Cairo's underbridges on a path of transformation

Egypt's capital, Cairo, is home to hundreds of bridges and bridge extensions scattered all over the metropolis. For long, under bridges were a place for the homeless, renegades and illicit activities but the scene is rapidly changing now as underbridges turn into cafes and social corners. 

As the public changes, competition is also rising between different cafe owners to attract visitors who enjoy a cup of tea and watch a football game under the bridges. The bridges, in Cairo and outside, were for long considered an essential component of the state's connectivity infrastructure.

Recently, the Egyptian government has launched and built a number of new bridges with the aim of facilitating the flow of traffic. However, these bridges came at a hefty price and some analysts argue that the government is allowing commercial activity around the bridges as a means of generating state revenue to compensate for some of the infrastructure costs. Local sources have confirmed that entrepreneurs rent shops under the bridges in liaison with relevant state entities. 

Business costs at these spaces are expensive but revenues are also high enough to cover expenses. Due to the huge demand among Egyptians, the relevant government authorities had a motivation to invest in these spaces turning them into lively spaces with lights and music. 

Journalists and Urban planners have different opinions on the utilisation of the new spaces. Their critique is that the new experience under the bridges basically serves food and beverages but no diverse social activities. Also, the new state strategy towards under bridges converts the bridges into private business properties and not necessarily to the common public use. 

 

Source: commonspace.eu with Al manassa (Cairo). 
Picture: View of an under bridge cafe in Cairo's eastern neighbourhood. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani officials seek to defuse tension

Armenian and Azerbaijani senior officials have moved to reduce tensions that erupted following an outcry in Armenia after a visit by foreign diplomats to Karabakh and surrounding regions, and a subsequent reaction in Azerbaijan. Armenia’s Security Council Secretary Alen Simonyan has said that following the events that took place at Gandzasar Monastery, he spoke by phone with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s Assistant Hikmet Hajiyev. Responding to a question about whether he plans to publicly respond to Hajiyev’s statements regarding Gandzasar, Simonyan said at a press briefing that not all statements necessarily need to receive a public response. “I think everything has been said, and not everything that is said always needs a response. We need to realize whether this will change something or not. I can say something sharp now, respond in some way, we can all feel good for 15 minutes, but by doing so I could harm the negotiations,” Simonyan said. He stressed that the peace process requires a cautious approach. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)