and multi-vector foreign policy. At a time when Russia's aggressive foreign policy is on the rise, the deepening strategic partnership gives both countries the chance to increase their maneuvering capabilities and diversify their alternatives.

Secondly, due to the destabilization of the Russian route, China and the EU are increasingly dependent on the countries of Central Asia and the South Caucasus to maintain their rail trade. Growing cooperation between Baku and Tashkent in the transport sector helps them strengthen their strategic position through Eurasian trade and reduce external threats against them.

Finally, the rise in agricultural product prices due to the Russia-Ukraine war  creates an opportunity for the two countries to cooperate in the agricultural sector and ensure food security not only for themselves but also in the regional context. Both countries signed a roadmap for agricultural development

In conclusion, recent developments between Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan create  a range of opportunities in the economic and security fields. In the short term, both of them may increase their trade turnover and mutual investment. In the medium term, both countries have a chance to strengthen their geopolitical and geoeconomic positions between China and the EU, increase their  maneuverability, continue to follow a balanced foreign policy, and reduce external threats in the era of great power politics.

 

Source: Yunis Sharifli is a Research Assistant at the Middle East Institute. He also works as a Junior Research Fellow at the Caucasian Centre for International Relations and Strategic Studies (QAFSAM) and at the Topchubashov Center in Azerbaijan.
photo: President Shavqat Mirziyoyev of Uzbekistan welcomes president Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan during the latter's official visit in June 2022.
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
News
Kazakhstan set for major construction program after Tokayev’s speech

Kazakhstan set for major construction program after Tokayev’s speech

Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev called for the construction and renovation of public infrastructure across all regions of Kazakhstan, and proposed declaring 2027 “the Year of Large-scale Construction”. Delivering his address to the people of Kazakhstan in his “state of the union” address, Tokayev stressed the need to launch construction and renovation projects in regional centers, districts and settlements throughout the country. Our collective nationwide response to the approaching era of artificial intelligence should be to build — and, once again, to build!, Tokayev emphasized. According to the President, key priorities include the construction of roads, airports, railway stations and healthcare facilities. Special attention will also be given to rehabilitation centres for children with special needs. In addition, every region should have creative development centres, sports complexes, libraries and scientific centres. Tokayev also highlighted housing construction as an important priority. Kazakhstan’s large-scale “People’s Construction” program, announced by the President, will pave the way for major infrastructure development and reforms across all sectors of the economy, Kazakh Prime Minister Olzhas Bektenov said at a government meeting. Bektenov stressed the need to develop a clear action plan to implement President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s state-of-the-nation address, delivered on October 28. The Prime Minister said the address sets out the central goal of building a fair, strong, clean and progressive Kazakhstan. Achieving this objective will require making the fullest possible use of the country’s existing potential and the opportunities emerging from modern innovation. Bektenov highlighted the significance of the “People’s Construction” initiative, describing it as the starting point for major infrastructure transformations and comprehensive reforms throughout the economy. “This large-scale project will provide significant momentum for employment growth and improving citizens’ well-being. This address is the most substantive policy document for the near future. We must have a clear action plan for its implementation”, he said. Kazakhstan also plans to build nearly 70 new healthcare facilities across the country. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)