Trouble in Lilliput: South Ossetian politics in crisis

Politics in South Ossetia often takes a Lilliputian character. The tiny territory that seceded from Georgia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and has existed as a Russian protectorate since, is small in size, with a population of around 50,000. Yet its internal politics are often dramatic, with long standing clan feuds playing out in modern political terms. One such crisis appears to be looming

For six months the territory has been gripped by a political crisis in a stand-off between president and parliament. It follows the death whilst in police detention of a young Ossetians, Inal Dzhabiev. His family and clan have pledged vengeance. They wanted the prosecutor general to resign. He didn’t, and 14 out of the 34 members of the territory’s parliament started a boycott of the legislature, depriving it of a quorum.  According to one of the MPs, David Sanakoev, the MPs want the dismissal of the Prosecutor General to be on the agenda of the parliament.

Under the parliament’s rules 23 MPs have to be present for decisions to be made. With the budget not approved, and a raft of other administrative matters brought to gridlock, the situation is now coming to a final showdown.

The government has given the MPs until Tuesday (16 February) to come to the parliament so the budget can be approved, or else…..! Quite what the “or else” is, is not clear.

On Friday (12 February)  18 pro government MPs turned up to listen to complaints from pensioners that had not received their pensions as a result of the stalemate. The president himself, Anatoli Bibilov, also arrived. He accused the opposition of trying to make political capital from the death of Inal Dzhabiev

He said he met with opposition deputies to get them back to work, but they did not come to an agreement even though they received answers to all their questions, because he said “they are not interested in the investigation of the case, their goal is to create chaos”.

The matter becomes more serious because of the involvement of Russia. Russia has bankrolled South Ossetia, especially since it recognised it as an independent state in 2008. More than 80% of the territory's budget comes from Russia. Russian politicians cannot understand how such a tiny place can create so many problems for their geo-strategic ambitions and be so ungrateful. Recently, Moscow sent a delegation from the Federation Council to try to sort out the dispute, but Bibilov said that that did not work either

“We live thanks to Russia, thanks to them we receive pensions and salaries. They are building schools and kindergartens for us, but, nevertheless, many today speak against Russia. What happened to the Ossetian people? Shouldn't we be grateful to our saviours? Just imagine that Russia no longer supports us, what will happen to us. How many good things Konstantin Kosachev himself did to us, in difficult times for our republic he supported us, spoke for us in world platforms. The Russian delegation wanted to convey to the deputies that by their actions they are inflicting a blow on Russia, because Russia gave us independence, ”he said.

Anatoly Bibilov then asked the loyal  deputies to adopt the budget themselves, without waiting for the opposition deputies.

“I once again appeal to you deputies, as a president, who has in the constitution, that he is the guarantor of the observance of the rights of the constitution, the guarantor of human rights, as a person, as an Ossetian - so that they come and give the people their salaries and pensions, so that we, we lived as a republic. It is our duty to serve the people, and we must fulfil this duty.”

Bibilov’s courage however has its limits. He told the MPs he had spoken with Moscow

He also noted that he communicated with colleagues from Moscow, "and they said that we should give them time until Monday."

“They will talk with the deputies and it will be clear by the next week. Probably we will have no other choice but to come and adopt this budget ourselves, ”he concluded.

And thus is the state of the rule of law in the Caucasian Lilliput

Source: commonspace.eu with Caucasian Knot (Moscow), and Cominf.org (Tskhinvali)
Photo: Pensioners attend a meeting in the South Ossetian parliament demanding their pensions.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.