Campaigning starts in earnest ahead of presidential elections in Kazakhstan

Presidential elections will be held in Kazakhstan on 20 November. A country that until a few years ago had only known the rule of one man, is now being given a choice between six candidates, the incumbent president, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, and five others:  Karakat Abden, Nurlan Auesbayev, Zhiguli Dairabayev, Meiram Kazhyken and Saltanat Tursynbekova.

A 300 strong OSCE Observation Mission will deploy on election day to observe the elections. Headed by Urszula Gacek, the mission has already deployed a core team of 11 international experts based in Astana and 30 long-term observers, who will travel to the remotest parts of Kazakhstan in 15 two-person teams. The ODIHR also plans to request 300 short-term observers arrive several days before the election day.

Meanwhile the election campaignb has started in earnest. The newspaper Astana times published information on the six candidates and their campaign, which we reproduce here: 

 

Karakat Abden        

Karakat Abden, one of the two female candidates, is now firmly establishing her own platform in the presidential elections campaign based on family and national values centered around people, which she calls the “main wealth of the state.” She aims to “create conditions for a decent life for all Kazakh families.”

 

Karakat Abden during her meeting with light industry representatives on Oct. 26. Photo credit: Abden’s Instagram account

Abden started her campaign in rural areas near Astana on Oct. 23 followed by a visit to Shanyrak large families support center in Karagandy the next day.

“The social sphere is a woman’s domain,” wrote Abden on her Instagram page after the meeting. 

“Most of those who participated in the meeting, like me, are mothers of many children,” she added, stressing that voters could trust Abden to lead on women-related social issues.  

Her next meeting on Oct. 26 with manufacturers and designers of national clothes focused on plans to support Kazakh brands of light industry.

“National clothing vividly emphasizes the culture, tradition and philosophy of our people. Given that my election program is based on national values, this issue could not go without attention,” wrote Abden on Instagram.

On Oct. 27, Abden and her campaign team arrived at the maternity hospital in the city of Ekibastuz.

“All points on my program are socially oriented. Therefore, it pays special attention to important problems of the population, including the development of health care and the system of care for children with rare (orphan) diseases. This is a serious issue that requires a systematic approach in its resolution,” said Abden.

Nurlan Auesbayev

Anti-corruption initiatives and political reforms aimed to end “oligarchic capitalism” are the central themes in Nurlan Auesbayev’s election campaign, a candidate from the National Social-Democratic Party.

On Oct. 27, Nurlan Auesbayev took part in the inspection of the problematic residential areas of Aktobe. Photo credit: Auesbayev’s Facebook page.

On Oct. 25, Auesbayev met with residents of Shakhtinsk in the Karagandy Region, where major coal mines are located.

“I propose that companies producing natural minerals should be nationalized. This will permit us to take great responsibility to ensure proper working conditions for miners,” said Auesbayev as he laid flowers at the monument to dead miners.

On Oct. 27, he arrived in the Aktobe Region, where he visited the Bestamak village and later took part in the inspection of the problematic residential areas of Aktobe, such as Zhanakonys-4 and Batys-2. Residents shared their concerns over gasification and municipal problems that have not been resolved for years. Auesbayev drew attention to the fact that officials often do not pay attention to the requests of residents.

“My party and I have advocated and will continue to advocate for the introduction of elected akims (mayors) at all levels, as well as the development of local self-governance. I told the residents that if I am elected, I will introduce the standards of life quality for the people of Kazakhstan,” wrote Auesbayev on Facebook.

Zhiguli Dairabayev

Zhiguli Dairabayev, a candidate from the Auyl party, voiced his commitment to creating a “new Kazakhstan” based on three main principles: steppe democracy, high spiritual and moral culture, strong agricultural sector and strong regions.

Zhiguli Dairabayev during his visit to the capital’s Shapagat communal market on Oct. 23, where he got acquainted with prices for food and agricultural products. Photo credit: auyl.kz

The rising food prices also took center stage in the election campaign as Dairabayev visited the capital’s Shapagat communal market on Oct. 23, where he got acquainted with prices for food and agricultural products.

According to Dairabayev, it is necessary to develop agricultural production in a sustainable way and increase the production of competitive and export-oriented products to resolve the problem of increasing food prices.

Unsurprisingly, Dairabayev started his campaign in the regions around his native auyl (village) Karakystak in the Zhambyl Region on Oct. 24.

At the meeting, locals shared what a modern auyl should be like and the candidate promised his support and assistance for 6,000 rural settlements throughout the country.

“Auyl and agriculture are indivisible concepts. It is impossible to build a successful Kazakhstan without agro-industry, which, in turn, cannot be built without strong auls,” said Dairabayev at the meeting.

He also visited the Bayzak and Zhualy districts of the Zhambyl Region and met with the agricultural producers of the Turkistan Region.

During his visit to the Kyzylorda Region, famous for its rice production, on Oct. 27, Dairabayev addressed the problem of the shortage of water in the region, which affects the region’s irrigation system.

In his statement, Dairabayev stressed the importance of addressing water scarcity at the state level. “Science and production must work in close interaction and harmony,” he added.

Meiram Kazhyken

Meiram Kazhyken, a nominee of the Amanat commonwealth of trade unions, started his bid for the presidency with a visit to his native Pavlodar Region on Oct. 22.

 

Meiram Kazhyken descended the 260 meters mine shaft, where he saw the working conditions of the miners. Photo credit: Kazhyken’s Facebook account.

During the first meeting with voters at the Center for Youth Initiatives, he spoke about employment, wages, and housing in the regions, in line with his election program that focuses on the individual “regardless of age, gender, nationality, religion, or social status.” The program aims to create equal opportunities for all to develop and fulfill their abilities.

He also met with the employees of the Aksu Ferroalloys Plant and the Pavlodar Alumina Plant.

The candidate spoke about the need to strengthen the role of independent trade unions. He emphasized that it would increase the level of workers’ wages and improve working conditions.

On Oct. 23, Kazhyken continued his trip in the Ulytau Region where he met with employees of Kazakhmys, the largest mining and metallurgical company.

During his visit, on Oct. 26 he descended the 260 meters mine shaft, where he saw the working conditions of the miners. Before the descent, the candidate had lunch at the plant and was shown what was included in the dry ration pack.

One of his election strategies includes a proposal to reduce the retirement age for miners.

Kassym-Jomart Tokayev

Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who serves his first term as a president since 2019, launched his re-election campaign at the headquarters of the people’s coalition which consists of three parliamentary political parties and 22 national public organizations on Oct. 26.

Kassym-Jomart Tokayev visited the headquarters of the people’s coalition on Oct. 26. Photo credit: Toqaev2022 Telegram channel

“Building Just Kazakhstan is my main mission as President,” he said presenting the campaign titled Just Kazakhstan: For All and For Everyone, based on three interconnected principles – a just state, a just economy, and a just society.

Tokayev’s election headquarters meetings began in the Abai Region on Oct. 27, where the head of the public headquarters Yerlan Koshanov met with aksakals (the elderly) and intellectuals of the region to discuss measures to preserve the historical heritage, support the state language, restore historical and cultural monuments, and develop the arts, as reflected in Tokayev’s election program.

Later in the day, Koshanov met with Alikhan Bokeikhan University students.

“Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s election program gives priority to youth,” said Koshanov. “It is proposed to go away from the ‘for youth’ approach to the ‘with youth’ principle. It means special attention will be given to creating conditions for wide interaction of the state and talented, active representatives of the young generation.”

Tokayev’s government has pledged to create 2.3 million jobs for young people as well as to launch a loan for young entrepreneurs at 2.5 percent. Other promises included creative industry development, construction of dormitories, affordable rental housing, development of tools for the purchase of homes, and a two-fold increase in scholarships.

In the Turkistan Region, Beisen Tazhibaev, head of public headquarters in the region, met with the workers of the Green Turkistan institution.

“A working man is the basis of social structures. We often talk about the importance of raising the status of ordinary working people and promoting them in the country,” said Tazhibayev, highlighting that the workers’ well-being is one of the concepts prioritized by Tokayev.

Saltanat Tursynbekova

Saltanat Tursynbekova’s campaign builds on human rights issues and social activities. As the founder and leader of the Kazakhstan without Domestic Violence project, she has firsthand experience in addressing these issues.

In Karagandy Saltanat Tursynbekova met with victims of domestic violence. Photo credit: Tursynbekova’s Facebook page.

Tursynbekova has focused her campaign messages on justice and social equality with a focus on mechanisms for the protection of women, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities.  

On Oct. 24, she met with human rights activists in Astana to discuss gambling addiction, corruption, and violence in society, “the most acute problems of Kazakh society,” according to her.

Her first regional visit was to Karagandy on Oct. 26, where she conducted two meetings with human rights activists and victims of domestic violence.

“Regardless of the current situation, any Kazakh woman has the right to education, health, career, and a normal life without beatings and humiliation. I do not want our women to cry. I will do my best not to let them suffer,” said Tursynbekova at the center for victims of domestic violence.

The next stop in the electoral race was Kokshetau, where she visited the Chance crisis center.

“Through hard work and struggle, we can achieve anything we want. Today I’m running for the presidency. Who could have told me in 1999 that it would turn out this way?” said Tursynbekova, encouraging women to persevere.

In Kokshetau, Tursynbekova also met with physicians at the regional hospital, where she stressed the need to raise the status of medical professionals in the country.

source: commonspace.eu with Astana Times
photo: Montage of the six candidates in the forthcoming presidential elections in Kazakhstan (couresty of Astana Times)

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)