Pandemic puts pressure on Gulf States sovereign wealth funds

Sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries are facing unprecedented challenges due to the rise of deficit and pressure to increase their financial obligations to state budgets. 

The drop in crude oil prices, caused by the pandemic last year, may force Gulf countries to increase their deficits and requiring them to withdraw from their sovereign wealth funds.

According to the reports of international rating agencies, the countries of the region may resort to liquidating part of their foreign investments in the sovereign funds rather than withdrawing from their foreign reserves with central banks to avoid disturbing the exchange rate of their currencies. 

The budget deficit of the Gulf states will reach 490 billion dollars in the four years from 2020 to 2023,  due increased financial requirement and low oil revenues, according to estimates by Standard & Poor's.

In a recent report, Moody's Investors Service said that Saudi Arabia and Oman are more vulnerable to a decline in sovereign assets in the medium term. 

Moody's added that the repercussions will lead to a significant erosion of protective margins in Saudi Arabia and the Sultanate of Oman, which reduces the financial strength of their sovereign funds and increases external risks.

"In the case of Oman, a large double deficit will lead to a decrease in both international reserves and sovereign wealth fund assets, which increases the risks of external vulnerability in the medium term," the report states.

As for Qatar and Abu Dhabi, sovereign wealth funds are sufficient enough to cover decades of fiscal deficit at current levels.

On the other hand, Kuwait faces the depletion of its liquid assets due to poor legislative framework despite having a huge stock of assets in its sovereign wealth fund. The legislative approval of the Kuwait public debt law has been suspended since October 2017.

Kuwait needs to liquidate a maximum of $ 15 billion to cover public budget expenditures during the next fiscal year (2021/2022), as per Moody's estimates. The country faces a difficult choice of either passing the pubic debt law or increasing taxes to make up for the losses. 

Sovereign wealth funds are investment entities estimated at trillions of dollars. They are tasked with managing the financial wealth and reserves of countries. They consist of various assets such as real estate, stocks and bonds, and represent the investment arms of countries with financial surpluses.

Although the reputation of that type of sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf countries or their media appearance is considered relatively recent, some of these same funds were established long before. One of them is the Kuwait Fund, which is the first sovereign fund in the world, as it was established in 1953 under the name of the Kuwait Investment Authority (KIA).

The sovereign wealth fund was established in Abu Dhabi in 1976 under the name of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, while Dubai established its own fund in 2006, and the Qatar Investment Fund was established in 2005. Saudi Arabia had several funds until they were united under one entity in 2015 as part of the 2030 vision. 

Sovereign funds around the world incurred huge losses due to the repercussions of the pandemic. According to a report by Reuters in late March, sovereign wealth funds around the world lost more than 225 billion dollars,  with the share of Gulf funds including $ 300 billion.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with Arabi Post (London). 
Picture: Saudi Stock Exchange (Sita Institute). 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
COP 17 in Armenia

COP 17 in Armenia

Armenia is currently hosting the COP17 conference of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which began earlier this week (19 October) and will run until 30 October, bringing around 15,000 participants from 196 different countries to Yerevan. At a leaders' summit held as part of COP17, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan expressed realistic ambitions: “We are halfway towards achieving these goals (Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework), and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made.” Pashinyan pointed towards Armenia's own records, noting that the whitefish stock in Lake Sevan has increased substantially in the last ten years. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze also addressed the summit, with Turkiye sending its agriculture minister. However, there were no reports of Azerbaijani representatives attending. The conference has given Yerevan a valuable international platform, yet the absence of Azerbaijan is likely to be read as a sign that the peace process in the South Caucasus has not yet been translated into wider regional cooperation. The leaders' summit was opened by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, who stressed that hosting the conference was a great honour for Armenia. He expressed hope that it would 'be productive and contribute to protecting our planet's biodiversity'. 'We – the citizens of Armenia, the government, state authorities and local governments – owe a debt to our nature,' the prime minister said. He noted that the international community had already developed the concept of 'living in harmony with nature’ and adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework in 2022, setting out goals and specific targets to be achieved by 2030. 'We are halfway towards achieving these goals, and we must honestly acknowledge that we are not yet moving in the right direction. Our task now is not to make new promises, but to fulfil the commitments we have already made,' Nikol Pashinyan said. The COP17 conference is expected to adopt a declaration at leaders' level. More than 30 documents are scheduled for discussion. If approved, the commitments set out in them will become legally binding on countries that are parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.”
Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)