Israel says it does not oppose "a good nuclear deal" with Iran

Israeli leaders appear to have recently softened their position as regards a nuclear deal with Iran, saying they would not oppose "a good deal". Israel’s foreign minister, Yair Lapid, said that Israel would have no problem with a strong nuclear deal with Iran on condition that the deal permanently limits Iran’s ability to assemble a nuclear weapon. 

The comments from Lapid came after a meeting with Jake Sullivan, President Biden’s national security adviser. The latter had travelled to Israel to find what he called a common strategy with the Israeli government. Lapid added that the second option, if no such deal is secured is to tighten sanctions. Later, prime minister Naftali Bennett added that Israel would not automatically oppose a nuclear deal with Iran but called on world powers to take a firmer position.

However, not everyone in Israel is happy. National Security Adviser Eyal Hulata told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee that even though Iran is using nuclear blackmail, he believes the international community is united and determined and will force greater strategic concessions from Iran than in the past. The Israeli government says it had succeeded in bringing the world’s attention to Iranian nuclear threats and the obligations they must commit to. 

Israeli has up to now vigorously debated whether to support the negotiations with Iran, or to urge the United States and Europe to abandon the effort. Former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed the deal under the Obama administration and lobbied Trump to abandon it. While appearing to close the gap between the US and Israel, Lapid said that Israel had the right to protect itself from its biggest existential threats. 

The latest round of talks started before the new year, with a short New Year holiday pause, and then resumed this week but with the old disagreement on what comes first: lifting sanctions or compliance by Iranians. Iran is still looking for guarantees in Vienna that the sanctions will be lifted. Iran wants all sanctions to be lifted and a guarantee that that the US will not withdraw from the agreements again. Reports from Vienna say negotiators are working from two draft documents. The progress on the draft documents is unclear but Western countries seem keen to reach an agreement by February. 

 

Source: commonspace.eu with The New York Times (New York City), The Guardian (London), Arab News (Riyadh), Al Jazeera (Doha) and The Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem). 
Picture: Israeli foreign minister Yair Lapid; Twitter: @EuroJewishPress. 
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular