UN Envoy to Libya resigns a month before scheduled elections

The UN special envoy for Libya Jan Kubis submitted his resignation to the Security Council, which was accepted, just about a month before Libya scheduled presidential elections. Kubis did not give any reason for his sudden departure.

The 15 members of the Security Council were informed of Kubis’s resignation earlier on Tuesday. According to Aljazeera, UN officials and diplomats were shocked he was leaving at this moment. 

Russia’s deputy envoy to the United Nations Dmitry Polyanskiy told reporters he had no indication of his reasons for leaving and was seeking to find out more. When asked about the reason, UN spokesman Stéphane Dujarric said that “It’s a question you’ll have to ask him” but denied there being any fallout between the Secretary-General and Kubis. 

On Sunday, Libya’s interim Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah filed his candidacy to run for president in next month’s elections despite being barred from elections under the current rules of the House of Representatives.  Within days, an official candidate list for the presidential elections will be announced. It is not clear if the elections commission will accept Dbeibah’s candidacy. 

Roughly around 98 candidates applied for the presidential post but the competition remains among five major candidates: Commander of the Libyan army Khalifa Haftar, Qaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam, prime minister Abdelhamid Dbeibah, Speaker of the House of Representatives Aguila Saleh Issa and, former interior minister Fathi Bashaga. Experts suggest that some political forces encouraged the submission of various candidacies in efforts to disrupt the electoral pool during the elections. 


Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian (London), Al Jazeera (Doha), Foreign Policy (Washington DC) and Daily Sabah (Istanbul). 
Picture: UN special envoy to Libya Jan Kubis; Twitter: @almayadeen_es. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
"Peace Bridge" between Armenia and Azerbaijan takes next step

"Peace Bridge" between Armenia and Azerbaijan takes next step

From 10 to 12 April 2026, within the framework of the “Peace Bridge” Initiative, another bilateral roundtable with the participation of representatives of Azerbaijani and Armenian civil society is taking place, this time in Azerbaijan. "Peace Bridge" was launched in November 2025 with the support of the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan, to foster dialogue and direct engagement between civil society representatives from Azerbaijan and Armenia. On Friday, 10 April, an Armenian group arrived in Azerbaijan via the land border, crossing through a formally delimited and demarcated section and undergoing all relevant border and passport control procedures.  According to the website of the Armenian public broadcaster, 1lurer.am, this weekend's meeting  includes discussions on the current state of the peace process; the activities undertaken by participants in the “Peace Bridge” Initiative in their respective countries and the results of those efforts; as well as the situation in the region. The meeting agenda also includes separate sessions devoted to efforts to advance peace at the societal level and to increase trust during the next stages of the peace process. (click picture to read the news item in full)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)