Kazakh oil to continue flowing from Novorossiysk but the damage to Russian-Kazakh relations has been done

On July 12, a Russian court in Southern Krasnodar upheld an appeal by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) after a previous ruling made last week by a district court ordered the oil transporter to cease operations due to ecological concerns. The initial decision led Kazakhstan’s President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev to look toward new routes for Kazakh energy exports.

The CPC, whose largest shareholders include oil giants Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell, transports one percent of global oil supply. The pipeline has come under increasing political strain since the war in Ukraine began. In March there were reports that storms damaged loading terminals at its end-point in Novorossiysk. However, the veracity of those reports came under scrutiny by energy analysts. After Tokayev refused to recognise the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Luhansk at a conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin in June, the CPC was forced to stop supplies after the sudden appearance of unexploded anti-ship mines dating back to World War Two.

The rationale behind the initial ruling on July 5 was that the occurance of oil spills in the region that the court deemed to be breaches of environmental regulations by the CPC. However, this decision came the day after Tokayev had pledged to help the European Union by supplying much-needed energy, leading to allegations that the court ruling was politically motivated. Subsequently, Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov denied accusations that Russia was exerting political pressure on Kazakhstan, saying “This is hardly likely to be politically motivated.” The ruling was set to cost the government and exporters over $500 million.

Tokayev asked the state-owned oil and gas company KazMunaiGaz (July 7) to explore other possibilities for exports that bypass Russia, instructing "KazMunaiGaz to work out the best option for implementing this.” He added that the company should work with its international partners such as Chevron and ExxonMobil.

The latest judgement imposes a fine of 200,000 rubles ($3,250) but will allow the CPC pipeline to continue operations. While the decision will suit Kazakhstan’s energy sector in the short-term, the persistent instability since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is likely to result in Kazakhstan seeking to free itself from Russian dependence for the export of its energy resources in the medium to long term. For the Kremlin, Nur-Sultan’s willingness to engage with Western countries is a cause for concern and could signal the weakening of Russian hegemony in Central Asia. Kazakh oil may be flowing again from Novorossiysk but the damage to Russian-Kazakh relations has been done.

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with Eurasianet (New York), Financial Times (London), and other media agencies
Picture: Kassym-Jomart Tokayev speaking at the St.Petersburg Economic Forum in June (AP)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular