Danish forces deploying to the Sahel sail straight into a political storm between Mali and Paris

A detachment of ninety Danish special forces personnel who arrived in Mali to re-enforce Operation Barkhane, a regional effort aimed at combating the spread of jihadists forces in the Sahel, has become victim to on-going tensions between the military government in Mali and Paris.

The Malian government has requested the repatriation of the Danish soldiers back to their country, even though they had just arrived as reinforcements in the framework of operation Barkhane - an EU supported initiative aimed at re-enforcing the capability of countries in the Sahel in combating ongoing jihadist violence through the joint Task Force Takuba. Bamako denounced the way the Danish contingent had been deployed, but according to the newspaper Le Monde, this unexpected development is the result of a conflict between Paris and the Malian regime.

On 24 January, the ruling military junta denounced the recent deployment of elite Danish troops in Mali. According to the Malian authorities this reinforcement organised by France was co-ordinated by France  without the "consent" of the Malian government, and that this violates the terms of the "additional protocol" which is part of the existing agreements between France and Mali.

All countries joining Task Force Takuba must indeed be "invited, approved and authorised by the government of Mali".  Denmark insists that it has been invited to deploy the detachment. A letter from 2019 containing the Malian invitation was made public by the Danish government.

According to Signe Marie Cold-Ravnkilde, a researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies, the Malians “want to make it clear that they are the ones who decide in Mali, and to tell France that it cannot just invite foreign forces onto their territory”.  

According to Malians, the modalities of deployment of Task Force Takuba, as stipulated in the terms of an agreement signed between France and Mali in 2013 in the framework of Operation Barkhane, gives too much leeway to the Europeans.

Last month (December 2021), when the Malian government asked for the revision of the defence agreements with France, the Malians demanded that for each new country joining the military coalition, a bilateral agreement be signed sperate from the one that established Operation Barkhane.

For some time France has been trying to involve the EU and EU member states in the anti jihadist efforts in the Sahel, and Task Force Takuba is supposed to be an expression of a new commitment by the EU to engage militarily with the problems of the region. The incident with the Danish forces puts this into question, with considerable political implications.

Sources : CommonSpace.eu, Le Monde (Île-de-France), and other media outlets
Picture : Danish special forces deploying to Mali sailed straight into the middle of a political storm, The Copenhagen Post

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Marijana Kujundzic: "Our message is clear and consistent: no one should live in fear of the ground they walk on"

Marijana Kujundzic: "Our message is clear and consistent: no one should live in fear of the ground they walk on"

The 4th International Mine Action Conference, was held in Baku, Azerbaijan, on 2-3 September 2026. It was organised by the Azerbaijani national agency for humanitarian demining, ANAMA, and the United Nations. The Head of the European Union Delegation in Baku, Ambassador Marijana Kujundzic addressed the conference on 3 September, and reaffirmed the determination of the European Union to work globally for the eradication of landmine contamination. She said, "mine action is about far more than clearing contaminated land. It is about creating the conditions for people to return, for homes and public infrastructure to be rebuilt, and for communities to recover a sense of normality, stability and hope" The title — “Humanitarian Demining for Urban Recovery: Setting Standards of Excellence for Safe Settlements” — captures both the urgency of the task and the level of ambition required to meet it. It reminds us of a fundamental truth: urban recovery cannot begin where land is unsafe, where infrastructure is contaminated, and where communities cannot return with confidence. Humanitarian demining is therefore not only a security imperative, but also a precondition for recovery, reconstruction and human dignity. I know from my own country’s experience that mine action is about far more than clearing contaminated land. It is about creating the conditions for people to return, for homes and public infrastructure to be rebuilt, and for communities to recover a sense of normality, stability and hope. Croatia’s experience has shown that mine action and reconstruction must go hand in hand. Recovery is most effective when it is guided by long-term planning, strong institutions and, above all, the needs of affected communities. In Azerbaijan, this reality is especially visible. The EU recognises and praises Azerbaijan’s major efforts on the ground, especially the work led by ANAMA and all operational actors involved in surveying, clearing, educating, and assisting affected communities. We are proud to stand with Azerbaijan in this effort. This is why the conference theme is so timely. If we speak of urban recovery, we must also speak of standards. If we speak of safe settlements, we must also speak of excellence. A settlement is not safe simply because explosive hazards have been removed. A settlement is safe when: families can return without fear; children can walk to school securely; public services can function again; reconstruction can proceed according to clear standards; and communities can rebuild their lives with confidence in the future. (read her remarks to the conference in full by clicking the picture).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)