OPINION: Mikael Minasyan in Vatican: options and predictions

On 7 March the Government of Armenia adopted a decision  to open an Embassy in Vatican in line with a relevant decree of the Armenian President, and to appoint the president’s son-in-law, Mikael Minasyan, Armenia’s ambassador to Vatican. The diplomatic relations of Armenia and Vatican were established  on May 23 1992. Before Minasyan, Vigen Chitechyan , Armenia’s ambassador to Italy, was occupying this position as an ambassador with concurrent accreditation. But from now on, different ambassadors will represent Armenia’s interests in Vatican and Italy. The given decision at the period when Raffi Hovannisian’s “greetings  revolution” is taking place  in the republic,  is undoubtedly the reason for certain thoughts  which will inevitably result in two main options…

To understand the logic which Serzh Sargsyan was guided with when appointing Minasyan to the position of Armenia’s ambassador to Vatican, let’s study background of the latter. Minasyan started working like his father-in-law’s assistant when Sargsyan was Armenia’s prime minister. In 2008 when Sargsyan became the president of Armenia, Minasyan became the first deputy head of the president’s administration. In November 2011, on the threshold of the parliamentary election in 2012, the president’s son-in-law suddenly left his position and was appointed deputy chairman of the electoral headquarters of the Republican Party of Armenia. Then he was appointed deputy chairman of Serzh Sargsyan’s headquarters on the threshold of the presidential election on 18 February 2013. Before appointment to the position of Armenia’s ambassador to Vatican, in fact the president’s son-in-law did not occupy state positions. Actually, one of the key missions of Minasyan during all these years was organizing of propaganda and PR – the sphere that adopted a laissez-faire attitude over the past years and was chiefly directed for local usage. This was also about the coverage of such painful for the Armenians issues like international recognition of the Armenian genocide and the Karabakh conflict.

Using patronage of the pro-presidential forces and his own financial potential, Minasyan purchased a number of big TV channels which used to organize public opinion polls that were evidence of unprecedented high rating of the authorities. The new information resources, mainly in the form of e:mass media have recently started growing in Armenia like mushrooms. Incidentally, propaganda of Armenia’s and the NKR’s interests used to occupy a modest though not so little place in their activity. However, this is not regarding the information about the life of Armenian and foreign film starts, about murders and suicides, rape and religious sects, homosexuals and other such factors. Today, serious analytical idea in Armenia is expelled by the everyday information. There is a viewpoint that such an information policy is professionally conducted purposefully for protection of a narrow group interests, taking into consideration the new realities and modern information technologies. Almost every month we see in the information area another “military expert” which did not serve in the army, or a “psychologist” that has no experience, an “analyst” which has never analyzed the policy and has got no relevant education, and a PR – technologist  which does not know what is PR. However, all these people which give press-conferences and repeat expressions which they learned by heart, have been forming public opinion in Armenia and about Armenia in abroad. So, the Armenian propaganda has been rather successfully fulfilling the mission placed on it on formation of the public discussion which the authorities need.  The Armenian society was becoming more and more apolitical and was chiefly trusting in the information area which was weakened with “tasty” information that does not form ideas. As a result, Armenian lawyers go on not trusting in jurisprudence, functionaries – in priority of law, members of the parliament – that they are linked with electorate in a certain way, etc.

For this reason, the February presidential election have demonstrated failure of Minasyan’s media-empire, which was not adequate to the reality of the day.  And the “official” 37% of Raffi Hovannisian and 58% of Serzh Sargsyan and the “greetings revolution” that has covered Armenia, have become not the best evidences of effectiveness of this model. According to one of the options, the reason of Minasyan’s appointment was inability to affect public opinion over the presidential campaign, although the data of the Central electoral committee are the result of such an activity. So, according to the first option, the given appointment should be understood like a political deportation of a man which should be removed from direct participation in the post-election processes for some period of time. Especially, the man which is taken by the people like an all-powerful.

