Opinion: culture can play a critical role in Armenia-Azerbaijan peace-building

In this op-ed for commonspace.eu, Onnik James Krikorian writes that culture can play a critical role in the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace-building process. "It can provide positive examples of coexistence and demonstrate how Armenians and Azerbaijanis share similarities despite dominant nationalist narratives that suggest otherwise. Acknowledging and respecting cultural differences could be instrumental in promoting peace and resolving conflicts." 

While culture may not initially appear to be a critical area of focus for conflict resolution practitioners engaged in activities to resolve the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, it is nonetheless important to consider. Although there have been some precedents of cultural initiatives, there are also potential risks involved. Shared or similar traditions, including in cuisine and music, invariably lead to mutual accusations of cultural misappropriation and theft. 

Yet culture plays a critical role in shaping people's perspectives, interactions, beliefs, values, and customs, which ultimately influence their perceptions of conflict and violence. In addition, it can provide positive examples of coexistence and demonstrate how Armenians and Azerbaijanis share similarities despite dominant nationalist narratives that suggest otherwise. Acknowledging and respecting cultural differences could be instrumental in promoting peace and resolving conflicts.   

Unfortunately, however, most attempts at dialogue remain in the political realms and usually involve analysts, researchers, and others who have fewer opportunities to impart any messages to the public when compared to those that can appeal to the public on a more emotional and inclusive level. This is especially the case in terms of reaching a younger audience – one that is often apathetic or even disengaged in domestic or international political processes.

While there have been some successful cultural intiatives, post-2020 there is an urgent need to resurrect such approaches

True, in the past two decades, there have been several cultural initiatives aimed at fostering peace and understanding between Armenia and Azerbaijan, but post-2020, there is an urgent need to resurrect such approaches again through joint concerts, art exhibitions, poetry readings, and music festivals, though nearly always in third countries such as Georgia.

And there were success stories. In 2010, for example, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) Youth Symphony Orchestra, conducted by Vladimir Spivakov, performed in Baku and Yerevan and in each case were attended by the former culture ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan in both locations – Armen Smbatyan and Polad Bulbuloglu. The latter, incidentally, is currently Azerbaijan’s Ambassador to Moscow. 

The CIS Youth Orchestra came amid a number of other unprecedented events. In April the same year, the Catholicos of All Armenians, Karekin II visited Baku, performed a small service in the Armenian church in the centre of the city, and even met with President Ilham Aliyev. The following year, Allahshükür Pashazade, Grand Mufti of the Caucasus and Azerbaijan’s spiritual head, visited Yerevan in one of a few but rare direct flights between the two capitals.

Youth orchestras, jazz festivals and films

Russia might already be planning similar initiatives in the future so perhaps the European Union can consider supporting other efforts. The Tsinandali Festival in Georgia, for example, aims to promote "the language of music in the region, the crossroads of Europe and Asia", and was launched in September 2019. It is currently auditioning musicians for its Pan-Caucasian Youth Orchestra.

And for years the Kavkaz Jazz Festival in Tbilisi has also attracted musicians from Armenia and Azerbaijan as well as Turkey and beyond. Organised by Helen Mechitova, a Georgian citizen of ethnic Armenian origin related to photographer Yuri Mechitov best known for the iconic image of Sergey Parajanov in the streets of Tbilisi, cross-border jam sessions also took place.

Indeed, perhaps Parajanov, the ethnic Armenian filmmaking legend, already highlights the potential role of cross-cultural dialogue. Revered in Armenia for his Colour of Pomegranates cinematic epic about Sayat Nova, his last film was based on Lermontov’s tale of an Azerbaijani troubadour, Ashik Kerib, and was filmed in Baku even as the Sumgait programs occurred. A child of the South Caucasus, Parajanov made sure the music was composed by an Azerbaijani, Javanshir Guliyev. Meanwhile, the Azerbaijani Mugham cultural icon, Alim Qasimov, provided the vocals.

Sayat Nova

Sayat Nova is an Armenian cultural icon of huge importance. As Thomas de Waal told me in an interview I conducted in Yerevan in 2002:

"Sayat Nova wrote many of his songs in Azeri even though there’s this misconception among Armenians that Azerbaijan didn’t exist before the twentieth century. In fact, Sayat Nova wrote a lot of his songs in a language that’s now recognised as being Azerbaijani, it just wasn’t called that. It was called Turkish or whatever. However, it was Turkish of a Caucasian variety that wasn’t from Turkey."

But most people know only Sayat Nova’s Armenian-language work. Perhaps his Azerbaijani poems written need to be rediscovered and promoted. Incidentally, in the Georgian city of Marneuli, which itself is over 80 percent ethnic Azerbaijani with an ethnic Armenian and Georgian minority, a road is named in his honour.

This might not resonate among a younger population in the region, but there are also more contemporary examples. The One Caucasus Festival held in the village of Tserakvi in southern Georgia stands out. Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Georgian contemporary musicians including Baku’s Dihaj and Gyumri’s The Bambir have all taken part in the annual event where cross-border musical collaborations are also staged. The audience is largely local – many ethnic Azerbaijanis and some ethnic Armenians from nearby villages.

Rock, jazz, world, and traditional music all feature at the festival, as does a camping space, making it an ideal location for joint Armenia-Azerbaijan youth workshops in the future. And in Tbilisi there is also a shared stage for more extreme genres. The Wacken Metal Battle Caucasus annually features Armenian, Azerbaijani, and Georgian metal bands all competing with each other for a much sought after place at Wacken Open Air in Germany, one of the largest heavy metal festivals in the world.

Audiences for the competition staged in Tbilisi comprise Armenians, Azerbaijanis, and Georgians, as does the jury.

Despite risks, it is time to think out of the box

Needless to say, there are risks too. Here we can remember the late Armenian peacebuilder Georgi Vanyan whose attempts to showcase Azerbaijani culture in Yerevan and the regions of Armenia more than a decade ago were met with protests, disruption, and even violence. It is also true that it is unlikely that any attempts to stage Armenian cultural events in Azerbaijan are possible. At least for now. 

But it is time to think out of the box. At a recent international organised event in Georgia, for example, a presentation on the use of social media to bring Armenia and Azerbaijan together noted that it would probably be useless to involve food bloggers in the peace process. I had to disagree. Given the endless ‘dolma wars’ on top of bickering over shared folk songs such as Sari Gelin, the similarities and slight differences between often shared cuisines can also represent how close and related they actually are while also adding particular national interpretations. 

And as Azerbaijan celebrates Novruz this month, it is hard not to see the similarities with the Armenian festival of Trndez. Both usher in the spring and pre-date Christianity and Islam. As one saying attributed to an Azerbaijani writer, Ağarəhim, goes: “Dolma yeyənindi, Sarı Gəlin oxuyanındı” – “Dolma belongs to the one who eats it, Sarı Gelin to those that sing it.”

source: Onnik James Krikorian is a journalist, photojournalist, and consultant from the U.K. who has covered the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict since 1994.
photo: Onnik James Krikorian
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

UN Security Council Presidential Statement on the Role of Diplomacy during Active Hostilities

The United Nations Security Council is today expected to adopt a presidential statement on the role of diplomacy during active hostilities. The draft text, which was authored by Pakistan, underscores the importance of maintaining diplomatic engagement even after the outbreak of armed conflict, with a view to containing escalation, facilitating cessations of hostilities and ceasefires, and creating conditions conducive to peaceful political settlements. Resolution 2788 of 22 July 2025, which was initiated by Pakistan, reaffirmed the Council’s commitment to the peaceful settlement of disputes under Chapter VI of the UN Charter. A year later, on 23 July, the Council convened an open debate to review the resolution’s implementation and examine ways of making more effective use of the peaceful dispute settlement tools available under Chapter VI.   The draft presidential statement builds on previous Council products, such as resolution 2788, but it is the first to focus specifically on the role of diplomacy in containing and de-escalating active hostilities. Since the open debate in July, Council members have continued to call for intensified efforts towards de-escalation and dialogue, although differences persist over how proactively the Council should promote mediation and other peaceful means of dispute settlement, particularly in situations where the consent of the parties is contested. In his statement opening the general debate of the 81st session of the General Assembly on 22 September, Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the devastating consequences of ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Sudan, and the Middle East, warning that these and other crises illustrate what happens when “force outpaces diplomacy” and stressing the urgency of sustained diplomatic engagement. The negotiations on the draft presidential statement do not appear to have been particularly contentious, although Council members expressed differing views on some elements of the text. Pakistan circulated the initial draft to Council members on 14 October. Following informal consultations with Council members to address comments on the initial draft, Pakistan circulated a first revised draft on 23 October, incorporating several proposed amendments. On 29 October, Pakistan circulated a second revised draft, which it placed under silence procedure until the following day (30 October). After the US broke silence, a third revised draft was circulated on 3 November and placed under silence procedure until this morning (4 November). The draft subsequently passed silence. The agreed presidential statement emphasises the importance of maintaining direct and indirect channels of communication between parties to armed conflict to reduce the risk of miscalculation and create opportunities for sustained political engagement. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)