UN Envoy to Libya resigns a month before scheduled elections

The UN special envoy for Libya Jan Kubis submitted his resignation to the Security Council, which was accepted, just about a month before Libya scheduled presidential elections. Kubis did not give any reason for his sudden departure.

The 15 members of the Security Council were informed of Kubis’s resignation earlier on Tuesday. According to Aljazeera, UN officials and diplomats were shocked he was leaving at this moment. 

Russia’s deputy envoy to the United Nations Dmitry Polyanskiy told reporters he had no indication of his reasons for leaving and was seeking to find out more. When asked about the reason, UN spokesman Stéphane Dujarric said that “It’s a question you’ll have to ask him” but denied there being any fallout between the Secretary-General and Kubis. 

On Sunday, Libya’s interim Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah filed his candidacy to run for president in next month’s elections despite being barred from elections under the current rules of the House of Representatives.  Within days, an official candidate list for the presidential elections will be announced. It is not clear if the elections commission will accept Dbeibah’s candidacy. 

Roughly around 98 candidates applied for the presidential post but the competition remains among five major candidates: Commander of the Libyan army Khalifa Haftar, Qaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam, prime minister Abdelhamid Dbeibah, Speaker of the House of Representatives Aguila Saleh Issa and, former interior minister Fathi Bashaga. Experts suggest that some political forces encouraged the submission of various candidacies in efforts to disrupt the electoral pool during the elections. 


Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian (London), Al Jazeera (Doha), Foreign Policy (Washington DC) and Daily Sabah (Istanbul). 
Picture: UN special envoy to Libya Jan Kubis; Twitter: @almayadeen_es. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

Mayhem in Baluchistan as separatist insurgents attack government targets across the Pakistani province

There was violence and mayhem across the Pakistani Indian Ocean province of Baluchistan on Friday and Saturday (30-31 January), as separatist insurgents attacked multiple government targets, in a co-ordinated attack in a number of towns and cities. Security forces conducted a large-scale counter-terrorism operation across Baluchistan following a series of coordinated attacks targeting multiple districts, killing civilians and security personnel, according to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) of the Pakistani government. "The operation, conducted over two days, resulted in the deaths of 133 insurgents, including suicide bombers, while 15 security personnel were killed during intense engagements", according to the government source. The attacks took place in Quetta, Mastung, Nushki, Dalbandin, Kharan, Panjgur, Tump, Gwadar and Pasni. "The assaults were aimed at destabilising peace in the province and undermining development by targeting law enforcement agencies and innocent civilians", the Pakistani government said.  The Pakistani government said the attacks were launched by “Indian sponsored Fitna al Hindustan,” a reference to the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), saying intelligence reports confirmed the violence was orchestrated and directed by militant leaders operating from outside Pakistan, who were in direct communication with attackers during the assaults. The BLA also issued a statement earlier in the day, saying it had launched what it called “Operation Herof 2.0” and claiming responsibility for attacks in multiple locations. Pakistani officials describe BLA militants as Indian proxies, a charge New Delhi denies.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)