Syria recognises Abkhazia and South Ossetia

Georgia has broken off diplomatic relations with Damascus, and hopes no others will follow. In another twist, a team playing under the Abkhaz flag will this week participate in an alternative football world cup in London. In some ways the football match in London may be causing a bigger headache in Tbilisi than the diplomatic demarche with Damascus.

Syria on Tuesday (29 May) announced that it was recognising the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and establishing full diplomatic relations with them. The announcement appears to have taken the Georgian government by surprise, and Tbilisi promptly broke diplomatic relations with Damascus, describing the move as another unfriendly step by Russia, which is Syria's political and military patron.

Despite the fact that Syria is a war torn country, the move is very unwelcome in Tbilisi and there is some concern that this may be the start by a long declared intention by the two separatist entities to broaden their international recognition. 

Abkhazia and South Ossetia were recognised as independent states by Russia shortly after the August 2008 Georgia-Russia War, in a move that many saw as Russia's attempt to punish Georgia, and to give Russia a free hand in the two territories that had been under its patronage since the early 1990s. At the time a handful of countries followed. Nicaragua and Venezuela - two latin american friends of Russia followed soon after, but somewhat more bizarrely the Pacific micro state of Nauru, also followed suit. Two other small Pacific states - Turvalu and Vanuatu initially also recognised the two separatist entitities, but they changed their mind soon after and restored relations with Georgia.

Russia failed to garner further international recognition for its protectorates in the South Caucasus, and there was an impression that it was not even trying. Damascus' unexpected move is likely an indication of a new Russian push - one that is likely to unsettle Georgian diplomacy.

In another twist to the broader issue of isolation of the separatist territories, an Abkhaz football team is this week playing in London under the Abkhaz flag in an alternative football world cup ( officially known as the CONIFA Paddy Power world cup) for unrecognised nations and others who do not normally participate in international tournaments. Abkhazia plays Tibet on Thursday at the Queen Elizabeth Stadium in Enfield. A ticket costs £11. 

There is a big ongoing debate on the extent to which there should be engagement with Abkhazia and South Ossetia by the international community, even if short of recognition. The Georgian government is adamant that all contacts have to go through Tbilisi. In some ways the football match in London may be causing a bigger headache in Tbilisi than the diplomatic demarche with Damascus, even if it shouldn't

source: commonspace.eu

photo: Young Abkhaz playing football, and preparing for the alternative world cup. Their team will play in London on 31 May. (picture courtesy of conifa.oeg)

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)