UN Human Rights Council initiates investigation in Ethiopia conflict human rights abuses

Whilst the war in Ukraine overshadowed all other diplomatic activity in the last days, other issues continue to be dealt with in various diplomatic fora. Last week, the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) initiated an investigation into violations of human rights in the conflict in northern Ethiopia. Its chair, former chief prosecutor of the ICC, Fatou Bensouda, will lead the three-chair panel, the council announced.

The panel is to investigate claims of human rights violations in the Tigray region, the epicenter of the civil war that has tainted Ethiopia for the past 18 months. Since the start of the conflict, in November of 2020, there have been reports of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by both the Tigray People’s Liberation Front’s (TPLF) and government forces.

A report, published by the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission, as well as the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), in November 2021 already pointed towards crimes committed by the parties to the war. The report outlines attacks on civilians, unlawful killings, as well as torture committed by Tigrayan, Ethiopian, Eritrean forces, and their allied militias. The panel that is to investigate and further collect evidence of these crimes was initiated by a December UNHRC vote on the proposal, tabled by the European Union.

Along with Bensouda, the Chair of the UNHRC, Federico Villegas, announced the appointment of Kenyan lawyer Kaari Betty Murungi and American law professor Steven Ratner. The panel’s mandate stretches out to a year of investigation, upon which the UNHRC can decide whether it should be extended or not. Should the panel find evidence of prosecutable crimes, they are likely to lead to an International Criminal Court trial against the responsible parties.

After the confirmation of such a panel in the UNHRC vote of December, the Ethiopian government announced its refusal to support any such investigation into war crimes. Along with the African Group—one of 5 UN Regional Groups—Russia and China voted against the motion to establish the panel.

No more to double standards; no more to unilateral coercive measures; and no more to meddling in internal affairs under the pretext of human rights”, the Ethiopian government announced in a statement.

According to the UN, the Ethiopia-Tigray conflict has led to the deaths of thousands, more than two million displaced people and hundreds of thousands in near-starvation conditions. Despite the government’s release of many illegally held prisoners and the lifting of its state of emergency, the war continues to claim lives. Earlier this week, reports of a government blockade causing an acute lack of medical supplies in the Tigray region were published by the UN.

The investigative panel is due to provide an intermediate oral report of its findings during the 15th session of the UNHRC in June of this year.

Sources: Reuters Africa, africanews, OHCHR (Geneva)
Photo: the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.