Pandemic puts pressure on Gulf States sovereign wealth funds

Sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries are facing unprecedented challenges due to the rise of deficit and pressure to increase their financial obligations to state budgets. 

The drop in crude oil prices, caused by the pandemic last year, may force Gulf countries to increase their deficits and requiring them to withdraw from their sovereign wealth funds.

According to the reports of international rating agencies, the countries of the region may resort to liquidating part of their foreign investments in the sovereign funds rather than withdrawing from their foreign reserves with central banks to avoid disturbing the exchange rate of their currencies. 

The budget deficit of the Gulf states will reach 490 billion dollars in the four years from 2020 to 2023,  due increased financial requirement and low oil revenues, according to estimates by Standard & Poor's.

In a recent report, Moody's Investors Service said that Saudi Arabia and Oman are more vulnerable to a decline in sovereign assets in the medium term. 

Moody's added that the repercussions will lead to a significant erosion of protective margins in Saudi Arabia and the Sultanate of Oman, which reduces the financial strength of their sovereign funds and increases external risks.

"In the case of Oman, a large double deficit will lead to a decrease in both international reserves and sovereign wealth fund assets, which increases the risks of external vulnerability in the medium term," the report states.

As for Qatar and Abu Dhabi, sovereign wealth funds are sufficient enough to cover decades of fiscal deficit at current levels.

On the other hand, Kuwait faces the depletion of its liquid assets due to poor legislative framework despite having a huge stock of assets in its sovereign wealth fund. The legislative approval of the Kuwait public debt law has been suspended since October 2017.

Kuwait needs to liquidate a maximum of $ 15 billion to cover public budget expenditures during the next fiscal year (2021/2022), as per Moody's estimates. The country faces a difficult choice of either passing the pubic debt law or increasing taxes to make up for the losses. 

Sovereign wealth funds are investment entities estimated at trillions of dollars. They are tasked with managing the financial wealth and reserves of countries. They consist of various assets such as real estate, stocks and bonds, and represent the investment arms of countries with financial surpluses.

Although the reputation of that type of sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries or their media appearance is considered relatively recent, some of these same funds were established long before. One of them is the Kuwait Fund, which is the first sovereign fund in the world, as it was established in 1953 under the name of the Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA).

The sovereign wealth fund was established in Abu Dhabi in 1976 under the name of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, while Dubai established its own fund in 2006, and the Qatar Investment Fund was established in 2005. Saudi Arabia had several funds until they were united under one entity in 2015 as part of the 2030 vision. 

Sovereign funds around the world incurred huge losses due to the repercussions of the pandemic. According to a report by Reuters in late March, sovereign wealth funds around the world lost more than 225 billion dollars,  with the share of Gulf funds including $ 300 billion.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with Arabi Post (London). 
Picture: Saudi Stock Exchange (Sita Institute). 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.