Taliban ban sale of contraceptives alleging a Western conspiracy

In two of Afghanistan's major cities, the Taliban have banned the sale of contraceptives, alleging that their use by women is part of a Western conspiracy to dominate Muslims.

It is the latest step that the Taliban have taken to oppress women’s freedom of choice. Following their takeover in 2021, the Taliban have enforced multiple policies that infringe on women's rights, resulting in significant obstacles to women's and girls' health and education. As a substantial amount of women are not allowed to work anymore, it has caused many families to lose income. Moreover, the Taliban now dictate what women must wear, as well as how they should travel.

Banning contraceptives in a nation with an already vulnerable healthcare system will have a substantial impact. Already one in fourteen Afghan women dies during pregnancy, which is now likely to increase even further.

The ban applies to the cities of Kabul and Mazar-i-Sharif, where according to The Guardian's findings, the Taliban have been conducting door-to-door visits, intimidating midwives, and directing pharmacies to remove all birth control medications and devices from their shelves. They told people that the use of contraceptives and the concept of family planning is a western agenda that is used to “keep control” of the Muslim population. 

It is expected that the prohibition will also be applied to other Afghan cities soon, and may eventually also affect rural villages that do not have the medical facilities to cope with the likely consequences of the ban. 

Activists are calling the ban a violation of Human Rights and are saying the Qur’an does not prohibit the use of contraceptives. In a reaction, Taliban official Ustad Faridoon from Kandahar said a complete ban on the products would not be right, as they should stay available for women whose life could otherwise be at risk.

source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian
photo: AFP/Wakil Kohsar

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Opposition leader amongst those injured after police break up anti government protests in Georgia

Opposition leader amongst those injured after police break up anti government protests in Georgia

Riot police in Georgia have fired tear gas and water cannon to disperse crowds protesting against a bill seen by the opposition as targeting media freedoms and narrowing the space for the work of civil society. Demonstrators threw eggs and bottles at the police outside the parliament in the capital, Tbilisi. The crowds retreated, but clashes continued on the main Rustaveli Avenue late on Tuesday. A number of people were reportedly injured and detained. Georgia's IPN news agency says that Levan Khabeishvili, chairman of the main opposition party United National Movement, was severely beaten and taken to hospital. He was later shown in a hospital bed where he is said to have a broken nose. Reuters news agency says that eyewitnesses saw some police officers physically attack protesters. On 17 April, MPs gave their initial backing to the "foreign agent" bill. The bill is now going through its last stages in parliament. Under the bill proposed by the ruling Georgian Dream party, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and independent media that receive more than 20% of their funding from foreign donors would have to register as organisations "bearing the interests of a foreign power". They would also be monitored by Georgia's justice ministry and could be forced to share sensitive information - or face hefty fines of up to 25,000 Georgian lari ($9,400). The passing of the bill in its first reading triggered a series of street protests. Opponents of the bill demand that the government scrap it, arguing that it is inspired by authoritarian legislation that neighbouring Russia uses to crush dissent.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Opposition leader amongst those injured after police break up anti government protests in Georgia

Opposition leader amongst those injured after police break up anti government protests in Georgia

Riot police in Georgia have fired tear gas and water cannon to disperse crowds protesting against a bill seen by the opposition as targeting media freedoms and narrowing the space for the work of civil society. Demonstrators threw eggs and bottles at the police outside the parliament in the capital, Tbilisi. The crowds retreated, but clashes continued on the main Rustaveli Avenue late on Tuesday. A number of people were reportedly injured and detained. Georgia's IPN news agency says that Levan Khabeishvili, chairman of the main opposition party United National Movement, was severely beaten and taken to hospital. He was later shown in a hospital bed where he is said to have a broken nose. Reuters news agency says that eyewitnesses saw some police officers physically attack protesters. On 17 April, MPs gave their initial backing to the "foreign agent" bill. The bill is now going through its last stages in parliament. Under the bill proposed by the ruling Georgian Dream party, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and independent media that receive more than 20% of their funding from foreign donors would have to register as organisations "bearing the interests of a foreign power". They would also be monitored by Georgia's justice ministry and could be forced to share sensitive information - or face hefty fines of up to 25,000 Georgian lari ($9,400). The passing of the bill in its first reading triggered a series of street protests. Opponents of the bill demand that the government scrap it, arguing that it is inspired by authoritarian legislation that neighbouring Russia uses to crush dissent.