Refugees from Senegal conflict trickle into Gambia

On 13 March 2022, the Senegalese military launched an operation against rebels fighting for independence in the Casamance region, a Senegalese southern region which borders Gambia.

Since the clashes began near the Gambian border, more than 6,000 people have fled their homes along the Senegalese border into southern Gambia.

In a statement issued on Tuesday 22 March, the National Disaster Management Agency (NDMA) in the Gambia reported the arrival of 691 people from Casamance to the Gambia, a small nation of 2 million people almost fully enveloped by Senegal.

Gambia's crisis management agency also reports 5,626 internally displaced persons or refugees within the Gambia itself after Senegalese bullets landed in border villages.

In light of recent events, the Gambian agency is calling for urgent humanitarian assistance.

On the Senegalese front, one soldier has been killed, and eight others wounded since the operation to dismantle the bases of the Movement of Democratic Forces of Casamance (MDFC) began on 13 March 2022, according to the Senegalese army.

The primary objective of the Senegalese state is to weaken the separatist movement by undermining their main source of funding: the smuggling of wood and cannabis concentrated between Senegal and Gambia. The proximity to southern Senegal of Guinea-Bissau, one of the hubs of drug trafficking between Latin America, Europe and the United States, has for a long time enabled the financial survival of the Casamance secessionist movement, according to Jean-Claude Marut, researcher and Casamance conflict specialist.

This conflict, is one of the longest-running on the African continent as it began in 1982, but had been largely dormant since the 2014 ceasefire. However, recent attacks, such as the one two months ago, when four Senegalese soldiers died, and 7 others were temporarily captured by MFDC fighters, have reignited a conflict that risks adding to the more than 2.1 million people who have fled their homes since 2013 in the Sahel region due to the growing terrorist threat.

The representatives of the secessionist cause, under the aegis of their leader Salif Safio, have since the start of negotiations in Rome in 2012 insisted on independence. The Senegalese state on the other hand is still sticking to its position that everything is negotiable, except independence. This lack of compromise is causing a diplomatic blockage.

Nevertheless, since the death of former Gambian president Yaya Jammeh five years ago, a sponsor of the Casamance rebellion, the MFDC and his leader Salif Sadio have been weakened militarily and politically.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with RFI (Île-de-France), Reuters (London), Al Jazeera (Doha)
Picture: In Senegal, in Casamance, the army assures that the situation is under control at the border with Guinea-Bissau after two weeks of operations against MFDC fighters' positions; Twitter: @RFIAfrique

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)