OPINION: "Let them eat cake" or in this case "Let them use twitter"! The choice of words of leaders and politicians is often unfortunate.

We all remember the story from our history lessons. After the French revolution the French King and Queen tried to flee Paris. Their carriage was surrounded by an angry mob. The French Queen Marie Antoinette asked why the crowd was angry, and was told that the people were hungry because they had no bread. “Let them eat cake” she famously replied, highlighting how far away the French Monarchy was from the reality of its people.

One can imagine a modern day Marie Antoinette, fleeing some unspecified Middle Eastern city and asking why the crowd was angry. On being told they are angry because they want freedom of speech, one could almost hear her say, “Let them use twitter”.

The French King and Queen paid for their folly by having their heads chopped off on the guillotine. Modern day despots do not fare much better. The sight of Hosni Mubarak in a cage rattled despots far and wide.

Despotic leaders cut themselves from reality and are isolated by their retinues and servants to the point that their statements often become surreal. It happened at the time of the French revolution and it happens now.

This ability for absurd statements however is not the prerogative of dictators. At a speech on Monday analyzing the recent riots in Britain, the British Prime Minister David Cameron spoke about “… the twisting and misrepresenting of human rights in a way that has undermined personal responsibility”. He then went on to say that Britain will be using its Chairmanship of the Council of Europe to make “important operational changes to the European Human Rights Convention”.

I happen to agree with Mr Cameron that the riots were nothing more than a criminal act and there should not be attempts to justify them in any way. However a basic principle of a democratic society is that criminals have rights too. Mr Cameron’s suggestion that tampering with the European Human Rights Convention is going to solve any of the problems on the streets of Britain is just simply wrong. The Human rights convention is a beacon of liberty that has served Europe well and should not be changed on the whim of politicians reacting to an agitated public. Imagine if the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan had suggested that they will use their country’s chairmanship of the Council of Europe to change the Human Rights Convention what sort of outcry we would have heard.

Lessons should be learned from the dignified response of Norwegian Prime Minister, Jens Stoltenberg, and indeed the entire Norwegian nation, in the face of evil, after the recent Oslo massacres.

Leaders of countries have a big responsibility when they choose their words. They set the tone for their societies. Recently there have been sharp exchanges between the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan and the Turkish Prime Minister and the Armenian president. Societies in the region would have been better served if these exchanges had not taken place. There is a need for a new kind of discourse in the Caucasus region, one that values dialogue and tolerance over chauvinism and confrontation.

Dennis Sammut is the Director of LINKS. He may be contacted at dennis@links-dar.org

The speech of David Cameron is available on the prime Minister's website http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pms-speech-on-the-fightback-after-the-riots/

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)