Saying it with Art

In different ways, art can play a crucial role in times of crises, William Murray writes in this piece for commonspace.eu

Whether being used by celebrities to raise money for charity, as a way to spread awareness and positive messages, or as a form of personal expression, escapism and mediation, art has the potential to play a vital role in how we handle and cope with the coronavirus crisis. So, what makes it so important and how can we contribute?

Art can help us to bring attention to issues and act as a focal point for solidarity. Throughout the struggles of the 20th century, some of the world's most notable artists used their talents to record the emotions of the people, bring attention to issues, and to raise money for certain causes. A good example is Pablo Picasso's colossal 'Guernica' of 1937. The artist's anti-war, 3.5m-by-7.8m masterpiece brought attention to Spanish Civil War, whilst placing a significant emphasis on the too-often, ill-considered plight of women, children and animals in conflict. The painting was unveiled at the 1937 Paris International Exposition, and its subsequent tour was used to raise funds for Spanish war relief [1]. In our current crisis, we are seeing certain famous names using art in comparable ways. Damien Hirst, for instance, yesterday unveiled his new work 'Butterfly Rainbow' as a way of showing support to the work of British National Health Service (NHS) workers during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis; with profits from limited edition prints going directly to the NHS. Hirst stated that the message of his piece is 'hope' and has celebrated the fact that parents and children have been producing and displaying their own versions of the piece in the windows of their homes [2]. Similarly, Scottish Artist Katie Paterson has been selling digital copies of her book 'A Place that Exists Only in Moonlight' to raise awareness and funding for victims of domestic abuse - a plight exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic [3].

Art also plays a pastoral role in times of crisis, promoting positive messages and bringing people together. During World War II, we saw the British government's message of 'Keep Calm and Carry On' displayed in bold text on a bright red poster attempting to lower stress and ensure the composure of a population in turmoil. At present, there are similar efforts being made by a number of organisations to comfort and assure people during COVID-19. At the end of March, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued an open brief for creatives to help bring the organisation's health guidelines to life as well as to counter the spread of misinformation [4]. Not dissimilarly, the Red Cross has also teamed up with 11 artists to promote the message that 'Kindness will keep us together', with proceeds from associated prints and souvenirs going towards efforts to counter the virus [5].

However, art needs not be reserved for those considered artists by society. Art as an activity can play an invaluable role as a form of expression and relaxation for all, and - especially in a time such as this - can promote feelings of hope. Studies have extensively shown the benefits of 'art therapy', with the act of creation alone having significant success in the mitigation of stress, anxiety and depression, regardless of whether the art is ever exhibited to anyone [6]. In the creation of art, we can find a healthy outlet through which to vent and understand our emotions, which are often difficult to put down in words; and it can give us a sense of structure, achievement and self-worth, in a time where many of our normal, day-to-day activities have had to be put on hold. In the words of the writer Kurt Vonnegut:

"Practicing an art, no matter how well or badly, is a way to make your soul grow, for heaven's sake. Sing in the shower. Dance to the radio. Tell stories. Write a poem to a friend, even a lousy poem. Do it as well as you possibly can. You will get an enormous reward. You will have created something." [7]

The nature of the current crisis makes times especially hard on professional artists, who are predominantly self-employed and rely heavily on physical sales and gallery footfall to survive. In order to help them and limit long-term cultural damage, the Artwork Archive has suggested a number of ways that we can support artists during this difficult time. These include taking part in online art classes, commissioning artwork from your favourite creators, attending exhibits and openings online, and donating to arts programmes [8].

Through embracing art as a hobby and by helping professional artists to continue with their work, we can enrich both our own lives and our societies, helping to make this time a little more bearable for all.

We would love to see and hear about how art is helping you through this crisis. Let us know on twitter @commonspaceEU 

Source: William Murray, Project Officer and Coordinator at LINKS Europe, for commonspace.eu

Featured references:

[1] Gallery Walk - 'Guernica': https://www.gallerywalk.org/Picasso_Guernica.html

[2] Damien Hirst - 'Damien Hirst creates rainbow artwork for the NHS': http://www.damienhirst.com/news/2020/damien-hirst-creates-rainbow-artwork-for-the-nhs

[3] The Art Newspaper - 'Artist Katie Paterson raises money for domestic abuse victims at risk during coronavirus outbreak': https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/artist-katie-paterson-raises-money-for-domestic-abuse-victims

[4] talenthouse artworks - 'United Nations Global Call Out To Creatives - help stop the spread of COVID-19': https://www.talenthouse.com/i/united-nations-global-call-out-to-creatives-help-stop-the-spread-of-covid-19 

[5] The British Red Cross - 'Kindness will keep us together': https://giftshop.redcross.org.uk/pages/kindness-will-keep-us-together

[6] J.S. Potash, D. Kalmanowitz, I. Fung, S.A. Anand, G.M. Miller ­- 'Art Therapy in Pandemics: Lessons for COVID-19': https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07421656.2020.1754047?needAccess=true

[7] K. Vonnegut - 'A Man Without a Country'

[8] Artwork Archive - 'How to Support Artists and the Arts During COVID-19': https://www.artworkarchive.com/blog/how-to-support-artists-and-the-arts-during-covid-19

 

 

 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)