The second option seems to be more realistic, according to which having appointed his son-on-law to the position of Armenia’s ambassador to Vatican, Serzh Sargsyan put the start to Minasyan’s career in the international policy. However, one may suppose that Sargsyan with a second term in office, has started preparing the operation “successor”. In 2018 the incumbent president of Armenia in the best traditions of the post-soviet Armenia should name his successor, and this name will sound in the  ears of the people more effectively if it is accompanies with prefix “foreign minister”. One should not rule out that diplomatic activity in Vatican may be very much successful for the political future of the 35 years old Minasyan. Although it sounds funny, but different projects financed by Heydar Aliyev’s foundation and personally  by Mehriban Aliyeva have already started  giving new results in Vatican. And dissemination of new ideas in Europe in the Vatican’s still balanced position on Karabakh settlement may put Serzh Sargsyan in front serious problems. In Armenia they wrongly think that the Karabakh conflict is still being resolved at the line of contact between the armies of Azerbaijan and the NKR, often forgetting about formation of the new unseen lines. And the incumbent president of Armenia may entrust only to Minasyan  the formation of these lines. So, if the president’s son-in-law manages to neutralize the efforts of the Azerbaijani lobby on the Karabakh issue in Vartican, this will become am important basis for his future personal development and building of a serious political career.

ArmInfo

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

A dialogue meeting on the topic: “Climate Change Peace and Security – COP 29 and Beyond” was held at the Bonn University Club in Bonn, Germany, on Friday, 3 May 2024. Representatives of various state-parties to the Climate Convention and of the UN Climate Secretariat, joined participants from around 30 academic institutions, think tanks and civil society organisations to review the work done on this topic at COP28 in Dubai in December and chart a way forward for ensuring the continuation of the process at the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. At the opening session, the meeting was addressed by HE Hana al Hashemi, the United Arab Emirates COP28 Chief negotiator, HE Nigar Arpadarai, the UN High-Level Champion for COP29 in Azerbaijan, and Mr Markus Hicken, Director for Energy Foreign Policy, Climate and Security at the German Federal Foreign Office. Also speaking at the opening session was Ms Maria Paloma Noriega Jalil, representing the UN Climate Secretariat. There followed an intensive one-day of discussions on the current state of the COP process, and the on-going debate on the nexus of Climate Change, Peace and Security within the COP process. The meeting was addressed by world-class experts from leading think tanks and academic institutions, including Chatham House, the German Council on Foreign Relations, ADELPHI, the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, Heidelberg University, The Hertie School in Berlin, amongst others. The meeting positively assessed the steps taken in COP28 in Dubai in December, including the inclusion of climate change, peace and security as a theme of the meeting, the holding for the first time of a day on peace in the deliberations, and the “COP28 Declaration on Climate, Relief, Recovery and Peace”. It was felt that it was important that this momentum will not be lost, and similar actions are also included as part of the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. Whilst it was recognised that the nexus between Climate Change Peace and Security was now widely recognised internationally, inserting this in the COP process remained an issue under discussion. During the meeting three aspects of the Climate Change, Peace and Security agenda were highlighted, namely water scarcity; food insecurity; and landmine contamination and environmental degradation resulting from conflict. Participants called on the State Parties to the Climate Convention meeting in the context of COP29 to ensure proper discussion and action on these themes that affect millions of people and thousands of communities across the world. In his concluding remarks at the end of the dialogue meeting, HE Ambassador Elshad Iskanderov, advisor to the COP 29 presidency, said that Azerbaijan was positive to the idea of having Climate Change Peace and Security as a theme at COP29. Ambassador Iskanderov reminded that the decision to hold COP29 in Baku was taken unanimously, and was an unprecedented confidence-building measure in the context of the South Caucasus.  Azerbaijan wanted to build on what had already been achieved in Dubai. He said that these decisions did not depend on Azerbaijan alone since COP was a multilateral process where the 198 state parties had the final say. Ambassador Iskanderov underlined the readiness of the Azerbaijani COP29 presidency to continue the dialogue on this issue with academia, think tanks and civil society as the preparations for COP 29 progress. He highlighted the fact that the discussion needs to focus not only on the potential that climate change will fuel more conflict and insecurity, but also on the impact of conflicts on climate change and environmental degradation Concluding the Bonn Dialogue Meeting, Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe Foundation, who together with Candid Foundation and ReStart Initiative hosted the Bonn event, said that a lot of work needs to be done between now and November, and particularly the dialogue with the COP Troika countries, the UN Climate Secretariat and interested state parties needs to be continued and intensified. As a concrete step, LINKS Europe will set up an ad hoc working group with other interested non-state actors, to ensure that the conversation continues, and tangible results are achieved.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

Bonn Dialogue Meeting calls for the theme "Climate Change, Peace and Security" to be included in the agenda of COP29

A dialogue meeting on the topic: “Climate Change Peace and Security – COP 29 and Beyond” was held at the Bonn University Club in Bonn, Germany, on Friday, 3 May 2024. Representatives of various state-parties to the Climate Convention and of the UN Climate Secretariat, joined participants from around 30 academic institutions, think tanks and civil society organisations to review the work done on this topic at COP28 in Dubai in December and chart a way forward for ensuring the continuation of the process at the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. At the opening session, the meeting was addressed by HE Hana al Hashemi, the United Arab Emirates COP28 Chief negotiator, HE Nigar Arpadarai, the UN High-Level Champion for COP29 in Azerbaijan, and Mr Markus Hicken, Director for Energy Foreign Policy, Climate and Security at the German Federal Foreign Office. Also speaking at the opening session was Ms Maria Paloma Noriega Jalil, representing the UN Climate Secretariat. There followed an intensive one-day of discussions on the current state of the COP process, and the on-going debate on the nexus of Climate Change, Peace and Security within the COP process. The meeting was addressed by world-class experts from leading think tanks and academic institutions, including Chatham House, the German Council on Foreign Relations, ADELPHI, the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, Heidelberg University, The Hertie School in Berlin, amongst others. The meeting positively assessed the steps taken in COP28 in Dubai in December, including the inclusion of climate change, peace and security as a theme of the meeting, the holding for the first time of a day on peace in the deliberations, and the “COP28 Declaration on Climate, Relief, Recovery and Peace”. It was felt that it was important that this momentum will not be lost, and similar actions are also included as part of the COP29 meeting in Baku in November. Whilst it was recognised that the nexus between Climate Change Peace and Security was now widely recognised internationally, inserting this in the COP process remained an issue under discussion. During the meeting three aspects of the Climate Change, Peace and Security agenda were highlighted, namely water scarcity; food insecurity; and landmine contamination and environmental degradation resulting from conflict. Participants called on the State Parties to the Climate Convention meeting in the context of COP29 to ensure proper discussion and action on these themes that affect millions of people and thousands of communities across the world. In his concluding remarks at the end of the dialogue meeting, HE Ambassador Elshad Iskanderov, advisor to the COP 29 presidency, said that Azerbaijan was positive to the idea of having Climate Change Peace and Security as a theme at COP29. Ambassador Iskanderov reminded that the decision to hold COP29 in Baku was taken unanimously, and was an unprecedented confidence-building measure in the context of the South Caucasus.  Azerbaijan wanted to build on what had already been achieved in Dubai. He said that these decisions did not depend on Azerbaijan alone since COP was a multilateral process where the 198 state parties had the final say. Ambassador Iskanderov underlined the readiness of the Azerbaijani COP29 presidency to continue the dialogue on this issue with academia, think tanks and civil society as the preparations for COP 29 progress. He highlighted the fact that the discussion needs to focus not only on the potential that climate change will fuel more conflict and insecurity, but also on the impact of conflicts on climate change and environmental degradation Concluding the Bonn Dialogue Meeting, Dr Dennis Sammut, Director of LINKS Europe Foundation, who together with Candid Foundation and ReStart Initiative hosted the Bonn event, said that a lot of work needs to be done between now and November, and particularly the dialogue with the COP Troika countries, the UN Climate Secretariat and interested state parties needs to be continued and intensified. As a concrete step, LINKS Europe will set up an ad hoc working group with other interested non-state actors, to ensure that the conversation continues, and tangible results are achieved.