Seventh round of nuclear talks with Iran leaves Europeans disappointed

The seventh round of talks between the JCPOA countries and Iran — and the first one with the new Iranian government — were suspended on Friday (3 December) after European countries claimed that Iran walked back from all previous diplomatic progress. The talks are suspended till next week as negotiators head back to their capitals to seek instruction on the new situation. 

The European countries claimed that Iran walked back from its compromises and added new demands. European countries say it is unclear how gaps can be closed in a short timeframe and there is a risk talks will fail by next week. 

During the previous six rounds, negotiators had put forward a comprehensive proposal for the lifting of economic sanctions and worked out ways to restrict Iran’s nuclear program but during this latest round of talks, Tehran demanded sweeping changes to those texts which the European negotiators found unrealistic. Politico Europe reported that even China and Russia, who are generally more understanding of the Iranian stance, supported the European viewpoint.

It is believed that the new demands by the Iranian negotiators are related to the new sanctions imposed by Joe Biden which Iran says are not related to the nuclear deal and so resulted in a hardening of Iranian demands. Iran’s chief negotiator, Ali Bagheri Kani, said that his county was seeking a comprehensive deal and the removal of unjust US sanctions.

Before the suspension, Iran submitted two documents to the negotiators which detail Iran’s proposals on how to lift the sanctions and scale down the country’s nuclear advances. However, the US says it only wishes to lift sanctions “inconsistent” with the JCPOA, keeping in place other sanctions it says are related to human rights abuses or “terrorism”.  

The talks had resumed on Monday in Vienna after a long break following the election of the new leadership in Iran. Despite the failure of the seventh round, European countries see no alternative but to the return to the deal. 

 

Source: commonspace.eu with The Guardian (London), Al Jazeera (Doha) and Politico Europe (Brussels). 
Picture: Iran deputy foreign minister and lead nuclear negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani meeting with E3 political directors and EU coordinator Enrique Mora in Vienna on Thursday (2 December); Twitter: @PMIRAN_Vienna. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular