Opinion: Dennis Sammut meets the President of the country with two giant neighbours, who says he has "nothing to teach but has something to share".

Last week I met the President of Mongolia, Tsakhiagiin Elbegdorj who came to Oxford to speak at the Oxford Union Debating Society

To be honest Mongolia is not a country I ever thought much about, and I attended more out of curiosity then of any urgent interest. Landlocked – some would say sandwiched - between two giants, Russia and China, Mongolia has been both a great empire in its history, as well as a vassal of other countries. For most of the 20th century it was a satellite state of the USSR. President Elbegdorj spoke of how he and others initiated in 1989 peaceful protests that eventually led to the collapse of the Communist system in Mongolia and the creation of a democratic multi party state. It is a country with a small population of less than three million, and many rich natural resources, mostly as yet untapped.

The Mongolian President came to Oxford straight from a meeting with David Cameron, and I wondered how he would deal with his audience.

The Oxford Union Debating Society is not a place for meek speakers. I have seen very experienced politicians being torn apart by surgical questioning from students, cheered on by the audience. On this occasion the audience of around three hundred listened attentively. And it was not because they were like me, not so well informed about Mongolia. The twenty or so persons who asked questions were clearly very knowledgeable and asked pertinent and informed questions.

President Elbegdorj was polished in his delivery and eloquent in his answers. He said that his most important decision when he was prime minister in the 1990s was to free the media from any government control. He described free media as being like an air-conditioning, if you switch it off you will suffer. He defended multi-party democracy and free market economy. He defined corruption as the worst enemy of a society in transition.

Several people asked about relations with China and Russia, and this is when all of a sudden I became very interested in Mongolia. Mongolia keeps excellent relations with both China and Russia. The President said that he had met Vladimir Putin four times and President Medvedev also four times since becoming President. He also praised China, who he said “respects our chosen way of living”. But he made it clear that this relationship with the two neighbouring giants was not to the exclusion of anybody else. Mongolia was working to build good political and economic relations with both the US and the European Union.

Managing relations with large neighbours is not a unique Mongolian problem, yet Mongolia seems to have done so successfully over the last two decades. After the President’s speech I chatted with some Mongolian diplomats who were accompanying him. Mongolia has recently become a partner country of the OSCE and is working on a new Partnership agreement with the EU. It wants to attract EU investment, and is not afraid of European values of democracy and human rights, and is not afraid of talking about democracy and human rights to other countries in Asia and elsewhere. Asked about this, President Elbegdorj said “I have nothing to teach, but I have something to share”. I think he is right.

Dennis Sammut may be contacted at dennis@links-dar.org

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular