UAE withdraws from joint naval patrols with the US

An announcement on Wednesday (31 May) that the UAE had withdrawn its participation from the Combined Maritime Forces (CMF) coalition is supposed to have caught the US by surprise. 

Except that it seems that the withdrawal took place two months ago. But the Americans say they were not notified officially. It seems that what happened was that UAE personnel left the mission according to the usual rotation schedule, but their replacement never arrived. The withdrawal was made public through US sources, and subsequently confirmed by the UAE foreign ministry. “As a result of our ongoing evaluation of effective security cooperation with all partners, two months ago, the UAE withdrew its participation in the Combined Maritime Forces,” the Ministry said in a press release.

“The UAE remains committed to responsibly ensuring the safety of navigation in its seas, in accordance with international law,” it continued. The announcement gave no reason for the supposed end to the UAE's contribution, however for some time the UAE government has been signalling its displeasure at the US approach to security in the Gulf. The UAE, and some other Gulf states, appear to want a more robust and more formal set of security guarantees that what the US has provided so far.

The withdrawal from the Combined Maritime Force is for the moment more symbolic, than operationally vital. It does however reflect growing displeasure in the Gulf with the state of relations with the US and the EU. “They come when they need something, otherwise they forget all about us,” one Emirati expert told commonspace.eu. Given the turbulence in international relations, any rift between the US and its friends in the Gulf, is bound to be exploited by third parties, which is why an intensive and high level dialogue needs to be maintained to reduce “gesture diplomacy”, of the sort the withdrawal from the Combined Maritime Force seems to be.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies
photo: Sputnik

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
NATO's Ankara summit in July likely to be the most important in the history of the organisation

NATO's Ankara summit in July likely to be the most important in the history of the organisation

Preparations are going on in earnest ahead of what is likely be the most important summit in the history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), scheduled to be held in Türkiye in July. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte visited Ankara, Türkiye (21-22 April 2026) to engage with national leadership and visit an ASELSAN Technology Base. In his meeting with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Mr Rutte highlighted Türkiye’s contribution to the Alliance and discussed preparations for the upcoming Summit in Ankara. During his visit, the Secretary General also met with Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and Defence Minister Yaşar Güler.  US president, Donald Trump, has been very vocal in recent weeks criticising NATO countries for not supporting the US-Israel war against Iran. The issue is likely to dominate discussions at the Ankara summit, and many have described this as the most challenging time in the history of the alliance, since it was established in 1949. (click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)